Visit our **AMS COVID-19 page** for educational and professional resources and scheduling updates

Mail to a friend · Print this article · Previous Columns |

Tony Phillips' Take on Math in the Media A monthly survey of math news |

This month's topics:

The Geometry of Musical Chords

This is the title of a report in the July 7 2006 *Science*, written by Dmitri Tymoczko, Professor of Music at Princeton. The abstract begins: "A musical chord can be represented as a point in a geometrical space called an orbifold. Line segments represent mappings from the notes of one chord to those of another." The simplest example of this representation is for the case of intervals, or two-note chords. As Tymoczko says, "Human pitch perception is both logarithmic and periodic." We judge the distance between tones in terms of the ratio of their pitches, and identify tones when that ratio is 2. So the psychological space of tones is a circle, where we can mark off 12 equidistant points corresponding to the pitch classes C, C#, D, ... , A#, B. It is convenient to identify this circle with **T**^{1} = **R**/12**Z** and to place the equal-tempered pitches at the integral points 0 (C), ... 11 (B). Then the space of pairs of tones is the torus **T**^{1} × **T**^{1} and the space of intervals (unordered pairs) is the quotient of this torus by the relation (*x*,*y*) ~ (*y*,*x*). The result is a Möbius strip, a manifold with boundary and thus an *orbifold*.

The identification (*x*,*y*) ~ (*y*,*x*) makes the torus into a Möbius strip, a manifold with boundary.

Here is how the intervals appear on the Möbius strip:

The 2-note chords, or intervals, as they appear on the Möbius strip of unordered tone pairs. "t" is 10 and "e" is 11. 70=07 corresponds to the fifth chord C-G. Transposition corresponds to sideways motion. "Voice leading," i.e. motion through chords, is represented by paths on the surface: e.g. C-G → D-F# is represented by the arrow 70 → 16. Note that the voice leading C-C# &rarr C#-C reflects off the upper boundary. Image courtesy Dmitri Tymoczko.

For three or four-note chords the topology becomes more complicated. For example three-note chords live on the 3-dimensional orbifold constructed by taking a 3-dimensional prism with base a triangle, twisting the base so as to cyclically permute the vertices, and identifying it with the opposite face. But it makes musical sense: "Chords that divide the octave evenly lie at the center of the orbifold and are surrounded by the familiar sonorities of Western tonality."

The 3-dimensional orbifold representing the space of 3-note chords. "Chords that divide the octave evenly lie at the center of the orbifold and are surrounded by the familiar sonorities of Western tonality." Image courtesy Dmitri Tymoczko.

It is clearly Tymoczko's intent for these representations to serve not only as a tool in musical analysis, but also as a stimulus for new directions in composition. More information, including free ChordGeometries software, on his website.

Epithelial topologyEpithelial tissue is typically a 2-dimensional array of cells. Topologically the average cell shape must be a hexagon. Remarkably, an identical, assymetric distribution of polygonal shapes shows up over an enormous range of organisms. *Drosophila* is a fly, *Xenopus* is a frog and *Hydra* is a tiny fresh-water relative of jellyfish.

"*Drosophila* wing disc (pink), *Xenopus* tail epidermis (green) and *Hydra* epidermis (blue) all exhibit a similar non-gaussian distribution of epithelial polygons with less than 50% hexagonal cells and high (and asymmetric) percentages of pentagonal and heptagonal cells. The inset indicates relative phylogenetic positions for *Drosophila, Xenopus * and *Hydra*." Yellow bars represent the theoretical distribution derived in this article (see below). Image from *Nature* **442** 1038-1041, used with permission.

A theoretical explanation for this phenomenon is given in "The emergence of geometric order in proliferating metazoan epithelia," by Matthew Gibson (Harvard) and collaborators, in *Nature* for August 31, 2006. It relies on the observation that when a cell in a 2-dimensional array divides, each of its daughters typically has one fewer neighbor, while two of its neighbors pick up an extra side.

Typically the daughters of a hexagonal cell are pentagons, while two hexagonal neighbors become heptagons. Image from *Nature* **442** 1038-1041, used with permission.

To study the way the distribution of polygonal types changes under repeated subdivisions, Gibson and his colleagues axiomatize the situation (each of these statements is given an experimental justification).

- cells are polygons with a minimum of four sides.
- cells do not re-sort.
- mitotic siblings retain a common junctional interface.
- cells have asynchronous but roughly uniform cell cycle times.
- cleavage planes always cut a side rather than a vertex of the mother polygon.
- mitotic cleavage orientation randomly distributes existing tricellular junctions to both daughter cells.

They use these axioms to construct a Markov-chain model for the distribution of polygonal types. This model predicts the yellow bars in our first image, and also predicts a rapid evolution to this distribution regardless of the initial set of polygonal types.

Markov-chain model for the change in polygonal type from one generation to the next. Image from *Nature* **442** 1038-1041, used with permission.

Barry Mazur has a "News and Views" piece in the September 7 2006 *Nature* about recent steps towards the proof of the Sato-Tate conjecture, which predicts the distribution of the error terms in good approximations for solutions of combinatorial number-theoretic problems. These are not the errors that plague natural scientists measuring things out in the field, but the report is a work of art. Mazur illustrates the conjecture with a nice, and elementary, example. The problem here is to count the number *N*(*p*) of ways a prime number *p*can be written as a sum of 24 squares of integers. Note that zero and negative numbers are allowed to participate, and that all permutations of the terms in a sum must be counted as different "ways." So *N(2)* is already 1,104. Now there exists a good approximation *A*(*p*) for *N*(*p*): , good in the sense that the error scales like the square root of *N*; in fact there is an explicit least upper bound for the error as a function of *p*: .

For problems like this, the Sato-Tate conjecture predicts that the distribution of the scaled error

should be governed by the distribution , whose graph is a semi-circle normalized to have area 1.

The scaled error distribution for *N*(*p*) predicted by the Sato-Tate conjecture (red curve) and the actual distribution for primes less than one million. Image from *Nature*, **443** 38-40, used with permission.

For this case of the conjecture the evidence is excellent but there is as yet no proof. Mazur mentions a class of problems, related to elliptic curves, where the conjecture has in fact been proved (through the efforts of his Harvard colleague Richard Taylor and Taylor's collaborators). As Mazur explains it, "The proof came by combining some wonderful pieces of mathematics, and the key to it is all is so-called representation theory. This branch of mathematics, in its various guises, studies abstract groups by representing them as groups of linear transformations of vector spaces. By understanding the profound number-theoretic structure behind enough of the symmetric tensor powers of a certain representation of a certain group, one can compute the probability distribution of the corresponding scaled error terms, and so confirm the Sato-Tate conjecture."

Mazur concludes: "This is a magnificent achievement for at least two reasons. First, the method brings synthetic unity to deep results in quite distinct mathematical fields. ...Second, the work answers a question of delicate nature. Number theorists have long held the opinion that the 'error terms', despite the pejorative name, have a mesmerizingly rich structure ... and that the keys to some of the deepest issues in their subject lie hidden in that structure."

Tony Phillips

Stony Brook University

tony at math.sunysb.edu