Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Poisson suspensions and entropy for infinite transformations
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Élise Janvresse, Tom Meyerovitch, Emmanuel Roy and Thierry de la Rue PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 3069-3094 Request permission

Abstract:

The Poisson entropy of an infinite-measure-preserving transformation is defined in the 2005 thesis of Roy as the Kolmogorov entropy of its Poisson suspension. In this article, we relate Poisson entropy with other definitions of entropy for infinite transformations: For quasi-finite transformations we prove that Poisson entropy coincides with Krengel’s and Parry’s entropy. In particular, this implies that for null-recurrent Markov chains, the usual formula for the entropy, $-\sum q_i p_{i,j}\log p_{i,j}$, holds for any definitions of entropy. Poisson entropy dominates Parry’s entropy in any conservative transformation. We also prove that relative entropy (in the sense of Danilenko and Rudolph) coincides with the relative Poisson entropy. Thus, for any factor of a conservative transformation, difference of the Krengel’s entropies equals difference of the Poisson entropies. In case there already exists a factor with zero Poisson entropy, we prove the existence of a maximum (Pinsker) factor with zero Poisson entropy. Together with the preceding results, this answers affirmatively the question raised by Aaronson and Park about existence of a Pinsker factor in the sense of Krengel for quasi-finite transformations.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Élise Janvresse
  • Affiliation: Laboratoire de Mathématiques Raphaël Salem, Université de Rouen, CNRS, Avenue de l’Université, F76801 Saint Étienne du Rouvray, France
  • Email: Elise.Janvresse@univ-rouen.fr
  • Tom Meyerovitch
  • Affiliation: School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
  • MR Author ID: 824249
  • Email: tomm@post.tau.ac.il
  • Emmanuel Roy
  • Affiliation: Laboratoire Analyse, Géométrie et Applications, Université Paris 13 Institut Galilée, 99 avenue Jean-Baptiste Clément, F93430 Villetaneuse, France
  • Email: roy@math.univ-paris13.fr
  • Thierry de la Rue
  • Affiliation: Laboratoire de Mathématiques Raphaël Salem, Université de Rouen, CNRS, Avenue de l’Université, F76801 Saint Étienne du Rouvray, France
  • Email: Thierry.de-la-Rue@univ-rouen.fr
  • Received by editor(s): March 25, 2008
  • Published electronically: December 17, 2009
  • © Copyright 2009 American Mathematical Society
    The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 3069-3094
  • MSC (2000): Primary 37A05, 37A35, 37A40, 28D20
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04968-X
  • MathSciNet review: 2592946