Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Decidability and invariant classes for degree structures
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Manuel Lerman and Richard A. Shore PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 310 (1988), 669-692 Request permission

Abstract:

We present a decision procedure for the $\forall \exists$-theory of $\mathcal {D}[{\mathbf {0}}, {\mathbf {0}}’ ]$, the Turing degrees below ${\mathbf {0}}’$. The two main ingredients are a new extension of embeddings result and a strengthening of the initial segments results below ${\mathbf {0}}’$ of [Le1]. First, given any finite subuppersemilattice $U$ of $\mathcal {D}[{\mathbf {0}}, {\mathbf {0}}’ ]$ with top element ${\mathbf {0}}’$ and an isomorphism type $V$ of a poset extending $U$ consistently with its structure as an usl such that $V$ and $U$ have the same top element and $V$ is an end extension of $U - \{ {\mathbf {0}}’ \}$, we construct an extension of $U$ inside $\mathcal {D}[{\mathbf {0}}, {\mathbf {0}}’ ]$ isomorphic to $V$. Second, we obtain an initial segment $W$ of $\mathcal {D}[{\mathbf {0}}, {\mathbf {0}}’ ]$ which is isomorphic to $U - \{ {\mathbf {0}}’ \}$ such that $W \cup \{ {\mathbf {0}}’ \}$ is a subusl of $\mathcal {D}$. The decision procedure follows easily from these results. As a corollary to the $\forall \exists$-decision procedure for $\mathcal {D}$, we show that no degree ${\mathbf {a}} > {\mathbf {0}}$ is definable by any $\exists \forall$-formula of degree theory. As a start on restricting the formulas which could possibly define the various jump classes we classify the generalized jump classes which are invariant for any $\forall$ or $\exists$-formula. The analysis again uses the decision procedure for the $\forall \exists$-theory of $\mathcal {D}$. A similar analysis is carried out for the high/low hierarchy using the decision procedure for the $\forall \exists$-theory of $\mathcal {D}[{\mathbf {0}}, {\mathbf {0}}’ ]$. (A jump class $\mathcal {C}$ is $\sigma$-invariant if $\sigma ({\mathbf {a}})$ holds for every ${\mathbf {a}}$ in $\mathcal {C}$.)
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • © Copyright 1988 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 310 (1988), 669-692
  • MSC: Primary 03D25; Secondary 03B25, 03D30, 03D55
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1988-0973174-0
  • MathSciNet review: 973174