Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Approximation using scattered shifts of a multivariate function
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Ronald DeVore and Amos Ron PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 6205-6229 Request permission

Abstract:

The approximation of a general $d$-variate function $f$ by the shifts $\phi (\cdot -\xi )$, $\xi \in \Xi \subset \mathbb {R}^d$, of a fixed function $\phi$ occurs in many applications such as data fitting, neural networks, and learning theory. When $\Xi =h\mathbb {Z}^d$ is a dilate of the integer lattice, there is a rather complete understanding of the approximation problem using Fourier techniques. However, in most applications, the center set $\Xi$ is either given, or can be chosen with complete freedom. In both of these cases, the shift-invariant setting is too restrictive. This paper studies the approximation problem in the case that $\Xi$ is arbitrary. It establishes approximation theorems whose error bounds reflect the local density of the points in $\Xi$. Two different settings are analyzed. The first occurs when the set $\Xi$ is prescribed in advance. In this case, the theorems of this paper show that, in analogy with the classical univariate spline approximation, an improved approximation occurs in regions where the density is high. The second setting corresponds to the problem of nonlinear approximation. In that setting the set $\Xi$ can be chosen using information about the target function $f$. We discuss how to ‘best’ make these choices and give estimates for the approximation error.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Ronald DeVore
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
  • Email: rdevore@math.tamu.edu
  • Amos Ron
  • Affiliation: Computer Science Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
  • Email: amos@cs.wisc.edu
  • Received by editor(s): February 17, 2008
  • Published electronically: July 15, 2010
  • Additional Notes: This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research Contracts ONR-N00014-08-1-1113; the Army Research Office Contracts DAAD 19-02-1-0028, W911NF-05-1-0227, and W911NF-07-1-0185; the National Institute of General Medical Sciences under Grant NIH-1-R01-GM072000-01; and the National Science Foundation under Grants DMS-0221642, DMS-9872890, DMS-354707, DBI-9983114, ANI-0085984, DMS-0602837 and DMS-0915231
  • © Copyright 2010 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 6205-6229
  • MSC (2010): Primary 41A15, 41A46, 41A25, 68T05
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2010-05070-6
  • MathSciNet review: 2678971