Brie Finegold summarizes blogs on visualizing big numbers and on Martin Gardner:
"The Best Graphics That Make You Realize You Don't Know How Big Anything Actually Is," by Rose Eveleth. Smithsonian.com blog: Smartnews, 22 October 2012 4:38 p.m.
Piggybacking off Steven Strogatz's blog post on Visualizing Vastness, Rose Eveleth summarizes Strogatz's thoughts on why it is that we find it so difficult to comprehend large numbers such as those that measure distances between planets. She then goes on to list links to several descendants of the 1977 Powers of Ten short film that, as she writes, "melted the face off" anyone who watched it at the time. The film started with an aerial view of a couple picnicking in the park and zoomed out (and in) scaling by powers of ten in an effort to drive home the idea of exponential growth and decay. Even now, that video is instructive, but newer graphics such as one from XKCD, a beloved math and sciencethemed comic, have thrown their hats into the ring. Probably the most impressive are the two interactive sites Scale of Universe and Magnify the Universe. The latter has crystalclear graphics that really suck in the participant. Both operate by the user dragging a slider all around to move both up and down through the powers of ten.
"Flexagon but not forgotten: Celebrating Martin Gardner's Birthday," by Evelyn Lamb. Scientific American Observations, 19 October 2012;
"Happy birthday, Martin Gardner (19142010)," by Daina Taimina. Hyperbolic Crochet, 21 October 2012.
Famed Scientific American columnist and puzzlemaster Martin Gardner would have turned 98 on October 21. In tribute to his impact on the layperson's attitude towards mathematics, Vi Hart made a series of three wonderful videos about Hexaflexagonspieces of paper folded and taped together to form a flat and malleable mobius strip that seems to reveal new "sides" at every turn. The blogger Lamb gives some of the highlights of the playful videos including links to more mathematics, and she also quotes the fasttalking Vi Hart describing Gardner as a "mathinspiration grandfather." Dana Taimina, who is wellknown for crocheting extensive models of hyperbolic surfaces and creating fiber art inspired by lowdimensional topology also paid tribute to Gardner by posting a puzzle in the form of an online gallery of paintings that "all have something in common." The challenge is to find out what. She also describes how she was inspired as a young girl in Latvia by one of only two books of his that had been translated into her language. She went on to become a math teacher and lover of recreational mathematics, and to earn her doctorate. It seems that Gardner was in the mathinspiration genealogy of Taimina as well.
 Brie Finegold
"A Mathematician Hacked Into Google Because He Thought It Was Part Of A Job Interview," by Geoffrey Ingersoll. Business Insider, 25 October 2012.
When mathematician Zachary Harris received an email from Google he wasn't sure if it was real or a scam. The email's header information seemed legitimate but he noticed that "the cryptographic key meant to verify the email wasn't using encryption up to standards." Ror its own digital signatures, Google was using a 512bit key rather than the standard and far more secure 1,024bit key. In response to the email Harris then sent his own email to Google CEO Larry Pageassuming the identity of Google cofounder Sergey Brin. When Google caught on to the discovery the company upgraded its encryption. Harris told Wired, "I love factoring numbers. So I thought this was fun. I really wanted to solve their puzzle and prove I could do it." This story was picked up in other media and blogs, including "How a Google Headhunter's EMail Unraveled a Massive Net Security Hole," by Kim Zetter, Wired, 24 October 2012 and Google Says Google Apps Domains Were Protected From Massive Spoofing Vulnerability," by Elise Ackerman. Forbes, 29 October 2012.
 Annette Emerson
"The maths that made Voyager possible," by Christopher Riley and Dallas Campbell. BBC Four, 22 October 2012.
Voyager didn't write the song "Don't Stop Believin'" (that was Journey) or the song "Cold As Ice" (that was Foreigner). That's because Voyager isn't a rock band at all, but a pair of unmanned space probes that are rapidly approaching the edge of the solar system. But even if you never thought Voyager was a hit band from the 70s, this lovely article on the mathematics behind the Voyager program will edify and entertain you. For example, it reveals that Voyager's flight path is one of hundreds that were drawn up in 1962 (by hand) by NASA summer intern Michael Minovitch, and promptly ignored for three years. Minovitch, a UCLA graduate student in mathematics, had been stealing time from his qual prep to study the threebody problem on UCLA's IBM 7090, the fastest computer on Earth at the time. He discovered that an object flying close to a planet would experience acceleration due to that planet's gravitational force. Such acceleration could be used in a "gravity assist" or "slingshot maneuver" to accelerate a spacecraft away from the sun, propellantfree. Minovitch spent the summer of 1962 interning in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, repeating his simulations with more accurate data. But then he ran out of funding, and the handdrawn trajectories he used to sell his ideas were unable to distract the rest of JPL from the Apollo Project. It was the work of another summer intern, spacecraft engineer Gary Flandro, that lent the project that became Voyager some urgency. Flandro was also thinking about the threebody problem, but his practical perspective led him to chart the trajectories of the planets. Flandro realized that in the late 70s, just as Journey was pumping out their highestgrossing album, Escape, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, and Neptune would all be on the same side of the solar systeman ideal configuration for a spacecraft to make its own escape, shooting past all four planets in only 12 years. Flandro's realization came not a moment too soon, considering the inertia of government bureaucracy, because the window opened up by the planets' cancan wouldn't reopen for another 176 years.
The Voyager Project, consisting of two probes, combines Minovitch's idea of a planetary slingshot with Flandro's idea of a grand planetary tour. Launched in 1977, it's the result of long years of lobbying by Minovitch, Flandro, and influential space advisor Maxwell Hunter, and not a little planning. Voyager 2 ("the tourist") was launched first. It has completed its flyby of the outer solar system, and is now approaching what's known as the termination shockthe ellipse where the solar wind first starts to slow from its speed of 1 billion miles an hourabout eight years after its younger sibling. Voyager 1 ("the slingshot") skipped the four planets, making a beeline for the edge of the solar system, and becoming the furthest manmade object from the earth. Voyager 1 is close to crossing the heliopausethe limit of the solar windand to becoming the first human artifact outside the heliospherethe bubble of charged particles blown into interstellar space by the solar wind. The data from the two probes have yielded countless discoveries, such as the fact that the solar system is asymmetrical, and the presence of giant magnetic bubbles in the heliosphere. And to think that it all started with a couple of interns. I guess that's why they say... don't stop believin'. There's more to read on Wikipedia and NASA's homepage.
 Ben Polletta
"Economics Nobel Honors Matchmaking Finesse," by Yudhijit Bhattacharjee. Science, 19 October 2012, page 314.
This year's Nobel Prize for Economics rewards two scientists who've used game theory to better understand pairwise matching  and to improve how residency programs match with residents, how high schools match with their students, and even how kidney donors match with their recipients. The winners of the prize are Lloyd Shapley, who along with late mathematician and economist David Gale developed the socalled GaleShapley algorithm of pairwise matching (the Nobel is not awarded posthumously), and Alvin Roth, who showed that the National Residency Matching Program was unwittingly applying the algorithm, and then went on to improve the NRMP by wittingly using it. Shapley and Gale's algorithm was originally formulated at UCLA, in the case of 10 men and 10 women trying to pair off as married couples. In this scenario, each man proposes to his first choice, and each woman rejects all but her top choice out of her suitors, whose proposal she holds without accepting or rejecting. Then, each man without a proposal in play proposes to his second choice, the women hold onto their new favorite proposal, and a new crop of untethered bachelors proposes to their third choice. Eventually, the matchings stabilize (you might like to get a few friends and a justice of the peace together and try it for yourself), although Shapley and Gale showed that the matchings are more favorable to the proposers than the proposes. Roth, who calls himself a "market designer" and is currently making his way from Harvard to Stanford, used the GaleShapley algorithm to make the NRMP more friendly to dualdoctor couples, and to improve New York City's specialized high school admissions system, reducing the number of students who end up at schools they haven't ranked by 90%. Now if only he could do something about matching high school students with pleasant high school social experiences. (Photo: Lloyd S. Shapley, courtesy of UCLA.)
[Editor's note: Read more about matchings in two AMS Feature Columns, "School Choice" and "Mathematical Marriages."]
 Ben Polletta
"Penn State offensive lineman's life is proof that higher mathematics and college football can mix," by Mark Dent. Pittsburgh PostGazette, 17 October 2012.
Above: John Urschel (number 8^{2}), playing against Temple University. At right: John out of uniform. Photos: Penn State Athletic Communications. 
The sports section of the Pittsburgh PostGazette has a portrait of John Urschel, who is a Penn State offensive lineman and a rising star in the mathematics department. Not only is Urschel a starting guard on the Penn State offensive line, he is also on course to graduate with a 4.0 grade average in mathematics and is working on research projects generally reserved for students with much more experience. Urschel has been working on a research paper on celestial mechanics with Professor Vadim Kaloshin, who now teaches at the University of Maryland. Together they have discovered the possibility of asteroids in the belt around Jupiter crashing into Mars. Urschel is also working with Xiaozhe Hu, a postdoc, on a research paper about parallel computing. After Penn State, Urschel plans on playing professionally if he can make the NFL after which he wants to get his doctorate preferably at Stanford, MIT or Princeton.
 Baldur Hedinsson
"Mathematics and What It Means to Be Human, Part 1," by Michele Osherow and Manil Suri. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 12 October 2012, pages A3334.
The Chronicle's advice section has an essay by Michele Osherow and Manil Suri (left) on their experience teaching a freshman seminar on mathematics and what it means to be human. Manil Suri is a mathematician at the University of MarylandBaltimore and Michele Osherow is an English professor at the university and resident dramaturg at the Folger Theatre, in Washington. Their collaboration started when Suri acted as a mathematics consultant for the Folger's Theatre production of Tom Stoppard's Arcadia, a play that explores the relationship between past and present through poetry and mathematics. Thirteen incoming freshmen from the Humanities Scholars program attended this unconventional seminar. To present the students with the joy and beauty of math they read among other things Mark Haddon's The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime, Shakespeare's King Lear, and they also watched the film Pi by Darren Aronofsky.
This is the first of a threepart article. Part 2 and Part 3 are also posted online. Photo: José Villarrubia (Parts 2 and 3?)
 Baldur Hedinsson
"A mathematician and computer scientist with area ties wins a MacArthur fellowship," by Tom Avril. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 3 October 2012;
"Israeli mathematician among 'genius grant' recipients," by Asher Zeiger. The Times of Israel, 3 October 2012.

Two mathematicians, Daniel Spielman and Maria Chudnovsky (pictured above), were among the 23 recipients of the 2012 MacArthur Fellowships. The prizes, which the MacArthur Foundation awards annually based on anonymous nominations of individuals who excel in medicine, science, and the arts, include $500,000 over five years for each honoree. Spielman, a Philadelphia native and professor of computer science and mathematics at Yale University, was honored for his work on methods for solving linear equations with large numbers of variables, which could be applied to helping computers learn to recognize speech and images. Chudnovsky, who was born in the Soviet Union, raised in Israel, and works as an assistant professor at Columbia University, received a fellowship based on her work in graph theory, in particular her solution to a 40yearold theory on graph classification. For more information, check out the profiles for Spielman and Chudnovsky on the MacArthur Foundation website. Evelyn Lamb, 2012 AMSAAAS Media Fellow who now writes for Scientific American, also wrote about the two winners in "Perfect Graphs and Perfect Harmony: Meet 2 of the 2012 MacArthur 'Genius' Fellows."
 Lisa DeKeukeleare
"Mandelbrot: Art, math, science, and works in progress," by John Timmer. Ars Technica, 1 October 2012.
Consider an image of the Mandelbrot set: "iconic and permanently connected with the man who identified it," yet generally "dismissed by art critics as kitsch, and divorced from the underlying mathematics that generated it." Now, "The Islands of Benoît Mandelbrot: Fractals, Chaos, and the Materiality of Thinking," an exhibit at the Bard Graduate Center in Manhattan, "is attempting to place the Mandelbrot set and other mathematical constructs back in their original context: one that's part of a long history of visualizations playing a key part in the creative process of math and science."
The oldest works include sketches by Edward Lorenz of threedimensional representations of chaotic attractors, as well as some drawings and "a simple visualization, done with an analog computer" by Otto Rössler. The majority of the work displayed here is Mandelbrot's, including large numbers of handdrawn sketches and computer printouts, as well as photographs, objects, and films. This exhibit, curated by Visiting Assistant Professor Nina Samuel, runs through January 27, 2013. Image: Quarternion, 1983. Computergenerated prints on photographic paper. Benoît Mandelbrot and Alan Norton, programmer. Collection Aliette Mandelbrot. Courtesy of the Bard Graduate Center (along with much help from John Timmer).
 Claudia Clark
Math Digest Archives
 2010  2009 
2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998  1997  1996  1995
Click here for a list of links to web pages of publications covered in the Digest. 