Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T09:31:24.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Multiplicity of Cohen-Macaulay Algebras with Pure Resolutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Craig Huneke  and
Matthew Miller
Craig Huneke
Affiliation:
Purdue University, W. Lafayette, Indiana
Matthew Miller
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R = k[X1, …, Xn] with k a field, and let I ⊂ R be a homogeneous ideal. The algebra R/I is said to have a pure resolution if its homogeneous minimal resolution has the form

Some of the known examples of pure resolutions include the coordinate rings of: the tangent cone of a minimally elliptic singularity or a rational surface singularity [15], a variety defined by generic maximal Pfaffians [2], a variety defined by maximal minors of a generic matrix [3], a variety defined by the submaximal minors of a generic square matrix [6], and certain of the Segre-Veronese varieties [1].

If I is in addition Cohen-Macaulay, then Herzog and Kühl have shown that the betti numbers bi are completely determined by the twists di.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , 01 December 1985 , pp. 1149 - 1162
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1985

References

1. Barcanescu, S. and Manolache, N., Betti numbers of Segre-Veronese singularities, Rev. Roum. Math. Pures et Appl. 26 (1981), 549–565.Google Scholar
2. Buchsbaum, D. and Eisenbud, D., Algebra structures for some finite free resolutions and some structure theorems for ideals of codimension 3, Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), 447–485.Google Scholar
3. Eagon, J. E. and Northcott, D. G., Ideals defined by matrices and a certain complex associated with them, Proc. Roy. Soc. (Ser. A) 269 (1962), 188–204.Google Scholar
4. Eisenbud, D. and Goto, S., Linear free resolutions and minimal multiplicity, preprint (1982).Google Scholar
5. Goto, S. and Tachibana, S., A complex associated with a symmetric matrix, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 17 (1977), 51–54.Google Scholar
6. Gulliksen, T. and Negárd, O., Un complexe résolvant pour certain idéaux determinants, C.R. Acad Se. Paris (Sér. A) 274 (1972), 16–18.Google Scholar
7. Hartshorne, R., Algebraic geometry (Graduate Texts in Math. 52, Springer-Verlag, NY, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Heath-Brown, D. R. and Iwaniec, H., On the difference between consecutive primes, Invent. Math. 55 (1979)49–69.Google Scholar
9. Herzog, J. and Kühl, M., On the betti numbers of finite pure and linear resolutions, Comm Alg. 12 (1984), 1627–1646.Google Scholar
10. Józefiak, T., Ideals generated by minors or a symmetric matrix, Comment. Math. Helv. 53 (1978), 595–607.Google Scholar
11. Levinson, N. and Redheffer, R., Complex variables (Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970).Google Scholar
12. Peskine, C. and Szpiro, L., Syzygies et multiplicités, C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris (Sér. A) 278 (1974), 1421–1424.Google Scholar
13. Sally, J., Cohen-Macaulay rings of maximal embedding dimension, J. Alg. 56 (1979), 168–183.Google Scholar
14. Schenzel, P., Extremale Cohen-Macaulay-Ringe, J. Alg. 64 (1980), 93–101.Google Scholar
15. Wahl, J., Equations defining rational singularities, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 10 (1977), 231–264.Google Scholar