# April 1984 Council Minutes

APRIL 1984 COUNCIL MINUTES

The Council met on 5 April 1984, at 7:05 PM, in Room 210-214 of the Center for
Continuing Education on the Campus of the University of Notre Dame in Notre,
Dame, IN.  Members present were S. Armentrout, H. Bass, D. L. Burkholder, P.L.
Duren, R.M. Fossum, S.J. Friedlander, W. Gautschi, P.R.  Halmos. M. Jerison, I.
Kaplanski, M.S. Montgomery, E. Pitcher, J.B. Robinson, and J. Jerry Uhl, Jr.
Also present were L.K. Durst, R. Hahn, W.J. Leveque, C. McConway, and J. L.
Selfridge.  Those present by invitation were F. Browder, F. Gehring, J.E.
Kister, and O.C. McGehee.  President Robinson was in the chair.

At the beginning of the meeting, J.L. Selfridge introduced Jane E. Kister,
Associate Executive Editor of MR.

MINUTES

1.1 COUNCIL MINUTES OF 7 AUGUST 1983.  These minutes had been distributed by
mail.  The minute 4.1 item 8, should read as follows:

8. INCREASE some conference registration fees.  There has been two sorts of
fees, a long standing social fee covering coffee breaks and any planned
group parties, and a more recent registration fee.  If the conference is to
include proceedings, the registration fee is increased to cover the purchase.

With this correction, the minutes were approved.

1.2 MINUTES OF COUNCIL BUSINESS BY MAIL OF 20 FEBRUARY 1984.  The attached
minute shows that Hyman Bass was elected to the EC for a four year term.

OFFICERS

5.1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY;  A slightly edited version of the report is
attached.  In the discussion there was consensus that no decision should
be made about Spring meetings until matters related to the Summer Meeting
(see 8.2) are settled.

5.2 REPORT OF THE TREASURER.  The audited report for 1983 is attached.

COMMITTEES AND BOARDS

4.1 NOMINATIONS:  The Nominating Committee proposed  names for various offices
in the election of 1984.  The Council then nominated the following persons:

Vice President		Linda Preiss Rothschild
Secretary			Everett Pitcher
(1 position)
Associate Secretary	Frank T. Birtel
(2 positions)		W. Wistar Comfort
Treasurer			Franklin P. Peterson
(1 position)
Associate Treasurer	Steve Armentrout
(1 position)

Trustee			Lee P. Neuwirth
(1 position)		Ramesh A. Gangolli

Editorial Committees
BULLETIN			Calvin C. Moore
COLLOQUIUM		Raoul H. Bott
MATH. REVIEWS		Morton Lowengrub
MATH. SURVEYS		M. Susan Montgmery
MATH. OF COMPUTATION	Donald Goldfarb
PROCEEDINGS		Donald S. Passman

Committee to Monitor Problems
in Communication		Floyd L. Williams
(2 positions)

MEMBER-AT-LARGE		A.T. Bharucha-Reid
(5 positons)		Daniel M. Burns
Joseph B. Keller
Harvey B. Keynes
Carl Pomerance
Michael C. Reed
Audrey A. Terras

All persons named had agreed to be candidates and to serve if elected.

The agendum leading to the following  minute was presented late and was
accepted.

4.2  RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP:  The Committee on the AMS Research Fellowship made
two suggestions for slight modification of the terms of the fellowship.

1.  That it be for persons 5 to 10 years past the Ph.
(or equivalent) degree, rather than 4 to 10.  The intent
and effect is that the period of eligibility not overlap
with that of the NSF Postdoctoral fellowship.

2.  That the candidate show the equivalent of three full
years postdoctoral teaching experience, rather than two.

The report of the Committee is attached.

The two recommendations were approved.  Moreover, the Council recommended that
the stipend be set at $30,000, for nine months rather than eleven. 4.3 SCIENCE POLICY COMMITTEE: The report of Professor Felix Browder, Chairman is attached. OLD BUSINESS 8.1 INFORMATION OF INTEREST: Under this heading, the Council of 24 January 1984, (see minute 9.4) authorized "the distribution through the 'local information table' of announcements submitted by participants in the meeting, of local events of a non-mathematical nature". The Secretary noted in the minute that, insofar as this resolution applied to joint meetings with the MAA, that group should be consulted. Indeed, subsequently, they had been, but will not be able to respond definitively at least until the August 1984 meeting of their Board of Governors. 8.2 SUMMER MEETINGS: The Council of 24 January 1984, went on record in favor of cancelling summer meetings beyond the one already contracted for 1984 and recognized both the necessity of consulting the MAA and its obligations to the MAA, particularly with respect to the 1985 meeting. (See minutes 9.1 and 9.2 of 24 January 1984.) The initital response of the MAA is given in the attached letter from Kenneth A. Ross, Secretary. The following paragraph is an extract from a letter from H. Rossi to the Secretary. The Council has to be reminded over and over again that the majority of AMS members are non-research mathematicians with, however, an interest in current mathematics. Without the latter, they would be members of some other society. Most of these people have obligations which make attendance at the winter meeting difficult; on the other hand, the summer meeting is easier. The summer institutes and other research conferences held during the summer are not appropriate for these mathematicians. I think, by appealing to these members, we can revitalize the summer meetings, increase attendance, and stop losing money. The special sessions, colloquium lectures and invited speakers should be selected more for breadth of appeal, rather than excellence in mathematics (for the summer sessions). We should have more expository series of lectures, like the first two colloquium lectures. We should more actively encourage sessions for contributed papers, or outside contributions to special sessions to get more members actively involved. The Agenda & Budget Committee recommended rescinding the Council action. In response to the specific request that the Summer Meeting of 1985 be held, the Secretary consulted with other officers of the Society and then assured the MAA that the 1985 meeting would go forward as planned. As to the cancellation of later meetings, the Secretary was of the opinion that the financial obstacles could be overcome, particularly with the proferred financial cooperation of the MAA. With this in mind, the Secretary was also of the opinion that these meetings should be continued for their scientific value to the membership and the mathematical community. Thus, he moved that the Council delay the effective operation of the resolution of 24 January 1984, until after the Summer Meeting of 1985, when the finances of the meetings of 1984 and 1985 under increased registration fees can be examined. The motion was passed. The agendum leading to the following minute was presented late and was accepted. 8.3 UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATION OF RESEARCH GRANTS; At its meeting of 24 January 1984, the Council considered a proposed policy by the Polytechnic Institute of New York that NSF grants that are ordinarily regarded as being for two months of summer research be used for one month of summer research and a reduction in teaching load of three hours in one semester. This appears to divert funds from the principal investigator to the University with little compensating advantage to the former. A Letter to the Editor from Lesley Sibner, with comment, and an extract from the report of the Secretary on the Louisville Council are attached. In the attached letter from Lesley Sibner, it is stated that the information received by the Council turned out to be incorrect and that a similar policy is still in effect. The Council passed the following resolution: The Council of the AMS reiterates its strong opposition to the policy of the administration of the Polytechnic Institute of New York concerning salaries paid by NSF grants, as contained in Dean Pearce's memo of 10/24/83, and believes it is contrary to the interst of scientific research. As Dr. E.F. Infante, Director of the Division of Mathematical Sciences of the NSF has stated, "the implementation of a rigid policy of research management of any university which is perceived by individual reserachers as not promoting an environment beneficial to research and scholarly endeavors cannot be welcomed." At the same time, the Council requested the Secretary to verify the facts and the current developments of the Polytechnic Institute of New York before sending copies of the resolution to administrators at the Institute. [Accordingly, on 9 April 1984, the Secretary called Professor Harry Hochstadt, Chairman of the Mathematics Department. It appears that he had protested the policy as described in the letter from Professor Sibner of 31 Marych 1984, and had just received a somewhat different version from the provost. The statement was that if a granting agency did not forbid it, a proposer in seeking a grant of two months summer salary must also ask for 10% additional to cover release from one course in one semester. However, if the agency does not grant the 10%, the Institute does not intend to use the money for one month in its place to cover a release during one semester. It was the advice of Professor Hochstadt, in which Professor Sibner concurred, that it could be counterproductive to forward the Council resolution at this time. Should it be useful in the near future, its appearance will be requested. E.P] NEW BUSINESS 9.1 DUES: The annual dues of an ordinary member are set by the Council with the approval of the Trustees. The Council performed this duty at the Annual Meeting of 1982 by establishing a formula whereby dues are increased each year a whole dollar amount equivalent to the percentage increase in average salary for institutions reporting data to the AAUP for the last decade. According to this rule, dues for persons with higher academic earnings are as follows: 1982$48
1983	 52
1984	 56

The formula would produce a figure for 1985 of $60. Analysis in the Department of Membership and Sales and elsewhere has shown that dues are not covering member services, so that publication is unduly subsidizing service by an annual amount on the order of$120,000.  Dues of $72 rather than$60 would eliminate this subsidy.

The Secretary proposed that dues at the higher salary level for 1985 be set at
$72, rather than$60 and that dues,thereafter, be continued by the formula
from the base of $72 rather than$60.

Professor Susan Friedlander objected on the grounds that the increase was
sufficient to cause resignations according to a small poll that she had
conducted.  After discussion, Professor Kaplansky proposed that the change
in base be accomplished in two years, with higher level dues being $66 for 1985,$78 for 1986, and being determined by the formula thereafter.  The motion
was passed with the understanding that the change be explained in advance
through an article in the NOTICES.  The division between the higher level of
dues as stated above, and a lower level, was set at \$23,000 for 1985.

A motion was passed that dues for students and unemployed be set at a
convenient figure about one quarter of the higher level of dues.

A motion was passed that the dues for membership by reciprocity be set at a
convenient figure about half of the higher level of dues.  This motion was
advanced by the Secretary and was explained to be contrary to a stated
recommendation from the Agenda and Budget Committee that the fraction be three
fourths.  The argument hinged on the fact that external membership, with dues
slightly larger than reciprocity dues, would become an almost meaningless
concept.

The Council adjourned at 10:50 P.M. April 5, 1984.

EVERETT PITCHER, SECRETARY