Publications Meetings The Profession Membership Programs Math Samplings Policy & Advocacy In the News About the AMS


Feature Column

Diagonals: Part II


2. Orthogonal polygons

Two natural outgrowths of the proof of the Chvátal Art Gallery Theorem were to see how the ideas in the proof could be extended to get more general results, and to see how the number of guards needed might change when working with polygons with special characteristics. More specifically, one line of research has concerned seeing whether special classes of polygons require fewer guards. For example, what can be said about simple polygons such as the one below, where all interior angles are either 90 degrees or 270 degrees? Such polygons are known as orthogonal polygons or rectilinear polygons.
 


Orthogonal polygon

Figure 1

 

Other orthogonal polygons, which are shown below, create rather different visual impressions:

 

Orthogonal polygon
Figure 2


Orthogonal polygon
Figure 3
 

Yet, you can verify that if one is allowed to locate a guard within the interior of an edge then only one guard is needed for each of the polygons in Figures 2 and 3. However, whereas Figure 2 can not be guarded by one guard located at a vertex, Figure 3 can. Below is a polygon which suggests a family of orthogonal polygons that needs an increasing number of vertex guards. Usingthe number of guards that are needed for the polygon in Figure 4, can you makea conjecture concerning how many vertex guards are sometimes necessary and alwayssufficient for an orthogonal polygon?
 

Orthogonal polygon
Figure 4

  1. Introduction
  2. Orthogonal polygons
  3. Guarding orthogonal art galleries
  4. Entering new territory
  5. References

Welcome to the
Feature Column!

These web essays are designed for those who have already discovered the joys of mathematics as well as for those who may be uncomfortable with mathematics.
Read more . . .

Search Feature Column

Feature Column at a glance


Show Archive

Browse subjects