Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Atlas of products for wave-Sobolev spaces on $\mathbb {R}^{1+3}$
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Piero D’Ancona, Damiano Foschi and Sigmund Selberg PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 31-63

Abstract:

The wave-Sobolev spaces $H^{s,b}$ are $L^2$-based Sobolev spaces on the Minkowski space-time $\mathbb {R}^{1+n}$, with Fourier weights adapted to the symbol of the d’Alembertian. They are a standard tool in the study of regularity properties of nonlinear wave equations, and in such applications the need arises for product estimates in these spaces. Unfortunately, it seems that with every new application some estimates come up which have not yet appeared in the literature, and then one has to resort to a set of well-established procedures for proving the missing estimates. To relieve the tedium of having to constantly fill in such gaps “by hand”, we make here a systematic effort to determine the complete set of estimates in the bilinear case. We determine a set of necessary conditions for a product estimate $H^{s_1,b_1} \cdot H^{s_2,b_2} \hookrightarrow H^{-s_0,-b_0}$ to hold. These conditions define a polyhedron $\Omega$ in the space $\mathbb {R}^6$ of exponents $(s_0,s_1,s_2,b_0,b_1,b_2)$. We then show, in space dimension $n=3$, that all points in the interior of $\Omega$, and all points on the faces minus the edges, give product estimates. We can also allow some but not all points on the edges, but here we do not claim to have the sharp result. The corresponding results for $n=2$ and $n=1$ will be published elsewhere.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2010): 35L05, 46E35
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 35L05, 46E35
Additional Information
  • Piero D’Ancona
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, I-00185 Rome, Italy
  • Email: dancona@mat.uniroma1.it
  • Damiano Foschi
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Ferrara, Via Macchiavelli 35, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
  • Email: damiano.foschi@unife.it
  • Sigmund Selberg
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
  • Email: sselberg@math.ntnu.no
  • Received by editor(s): March 26, 2009
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: October 7, 2009
  • Published electronically: August 9, 2011
  • Additional Notes: This paper was written as part of the international research program on Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations at the Centre for Advanced Study at the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters in Oslo during the academic year 2008–2009.
  • © Copyright 2011 P. D’Ancona, D. Foschi, S. Selberg
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 31-63
  • MSC (2010): Primary 35L05, 46E35
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2011-05250-5
  • MathSciNet review: 2833576