Publications Meetings The Profession Membership Programs Math Samplings Policy & Advocacy In the News About the AMS

Blog on Math Blogs
Mail to a friend · Print this article · Previous Columns 
Tony PhillipsTony Phillips' Take on Math in the Media
A monthly survey of math news

This month's topics:

The 3-body problem and free homotopy

"Three Classes of Newtonian Three-Body Planar Periodic Orbits" was the highlighted article in the Physical Review Letters index for the week ending March 15, 2013. The article was mentioned in Science on March 15 and on Science's webpage ("Physicists Discover a Whopping 13 New Solutions to Three-Body Problem", Jon Cartwright, March 8). Cartwright: "Can you predict how three objects will orbit each other in a repeating pattern? In the 300 years since this 'three-body problem' was first recognized, just three families of solutions have been found. Now, two physicists have discovered 13 new families." The authors (Milovan Šuvakov and Veljko Dmitrašinović of the Institute of Physics Belgrade) explain that they searched for periodic planar solutions involving three equal bodies and "collinear configurations with one body exactly in the middle between the other two, with vanishing angular momentum and vanishing time derivative of the hyperradius at the initial time." These restrictions cut the dimension of the parameter space of initial conditions down to two. In fact, as they set it up, Body$_1$ starts in the plane at coordinates $(-1,0)$, Body$_2$ at $(1,0)$ and Body$_3$ at the origin. Body$_1$ and Body$_2$ have the same initial velocity vector $(u,v)$ and Body$_3$ starts with $(-2u,-2v)$. The authors systematically explored $(u,v)$ space looking for conditions determining periodic orbits; using "steepest descent" they zeroed in on 15 pairs which gave orbits closing up (along with derivatives) to within one part in a million.

mothI orbit in plane yin-yang orbit in plane

Two of the periodic orbits discovered by Šuvakov and Dmitrašinović: "Moth I" and "Yin-yang 1a." Images courtesy of Milovan Šuvakov.

The idea of a topological classification of periodic solutions to the planar 3-body problem goes back to Richard Montgomery (UCSC) in 1998. Mathematically speaking, a closed orbit determines a closed curve in the space of planar triangles with one fixed vertex. Putting the fixed vertex at the origin and labeling the other two by complex numbers gives a curve $(z_1(t), z_2(t))$ in ${\bf C}^2$; factoring out the scale gives a curve $[z_1(t): z_2(t)]$ in the complex projective plane which must miss the three points $\{z_1 =0,$ $z_2=0,$ $z_1=z_2\}$ where two of the bodies collide. This is a curve in a 2-dimensional sphere with three deleted points, topologically equivalent to the authors' shape space.

mothI orbit on shape sphere yin-yang orbit on shape sphere

The curves in shape space corresponding to the Moth I and Yin-yang 1a orbits shown above. Images courtesy of Milovan Šuvakov.

Any closed curve in shape space is topologically characterized its free homotopy class; this can be represented by the pattern (up to cyclic permutation) of its windings about any two of the deleted points. With the symbols $a, A$ for counterclockwise (clockwise) winding about the one shown above on the front left, and $b, B$ for clockwise (counterclockwise) winding about the one on the right, the Moth I orbit corresponds to the word $aBABabABAb$, and Ying-yang 1a to $aBABababABAb$. From this point of view, the 15 solutions Šuvakov and Dmitrašinović discovered correspond to 13 distinct topological types. The entire collection is displayed, with animations, along with some of the previously known solutions on their website.

Percolation and fractal dimension

"Avoiding a Spanning Cluster in Percolation Models," by Y. S. Cho, S. Hwang, H. J. Herrmann and B. Kahng (Herrmann at ETH, the others at Seoul National University), appeared in Science on March 8, 2013. One family of percolation models examines the formation of a spanning cluster connecting two opposite sides of a system in Euclidean space, as new bonds are randomly added to the system. Their study by mathematical simulation dates back to Erdős and Rényi in 1960. Recently the ER model has been modified by imposing a rule that suppresses the formation of a large cluster. "Because of this suppressive bias, the percolation threshold is delayed; thus, when the giant cluster eventually emerges, it does so explosively." This leads to a phase transition, between the unconnected and connected states of the system. This article investigates the nature of this transition, in the case where $m$ random bonds are selected at each step, but bridge bonds (which would make the connection) are discarded (as long as this is possible), and one of the remaining is chosen at random to be added to the system. The "time" (actually, the ratio of occupied bonds to unoccupied bonds) at which it becomes impossible to choose $m$ non-bridge bonds is the percolation threshold $t_{cm}$; for $m>1$ this is larger than the percolation threshold $t_c = t_{c1}$ for ordinary percolation ($m=1$).

new bonds before t_c

An example where $m=2$. Here the square lattice has linear size $L=7$, spanning goes from left to right, and the system is in a non-critical state. The random process has produced two candidate bonds, $\sf{b_1}$ and $\sf{b_2}$. Since $\sf{b_2}$ is a bridge bond, $\sf{b_1}$ is selected at this step.

new bonds at t_c

Later in the evolution of the same system, beyond the critical time $t_{c2}$ when it first becomes possible to have two candidate bridge bonds. That has happened here. One will be chosen and a spanning cluster will be formed. Images courtesy of Byungnam Kahng.

The authors examine the dependence of $t_{cm}$ on $m$ (which is allowed to be non-integer), on $L$ (the linear size of the system) and on its dimension $d$. In particular they discover a critical value $m_c$ for the parameter $m$. For $m < m_c$, as $L$ increases, $t_{cm}(L)$ decreases and converges to $t_c$; while for $m > m_c$, as $L$ increases, $t_{cm}(L)$ increases and converges to 1. This critical value is related to the fractal dimension $d_{BB}$ of the set of bridge-bonds by $m_c = d/(d-d_{BB})$.

maximal islands

 

A two-dimensional system ($d=2$) with $L=300$ and $m=5$ is shown just before the percolation threshold $t_{c5}$. The set of bridge bonds has fractal dimension $d_{BB}=1.22$. Larger image. Image courtesy of Byungnam Kahng.

"The Math Problem in Good Will Hunting Is Easy"

Posted on Slate March 13, 2013 by David Haglund was a piece embedding a clip from Brady Haran's Numberphile math video collection. It's about the mathematics in the 1997 movie Good Will Hunting. In the clip, "James Grime, a mathematician at Cambridge University, argues that one of the math problems Will Hunting solves, posed by an MIT professor to his students as a challenge of epic proportions, really isn't that hard." The problem was to draw all the nonhomeomorphic irreducible trees with 10 vertices. Drawing those ten may be "easy," but how about proving that there are no others?

Tony Phillips
Stony Brook University
tony at math.sunysb.edu