Available in electronic format
Available in print format
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
ISSN 1088-6826 (e) ISSN 0002-9939 (p)
     

On Stone's theorem and the Axiom of Choice

Author(s): C. Good; I. J. Tree; W. S. Watson
Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1998), 1211-1218.
MSC (1991): Primary 54D20; Secondary 03E25
Retrieve article in: PDF
This article is available free of charge

Abstract | References | Similar articles | Additional information

Abstract: It is a well established fact that in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, Tychonoff's Theorem, the statement that the product of compact topological spaces is compact, is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice. On the other hand, Urysohn's Metrization Theorem, that every regular second countable space is metrizable, is provable from just the ZF axioms alone. A. H. Stone's Theorem, that every metric space is paracompact, is considered here from this perspective. Stone's Theorem is shown not to be a theorem in ZF by a forcing argument. The construction also shows that Stone's Theorem cannot be proved by additionally assuming the Principle of Dependent Choice.


References:

1.
Brunner N., The axiom of choice in topology, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 24 (1983), 305-317. MR 85j:54057
2.
Dieudonné J.A., Une généralisation des espaces compacts, J. Math. Pures. Appl. 23 (1944), 65-76. MR 7:134f
3.
van Douwen E.K., Horrors of topology without AC: a nonnormal orderable space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 95 (1985), 101-105. MR 87d:03130
4.
Good C. and Tree I. J., Continuing horrors of topology without choice, Top. Appl. 63 (1995), 79-90. MR 96f:54003
5.
Howard P.E., Rado's selection lemma does not imply the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem, Z. Math Logic Grundlag Math. 30 (1984), 129-132. MR 85d:03099
6.
Jech T., The Axiom of Choice, North Holland, Amsterdam 1973. MR 53:139

7.
Kunen K., Set Theory, An Introduction To Independence Proofs, North Holland, Amsterdam 1980. MR 82f:03001

8.
Mostowski A., On a problem of W. Kinna and K. Wagner, Colloq. Math. 6 (1958), 207-208. MR 20:6980
9.
Potter M. D., Sets, An Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York 1990. MR 92c:04001

10.
Rudin M. E., A new proof that metric spaces are paracompact, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (1969), 603. MR 38:5170

11.
Stone A.H., Paracompactness and product spaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1948), 977-982. MR 10:204c

12.
Willard S., General Topology, Addison-Wesley 1970. MR 41:9173


Similar Articles:

Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (1991): 54D20, 03E25

Retrieve articles in all Journals with MSC (1991): 54D20, 03E25


Additional Information:

C. Good
Affiliation: School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, England
Email: c.good@bham.ac.uk

I. J. Tree
Affiliation: 62 Arle Gardens, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL51 8HR, England

W. S. Watson
Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
Email: watson@mathstat.yorku.ca

DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9939-98-04163-X
PII: S 0002-9939(98)04163-X
Received by editor(s): March 27, 1996
Received by editor(s) in revised form: September 17, 1996
Communicated by: Andreas R. Blass
Copyright of article: Copyright 1998, American Mathematical Society


  AMS Website Logo Small Comments: webmaster@ams.org
© Copyright 2009, American Mathematical Society
Privacy Statement
Search the AMSPowered by Google