More math into biology! That's the aim of a newNational Science Foundation initiative, "Quantitative Environmental andIntegrative Biology," recently announced, and reported in an article byRex Dalton in the 28 September 2000 Nature. Starting budget$ 3 million and scheduled to increase. One goal is toprovide tools for analyzing the large data sets produced byresearch in ecology. Another goalis to improve statistical techniques for studying species spreadover large geographical areas. Targeted sciences: population genetics, ecological system restoration, and animal physiology and behavior."Principal investigators are being encouraged to train undergraduates and graduates in the newtechniques, with a view to them becoming involved in the research. NSF officials see this as away to create a much-needed generation of scientists skilled in both biology and mathematics."
Math genes? The point is that there are many of them, andthat everyone has enough: "the capacity to do mathematics, at least throughhigh-school algebra and geometry." This is brought out in a charming andon-target piece "Finding your Inner Mathematician" by Keith Devlin in the 29 September 2000 Chronicle ofHigher Education. Devlin reminds us that math only requires "ninebasic mental abilities, which our ancestors developed thousands of yearsago ..." which he enumerates and describes. For example, # 4 is"A sense of cause and effect," and # 7 is "The ability tounderstand abstraction," which he describes "the key." There is a lovelyriff on "math as soap opera," but here are two nuggets from thisexcellent article. "Mathematicians don't have a different kind of brain.They have learned to use a standard-issue brain in a slightly differentway." "The real value of learning basic math skills ... is to make theabstract objects of mathematics become so familiar -and seem so real-that you can reason about them using the same mental capacities you useto reason about everyday things." (See Multiple Mathematical Intelligences in the What'sNew Archive for another take on the same phenomena.)
Retinal Calculus. It has been known that the retina containsdirection-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) each of which has a "preferred direction," and fires to report adark-light or light-dark separator moving by it in that direction.Motion in non-preferred directions gives much lower output. The cells are performing a kind of directional derivative.An explanation of the synaptic mechanisms involved is given by Rowland Taylor of Australian National University and co-authors ("Dendritic Computation of Direction Selectivity by Retinal Ganglion Cells, " in the September 29 2000 Science.)The authors show by a series of experiments with rabbit retinal cellsthat "the key mechanism underlying direction selectivity in DSGCs is spatially asymmetric inhibition, which counteracts excitation for motion in the null direction but not in the preferred direction." This paper was reviewed in a news piece (same issue) "A New Look at HowNeurons Compute" by Marcia Barinaga, who reports some dissent from theturtle people. The idea that image processingtakes place to some extent in the retina, rather than in the brain,dates back to the oft (but not here) cited 1959 article "What the Frog'sEye Tells the Frog's Mind" byLettvin, Maturana, McCullogh and Pitts,Proceedings of the IRE, Vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 1940-51.
SUNY at Stony Brook
Math in the Media Archive
Comments: Email Webmaster