Recent Mathematical Tables
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by PDF
- Math. Comp. 5 (1951), 70-81 Request permission
Corrigendum: Math. Comp. 5 (1951), 184.
References
- M. Kraitchik, Recherches sur la Théorie des Nombres. Paris, 1924, v. 1, p. 80.
E. S. Pearson & C. Chandra Sekar, “The efficiency of statistical tools and a criterion for the rejection of outlying observations,” Biometrika, v. 28, 1936, p. 308-320.
- K. R. Nair, The distribution of the extreme deviate from the sample mean and its Studentized form, Biometrika 35 (1948), 118–144. MR 25125, DOI 10.1093/biomet/35.1-2.118 A. T. McKay, “The distribution of the difference between the extreme observation and the sample mean in samples of $n$ from a normal universe,” Biometrika, v. 27, 1935, p. 466-471. L. H. C. Tippett, “On the extreme individuals and the range of samples taken from a normal population,” Biometrika, v. 17, 1925, p. 364-387. B.A.A.S., Math. Tables, v. 1, 2nd ed., Cambridge, 1946, Tables XV and XVI. Karl Pearson & Alice Lee, “On the generalized probable error in multiple normal correlation,” Biometrika, v. 6, 1908, p. 59-68. See 1st ed. of above B.A.A.S. tables, 1931, p. xxvi-xxxv. Student, “New tables for testing the significance of observations,” Metron, v. 5, no. 3, 1925, p. 105-120.
- Otto Emersleben, Einige Identitäten für Epsteinsche Zetafunktionen 2. Ordnung, Math. Ann. 121 (1949), 103–106 (German). MR 31516, DOI 10.1007/BF01329619
Additional Information
- © Copyright 1951 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Math. Comp. 5 (1951), 70-81
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-51-99437-9