Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Necessary conditions for optimal control problems with state constraints
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by R. B. Vinter and H. Zheng PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350 (1998), 1181-1204 Request permission

Abstract:

Necessary conditions of optimality are derived for optimal control problems with pathwise state constraints, in which the dynamic constraint is modelled as a differential inclusion. The novel feature of the conditions is the unrestrictive nature of the hypotheses under which these conditions are shown to be valid. An Euler Lagrange type condition is obtained for problems where the multifunction associated with the dynamic constraint has values possibly unbounded, nonconvex sets and satisfies a mild ‘one-sided’ Lipschitz continuity hypothesis. We recover as a special case the sharpest available necessary conditions for state constraint free problems proved in a recent paper by Ioffe. For problems where the multifunction is convex valued it is shown that the necessary conditions are still valid when the one-sided Lipschitz hypothesis is replaced by a milder, local hypothesis. A recent ‘dualization’ theorem permits us to infer a strengthened form of the Hamiltonian inclusion from the Euler Lagrange condition. The necessary conditions for state constrained problems with convex valued multifunctions are derived under hypotheses on the dynamics which are significantly weaker than those invoked by Loewen and Rockafellar to achieve related necessary conditions for state constrained problems, and improve on available results in certain respects even when specialized to the state constraint free case. Proofs make use of recent ‘decoupling’ ideas of the authors, which reduce the optimization problem to one to which Pontryagin’s maximum principle is applicable, and a refined penalization technique to deal with the dynamic constraint.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (1991): 49K24
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (1991): 49K24
Additional Information
  • R. B. Vinter
  • Affiliation: Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2BT, UK
  • Email: r.vinter@ic.ac.uk
  • H. Zheng
  • Affiliation: Department of Business Studies, University of Edinburgh, 50 George Square, Edinburgh EH9 9JY, Scotland, UK
  • Email: zheng@maths.ed.ac.uk
  • Received by editor(s): May 6, 1996
  • Additional Notes: This research was carried out with financial support provided by EPSRC
  • © Copyright 1998 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350 (1998), 1181-1204
  • MSC (1991): Primary 49K24
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-98-02129-1
  • MathSciNet review: 1458337