skip to main content
10.1145/1007352.1007353acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Multi-linear formulas for permanent and determinant are of super-polynomial size

Published:13 June 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

An arithmetic formula is multi-linear if the polynomial computed by each of its sub-formulas is multi-linear. We prove that any multi-linear arithmetic formula for the permanent or the determinant of an n x n matrix is of size super-polynomial in n.Previously, super-polynomial lower bounds were not known (for any explicit function) even for the special case of multi-linear formulas of constant depth.

References

  1. S. Aaronson. Multilinear Formulas and Skepticism of Quantum Computing. STOC 2004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Alon, J.H. Spencer, P.Erdos. The Probabiliatic Method. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., (1992)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Burgisser, M. Clausen, M. A. Shokrollahi. Algebraic Complexity Theory. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., (1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. von zur Gathen. Feasible Arithmetic Computations: Valiant's Hypothesis. J. Symbolic Computation 4(2): 137--172 (1987) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. von zur Gathen. Algebraic Complexity Theory. Ann. Rev. Computer Science 3: 317--347 (1988) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Grigoriev, M. Karpinski. An Exponential Lower Bound for Depth 3 Arithmetic Circuits. STOC 1998: 577--582 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Grigoriev, A. A. Razborov. Exponential Lower Bounds for Depth 3 Arithmetic Circuits in Algebras of Functions over Finite Fields. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing 10(6): 465--487 (2000) (preliminary version in FOCS 1998) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Impagliazzo, V. Kabanets. Derandomizing Polynomial Identity Tests Means Proving Circuit Lower Bounds. STOC 2003: 355--364 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Kalorkoti. The Formula Size of the Determinant. SIAM Journal of Computing 14: 678--687 (1995)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. N. Nisan. Lower Bounds for Non-Commutative Computation. STOC 1991: 410--418 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Nisan, A. Wigderson. Lower Bounds on Arithmetic Circuits Via Partial Derivatives. Computational Complexity 6(3): 217--234 (1996) (preliminary version in FOCS 1995) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Raz, A. Shpilka. Deterministic Polynomial Identity Testing in Non Commutative Models. Conference on Computational Complexity 2004 (to appear) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. P. Schnorr. A Lower Bound on the Number of Additions in Monotone Computations. Theoretical Computer Science 2(3): 305--315 (1976)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. E. Shamir, M. Snir. On the Depth Complexity of Formulas. Mathematical Systems Theory 13: 301--322 (1980)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Shpilka, A. Wigderson. Depth-3 Arithmetic Circuits Over Fields of Characteristic Zero. Computational Complexity 10(1): 1--27 (2001) (preliminary version in Conference on Computational Complexity 1999) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. G. Valiant. Negation can be Exponentially Powerful. Theoretical Computer Science 12: 303--314 (1980)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. L. G. Valiant. Why is Boolean Complexity Theory Difficult? In Boolean Function Complexity (M. S. Paterson, ed.) Lond. Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. Vol. 169, Cambridge Univ. Press 84--94 (1992) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-linear formulas for permanent and determinant are of super-polynomial size

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '04: Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
      June 2004
      660 pages
      ISBN:1581138520
      DOI:10.1145/1007352

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader