Topology of discriminants and their complements

V. A. Vassiliev (Independent University of Moscow and Institute for System Studies, Moscow, Russia)

1. The general notion of a discriminant is as follows. Consider any function space ${\scr F}$, finitedimensional or not, and some class of singularities $S$, which the functions from ${\scr F}$ can take at the points of the issue manifold. The corresponding discriminant variety $\sum(S)$ is the set of all functions in ${\scr F}$ having such singularities. For example, let ${\scr F}$ be the space of polynomials of the form $$x^d+a_1x^{d-1}+\cdots+a_d,\tag1$$ and $S=\{a multiple root\}$. Then $\sum(S)$ is the zero set of the usual discriminant polynomial on coefficients $a_i$; this is a motivation for the above general definition. In general, for any $k\geq 2$ we can consider the discriminant $\sum_k$ which consists of all polynomials having roots of multiplicity at least $k$.
Many famous topological spaces can be described as the complements of appropriate discriminants (or at least are homotopy equivalent to them). For instance, so are: the classifying spaces of braid groups; classical Lie groups; spaces of Morse and generalized Morse functions, or, more generally, spaces of maps $M\to {\bf R}^n$ without complicated singularities; iterated loop spaces $\Omega^mS^n$, $m\leq n$, or, more generally, the spaces of continuous maps $X\to Y$ where $X$ is an $m$-dimensional cell complex, and $Y$ is an $m$-connected one; the spaces of knots and linkts in ${\bf R}^n$, $n\geq 3$, and many others.
Now, I describe a general spectral sequence which calculates the cohomologies of all these spaces, and, in many cases, also the stable homotopy types of them.

2.The key notion in this construction is the Spanier-Whitehead duality. (Two topological spaces are S-W dual if they have homotopy types of complementary subsets in a sphere of appropriate dimension: the homology groups of S-W dual spaces are related by the Alexander duality.) This duality is an involution on the space of stable homotopy types: the s.h. type of a topological space is determined by that of any of its S-W dual space.

3. For the simplest example, consider the space $P_d\sbs \sum_k$ of real polynomials of the form (1) having no roots of multiplicity $\geq k$. Its S-W dual space is the one-point compactification $\overline\sum_k$ of the discriminant variety $\sum_k$, and we can replace the study of all stable properties of our space by that of this compactification. (This reduction, due to Arnold (168, see ref. $[Ar_4]$ in [1]) is very useful, because the space of nondiscriminant objects is open and has no evident geometrical structure, while the discriminant is a naturally stratified set, and a lot of its topology can be expressed through this stratification.)
Further, we construct a geometrical resolution of $\tilde\sum_k$, i.e., a space with the same homotopy type but with a more explicit homological structure. First, we take the tautological normalization of $\sum_k$, i.e., the space of all pairs $\{x\in {\bf R}^1, f\in P_d\}$ such that $f$ has a root of multiplicity $\geq k$ at $x$. This space is diffeomorphic to ${\bf R}^{d-1}$, and forgetting the first elements of the pairs defines a proper map of it onto $\sum_k$. The points of the preimage of any polynomial $f$ correspond to all $\geq k$-fold roots of $f$. Then, for any such $f\in \sum_k$ we insert in appropriate way a simplex, whose vertices correspond to these preimage points. The union of all inserted simplices is the desired geometrical resolution $\sigma_{\bf k}$ of $\sum_k$. There is a natural proper projection $\sigma_{\bf k}\to \sum)_k$, whose extension to the map of one-point compactifications is a homotopy equivalence, and it is sufficient to study only the compactification $\overline\sigma_{\bf k}$ of $\sigma_{\bf k}$. This space has a natural filtration: its term $F_p$ consists of all inserted simplices of dimension $\leq p-1$. The term $E^1_{p,q}$ of the corresponding homological spectral sequence equals $\overline H_{p+q}(F_p-F_{p-1})$, where $\overline H_*$ denotes the Borel-Moore homology. On the other hand, the space $F_p-F_{p-1}$ has a natural structure of a fibre bundle, whose base is the space ${\bf R}^1(p)$ of all subsets of cardinality $p$ in ${\bf R}^1$, and the fiber is the direct product of an open $(p-1)$-dimensional simplex and an affine space of dimension $d-p\cdot k$. Thus $E^1_{p,q}$ equals ${\bf Z}$ if $q=d-p(k-1)-1$ and $p\leq[d/k]$, and is trivial for all other $p,q$. Obviously our sequence degenerates at this term $E^1$ and gives immediately the answer.
It is the time now to remember that we are calculating not the homology of the discrimnant, but the (Alexander dual to it) cohomology of its complement. Therefore it is natural to invert our spectral sequence formally into a cohomological one by setting $E^{p,q}_r\equiv E^r_{-p,d-q-1}$, so that the resulting sequence lies in the second quadrant and converges exactly to the cohomology of $P_d\sbs \sum_k$. Its term $E^{p,q}_1$ equals ${\bf Z}$ if $q=-p(k-1)$, $p\in[-d/k],0]$, and is trivial for other $p,q$.

4. An important property of this sequence is its stabilization when $d$ increases: for any $d'>d$, the corresponding sequences, calculating the cohomologies of spaces $P_d\sbs \sum_k,P_{d'}\sbs\sum_k$, coincide in the "stable" domain $\{p,q\colon p\geq -[d/k]\}$. These spaces $P_d\sbs \sum_k$ can be considered as finite dimensional approximations of a space of smooth functions ${\bf R}^1\to{\bf R}^1$ with, some fixed behavior at infinity and without zeros of multiplicity $\geq k$; our spectral sequences for increasing $d$ actually converge to a stable spectral sequence calculating the cohomology of the later space. Moreover, these sequences prove that this space is homology equivalent to the loop space $\Omega({\bf R}^{k-1}\sbs 0)\sim\Omega S^{k-1}$ (and this equivalence is defined by the jet extensions). Indeed, this is a very special case of the following general situation.

5. Spaces of functions without complicated singularities. Let $S$ be a class of singularities of maps of $m$-dimensional manifolds to ${\bf R}^n$, i.e., a semialgebraic ${\rm Diff}({\bf R}^m)$-invariant closed subset in the space of $k$-jets of maps ${\bf R}^m\to {\bf R}^n$. Then for any $m$-manifold $M$ the corresponding subset $S(M)$ in the jet space $J^k(M,{\bf R}^n)$ is well-defined.
Theorem. If $M$ is a closed manifold and the set of maps $M\to {\bf R}^n$ having the singularities of the class $S$ has codimension $r\geq 2$ in the space of all smooth maps, then the space of maps without such singularities is homology equivalent to the space of continuous sections of the jet bundle $J^k(M,{\bf R}^n)\to M$ which do not intersect $S(M)$; this equivalence is induced by the $k$-jet extensions of maps.
(For several other results of this kind, see ref. $[I_1]$ in [1].)
Indeed, the homologies of both spaces can be calculated by the spectral sequences generalizing the above one and naturally isomorphic starting with the term $E_1$. This term lies in the edge $\{p,q\colon p<0,rp+q\geq 0\}$ and has an explicit description: say, for any negative $p$ the column $E^{p,*}_1$ equals (up to a shift and inversion of dimensions) the Borel-Moore homology group of a natural fibre bundle, whose base is the space $M(-p)$ of subsets of cardinality $-p$ in $M$, and the fiber is the $(-p)$-th Cartesian product of the set $S$.

6. The previous theorem has also complex analogues: say, the May-Segal formula for the homology of the stable braid group, $H^*({\rm Br}(\infty))\cong H^*(\Omega^2S^3)$, is of the same nature.

7. The simplest version of this spectral sequence, defined by singularities of 0-jets, calculates the cohomology of {\bf spaces of continuous maps of arbitrary $m$-dimensional $CW$-complex $X$ into $m$-connected complex $Y$}. (The simplest version of this simplest version is the Adams spectral sequence for the loop spaces.) Indeed, we may assume that $Y$ is finite dimensional. Imbed it in a sphere $S^N$ ($N$ very large), and let $\Psi$ be a S-W dual to $Y$ subcomplex in $S^N$. Let $C\Psi$ be the union of rays in ${\bf R}^{N+1}$ issuing from the origin and penetrating the unit sphere in the points of $\Psi$. Take for the function space ${\scr F}$ the space of continuous maps $X\to {\bf R}^{N+1}$, and define the discriminant as the set of maps whose images intersect $C\Psi$. Since $Y$ is $m$-connected, $\Psi$ can be chosen to be of codimension $\geq m+2$ in $S^N$, and hence the codimension $r$ of the disriminant in ${\scr F}$ is $\geq 2$. The space of maps $X\to Y$ is obviously homotopy equivalent to the complement of this discriminant, and hence the cohomology of this space can be calculated by a spectral sequence very similar to the previous one: it lies in the second quadrant in the edge $\{p,q\colon p<0,rp+q\geq 0\}$, and its term $E^{p,q}_1$ is as follows. Let $\Pi(t)$ be the fibre bundle over the configuration space $X(t)$, whose fiber over a point $\{z_1,\cdots, z_t\}$ is the Cartesian product of $t$ examples of $C\Psi$ which are in a correspondence with the points $z_i$ (and are permuted in the obvious way over the loops in the base space $X(t)$ permuting these points). Then, $E^{p,q}_1\cong \overline H_{-p(N+1)-q}(\Pi(-p),(\pm{\bf Z})^{\otimes N})$, where $\pm{\bf Z}$ is the local group locally isomorphic to ${\bf Z}$ and changing the orientation over the loops defining odd permutations of the points $z_i$. This spectral sequence has also a "relative" variant (calculating the homology of maps $X\to Y$ coinciding with a fixed map on some subcomplex $K$ in $X$): in this case $\Pi(-p)$ in the previous formula should be defined as a similar fibre bundle over $(X\sbs K)(-p)$.
If both $X$ and $Y$ are the spheres, this spectral sequence degenerates at the first term and gives the Snaith splitting formula for the homology of iterated loop spaces of spheres.
Also in the "marginal" case, when $X$ is $m$-dimensional and $Y$ is $(m-1)$-connected, this spectral sequence provides some homology classes of $Y^X$, but generally not all of them.
Here are few more consequences of the same technics.

8. Complements of resultant and discriminant varieties}. Consider the space $(CP_d)^k$ of all systems of $k$ complex polynomials of the form (1) in ${\bf C}^1$.
Theorem. The space of nonresultant (i.e., having no common roots) systems in $(CP_d)^k$ is stable homotopy equivalent to the space of all complex polynomials (1) of degree $dk$ without roots of multiplicity $\geq k$. The same is true also for real systems and polynomials.
(In the case $k=2$, this fact was established previously by F. R. Cohen, R. L. Cohen, B. M. Mann and R. J. Milgram, see reference [CCMM] in [1].)

9. We can define a discriminant as the space of all maps $S^1\to {\bf R}^n$, $n\geq 3$, which are not the knots, i.e., have singularities of selfintersections. Then, a spectral sequence similar to the above one provides many (all if $n\geq 4$) cohomology classes of the spaces of knots and links, in particular (if $n=3$) the knot and link invariants. A majority of the standard notions of the corresponding theory appears naturally in this spectral sequence: say, the groups $E^{-i,i}_0$ (resp., $E^{-i,i+1}_0$) are generated by the "chord diagrams" (resp., "4-term relations" and trivial relations of "vanishing loops").

10. Spaces of curves without triple intersections, spaces of nonsingular complex surfaces. splittings for the homology of Lie groups, etc.

Bibliography:

  1. V. A. Vassiliev, Complements of Discriminants of Smooth Maps: Topology and Applications. (Rev. ed.) . Transl. of Math. Monographs, vol. 98, AMS, Providence, RI, 1994.