Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:52:45.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Geometries Associated with Parabolic Representations of Groups of Lie Type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Bruce N. Cooperstein*
Affiliation:
University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Suppose (P, △) is an undirected graph without loops or multiple edges. We will denote by △ (x) the vertices adjacent to x and . Let (G, P) be a transitive permutation representation of a group G in a, set P, and Δ be a non-trivial self-paired (i.e. symmetric) orbit for the action of G on P X P. We identify △ with the set of all two subsets ﹛x, y﹜ with (x, y) in △. Then we have a graph (P, Δ) with G ≦ Aut (P, △), transitive on both P and △.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1976

References

1. Buekenhout, F. and Shult, E. E., On the foundation of polar geometry, Geometriae Dedicata S (1974), 155170.Google Scholar
2. Carter, R. W., Simple groups of Lie type (Wiley, N.Y. 1972).Google Scholar
3. C∞perstein, B. N., Geometry of groups of Lie type, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan 1975.Google Scholar
4. Higman, D. G., Finite permutation groups of rank 3, Mathematische Zeitschrift 86 (1964), 145156.Google Scholar
5. Steinberg, R., Lectures on Chevalley groups, Yale Mimeograph Notes, 1968.Google Scholar