Tight closure test ideals have been central to the classification of singularities in rings of characteristic $p>0$, and via reduction to characteristic $p>0$, in equal characteristic 0 as well. Their properties and applications have been described by Schwede and Tucker [Progress in commutative algebra 2, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2012]. In this paper, we extend the notion of a test ideal to arbitrary closure operations, particularly those coming from big Cohen-Macaulay modules and algebras, and prove that it shares key properties of tight closure test ideals. Our main results show how these test ideals can be used to give a characteristic-free classification of singularities, including a few specific results on the mixed characteristic case. We also compute examples of these test ideals.
1. Introduction
The test ideal originated in the study of tight closure Reference HH90. Since then, it has been used to define a classification of singularities in rings of characteristic $p>0$Reference HH90Reference HH94Reference HH89, which aligns well with the classification of singularities in equal characteristic 0 Reference Smi00Reference Har01. The general idea is that the larger the test ideal, the closer the ring is to being regular, and the smaller the test ideal, the singular the ring is. The gap in the literature on test ideals is the mixed characteristic case. Recent work of Ma and Schwede Reference MS18aReference MS18b has begun to fill in this gap, from the perspective of test ideals of pairs. However, most existing results are heavily dependent on the characteristic of the ring, and it is not always known whether corresponding definitions actually agree. In this paper, we study a generalization of the test ideal in a characteristic-free setting. We study test ideals from the perspective of closure operations, mimicking the approach of Hochster and Huneke Reference Hoc07 with regard to the tight closure test ideal but broadening our definition to include test ideals coming from arbitrary closure operations.
We are motivated by work of the second named author on the connections between closure operations given by big Cohen-Macaulay modules and algebras, and the singularities of the ring Reference R.G16bReference RG18, and encouraged by the fact that these connections hold in all characteristics. More precisely, in Reference R.G16b, the second named author proved that a ring is regular if and only if all closure operations satisfying certain axioms (Dietz closures) act trivially on modules over the ring. Since big Cohen-Macaulay modules give Dietz closures, we expect further connections to hold between the singularities of the ring and the big Cohen-Macaulay module closures over the ring, and we give some of those connections in this paper. In order to do this, we define and study the test ideals given by closures coming from big Cohen-Macaulay modules and algebras. See Section 3 for details.
We prove that the test ideal of a module closure has multiple equivalent definitions, which we use to get our main results connecting singularities to big Cohen-Macaulay module test ideals.
In particular, the second result is similar to the result that the tight closure test ideal
for particular elements $c$Reference HT04. This perspective on the tight closure test ideal is one of the major tools used to study it, as described in Reference ST12. Our second definition also coincides with the trace ideal of the module $B$, as studied in Reference Lam99Reference Lin17. By drawing this connection, we open the door for future results on test ideals using the theory of trace ideals, and vice versa. In an upcoming paper with Neil Epstein Reference ERG21, the second named author has generalized this to a duality between closure operations and interior operations on finitely-generated and Artinian modules over complete local rings.
One important consequence of these results is that when the ring is complete and cl is a big Cohen-Macaulay module closure, $\tau _{\operatorname {cl}}(R)$ is nonzero (Corollary 3.16).
We also define a finitistic test ideal of an arbitrary closure operation and discuss cases where it is equal to the (big) test ideal of the same closure operation. In the Gorenstein case, the test ideal of an algebra closure is the whole ring if and only if the corresponding finitistic test ideal is also the whole ring (Proposition 3.10).
One advantage to working with test ideals of module closures is that, as a consequence of Theorem 3.12, when the module is finitely-generated, we can compute its test ideal in Macaulay2. This is in contrast to the tight closure test ideal, which is difficult to compute in general. In Section 5, we compute examples of test ideals of finitely-generated Cohen-Macaulay modules, and in some cases are able to compute or approximate the “smallest” Cohen-Macaulay test ideal.
In summary, our results on the classification of singularities via test ideals are:
We apply our techniques to the case of mixed characteristic rings in Section 6. We propose a mixed characteristic closure operation that satisfies Dietz’s axioms (these guarantee that it acts like a big Cohen-Macaulay module closure–see Reference Die10Reference R.G16b for details), and prove that its test ideal can be viewed in three different ways similar to those we gave for module closures earlier. In addition to demonstrating how our results can be used in mixed characteristic, this section shows how our proof techniques can be applied to a broader group of closures than module closures.
Throughout the paper, $R$ will denote a commutative Noetherian ring, though some of the $R$-algebras under consideration will not be Noetherian.
2. Preliminaries
In this section we recall the concepts of closure operations and trace ideals. We record their basic properties for later use and give the appropriate references for their proofs.
2.1. Closure operations
Given a submodule $N$ of a module $M$, we would like to find a submodule of $M$ containing $N$ that also satisfies some desired properties. This idea is encoded in the following familiar definition.
A particularly important family of closures are Dietz closures, originally defined in Reference Die10Reference Die18. A local domain has a Dietz closure if and only if it has a big Cohen-Macaulay module Reference Die10.
Associated to any $R$-module$B$ we define a closure operation as follows.
When $B$ is an $R$-algebra, the previous definition can be simplified to $u \in N_M^{\operatorname {cl}_B}$ if and only if
$$\begin{equation*} 1\otimes u \in \operatorname {Im}(B\otimes N \to B\otimes M). \end{equation*}$$
The following examples show that familiar ideals and closure operations are particular examples of module closures.
When the closure operation satisfies the functoriality and semi-residuality axioms, the elements of the ring multiplying the closure inside the original module can be seen as an annihilator. More precisely:
Proposition 2.16 gives information about the behavior of module closures under ring extension.
The generation property enables us to compare the closures given by $B$ and $D$. Before we give the precise result we need a lemma.
Proposition 2.20 is the result of a conversation with Yongwei Yao, and gives one case where we have containment of module closures.
Theorem 2.21 characterizes regular rings in terms of the behaviour of Dietz closures. This result describes an important connection between the behavior of big Cohen-Macaulay module closure operations and the singularities of the ring.
Note that this result holds regardless of the characteristic of $R$, as by Reference HH92Reference And18, we know that big Cohen-Macaulay algebras (and in particular big Cohen-Macaulay modules) exist over complete local domains of any characteristic.
In fact, the proof of this statement in Reference R.G16b uses the fact that big Cohen-Macaulay modules over regular rings are faithfully flat Reference HH92, and we get the following corollary to Theorem 2.21 and its proof in Reference R.G16b:
We also have the following:
2.2. Trace ideals and modules
That is, the trace of a module $A$ with respect to another module $B$ is the submodule generated by the images of all possible maps from $B$ to $A$.
We collect some basic properties of the trace in the next proposition.
The result below relates traces of modules in an exact sequence.
3. Test ideals and trace ideals
In this section we define the test ideal of an arbitrary closure operation, give some of its basic properties, and prove that the test ideal of a module closure is a trace ideal.
When cl is tight closure, these definitions agree with the tight closure test ideal as given in Reference HH90, Definition 8.22. As an immediate consequence of Definition 3.1 we get:
Note that if $R$ is Cohen-Macaulay, then $\tau _R(R)=R$, so the converse holds.
It follows from the definition that $\tau _{\operatorname {cl}}(R) \subseteq \tau ^{\text{fg}}_{\operatorname {cl}}(R)$, leading to the following question that is still open in most cases for the tight closure test ideal.
The following result answers this question in one special case. We will be able to say more once we prove Proposition 3.9, our first result giving an alternate definition of the test ideal.
Using this alternative description of the test ideal, we give an additional partial answer to Question 3.7. This result is the module-closure version of Theorem 3.1 of Reference HH89 or the notes of October 22nd and 24th of Reference Hoc07.
We can use the previous result to give a similar result for families.
The following theorem connects test ideals with trace ideals, and is the key component of many of our results. This connects the idea of the test ideal with representation theoretic ideas.
The following results use Theorem 3.12 to extend our knowledge of test ideals and closure operations, and in particular give an important case when the test ideal is nonzero. First we recall a definition:
When $R$ is local and has a canonical module $\omega$,$\omega$ has a free summand if and only if $R$ is Gorenstein, and hence $\operatorname {tr}_\omega (R)$ can be used to detect whether the ring is Gorenstein Reference HHS19, Lemma 2.1. We give a test ideal interpretation of this result.
4. Test ideals of families
We extend the concept of test ideal introduced in the previous setting to that of families of modules. We can make this definition even when the family of modules does not give an idempotent closure operation, which is one way to deal with the question of how large the sum of the corresponding module closure operations can be (discussed in Reference R.G16b, Section 9.2). We will then discuss the test ideals of specific families of big Cohen-Macaulay modules and algebras and connect them to the singularities of the ring.
We list an immediate set of properties.
Note that if $\mathcal{B}$ is a directed family of $R$-algebras or of $R$-modules directed under generation, so that it defines a closure operation, then this definition of the test ideal agrees with our prior definition:
Ideally, we want to consider the test ideal coming from the family of all Cohen-Macaulay modules, since a ring is regular if and only if the test ideals of these modules are equal to the whole ring by Corollary 3.5. The collection of Cohen-Macaulay modules is not generally a set, so we work with the following family instead:
The following results connect the test ideals of big Cohen-Macaulay modules to the singular locus of the ring, and are used to get more specific results on test ideals of big Cohen-Macaulay modules over rings with finite Cohen-Macaulay type.
This leads to a statement for test ideals.
If $R$ is a local ring of finite Cohen-Macaulay type, we know the following:
If $R$ is not regular then the top dimensional syzygy $S$ of the residue field $k$ is a finitely-generated Cohen-Macaulay module for $R$ with no free summand Reference Dut89, Corollary 1.2. Hence by Proposition 2.27 part (6), $\operatorname {tr}_S(R) \neq R$ and by Corollary 3.18, $\tau _S(R) \ne R$.
The following results connect the trace ideal, and hence the test ideal, to the socle of the ring (the set of elements annihilated by the maximal ideal $m$). Rings with nonzero socle are not reduced.
As a consequence of these results, when $R$ is zero-dimensional, we can say exactly what the singular test ideal is.
In the one-dimensional case, we prove that $\tau _{MCM}(R)=\operatorname {tr}_{MCM}(R) \ne 0$ under the hypothesis that $R$ is analytically unramified (i.e., its completion is reduced). We use several definitions from Reference LW12, Chapter 4.
If $M$ is a finitely-generated Cohen-Macaulay $R$-module, then $M$ is torsion-free. We use $\bar{R}M$ to denote the $\bar{R}$-submodule of $K \otimes _R M$ generated by $\operatorname {Im}(M \to K \otimes _R M)$. This module is $\bar{R}$-projectiveReference LW12, Chapter 4.
We now discuss the test ideal given by the family of big Cohen-Macaulay $R$-algebras. The following result of Hochster indicates that tight closure on finitely-generated $R$-modules comes from big Cohen-Macaulay $R$-algebras. Our study of the test ideal coming from the family of big Cohen-Macaulay algebras is motivated by the view that big Cohen-Macaulay algebras are a useful tight closure replacement in all characteristics.
The following result indicates why big Cohen-Macaulay algebra test ideals are a good tight closure replacement.
This result only concerns the finitistic test ideal because it is unknown whether tight closure and big Cohen-Macaulay algebras give the same closure operation on all $R$-modules, or even the same big test ideal. We are still able to get the following consequence:
If $R$ is a complete local domain of equal characteristic, Dietz and R.G. Reference Die07Reference DR17 construct a directed family of big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, i.e., a family of big Cohen-Macaulay $R$-algebras such that given big Cohen-Macaulay algebras $B$ and $B'$, there is a big Cohen-Macaulay algebra $C$ and $R$-algebra maps $B,B' \to C$ that give rise to the following commutative diagram, where the maps $R \to B$ and $R \to B'$ send $1 \mapsto 1$:
$$\begin{equation*} \begin{CD} B @>>> C \\@AAA @AAA \\R @>>> B' \\\end{CD} \end{equation*}$$
In characteristic $p>0$, this includes all big Cohen-Macaulay $R$-algebras; in equal characteristic 0, this includes all big Cohen-Macaulay $R$-algebras that are ultrarings. In these cases, we use the closure operation given by the family of big Cohen-Macaulay $R$-algebras to define the test ideal.
For our purposes, we will be dealing with rings of equal characteristic 0 that are ultraproducts of rings of characteristic $p>0$, as in Reference DR17.
In either case, we can define the test ideal of the directed family as in Definition 4.1.
5. Examples
In this section we compute test ideals and trace ideals. In these examples, we compute $\operatorname {Hom}_R(B,R)$ for various Cohen-Macaulay modules $B$, and look at the images of these maps in $R$. In the situation of Theorem 3.12, this gives us the test ideal $\tau _B(R)$, and in general it gives us the trace ideal $\operatorname {tr}_B(R)$.
But this is not always true in the general one-dimensional case, as Example 5.2 shows.
The following example is of a ring with countable Cohen-Macaulay type whose singular test ideal is not primary to the maximal ideal. This indicates that Proposition 4.14 does not hold even for fairly nice rings with infinite Cohen-Macaulay type.
Even though we have only defined test ideals for domains, we can compute trace ideals without this hypothesis. In the next example we compute the trace ideal of a non-domain ring with respect to its finitely-generated Cohen-Macaulay modules.
One more example of modules for which we can say something is the following
6. Mixed characteristic
Recently, André proved the existence of big Cohen-Macaulay algebras in mixed characteristic Reference And18. We take advantage of this result and of almost big Cohen-Macaulay algebras as defined by Roberts Reference Rob10 and used by André to define a closure operation in mixed characteristic, and to prove that the corresponding test ideal can be written as a variant on a trace ideal, paralleling our results in previous sections. This demonstrates that the arguments used in earlier sections can be adapted to apply to closures that are variations on module closures.
Our closure is similar to dagger closure as defined by Hochster and Huneke Reference HH91. The key difference is that we have replaced $R^+$, the absolute integral closure of $R$, with an arbitrary almost big Cohen-Macaulay algebra. We are also using small powers of a particular element as our “test elements”, as is usual in working with perfectoid algebras, rather than using arbitrary elements of small order as in Reference HH91.
In this section, let $(R,m)$ be a complete local domain of dimension $d>0$ and mixed characteristic $(0,p)$,$T$ a $p$-torsion free algebra, and $\pi \in T$ a non-zero divisor such that $T$ contains a compatible system of $p$-power roots of $\pi$, i.e. a set of elements $\{\pi ^{1/{p^n}}\}_{n \ge 1}$ such that $(\pi ^{1/{p^n}})^{p^m}=\pi ^{1/{p^{n-m}}}$ for all $m \le n$. We will denote this system of $p$-power roots of $\pi$ by $\pi ^{1/{p^\infty }}$.
André proved the existence of almost big Cohen-Macaulay algebras as a step on the way to proving the existence of big Cohen-Macaulay algebras. The reason we have included this “intermediate” step in our paper (rather than focusing solely on big Cohen-Macaulay algebras) is that almost mathematics is central to major results in mixed characteristic commutative algebra, and our techniques can be applied to this case. This also connects our results to the recent work of Reference MS18a on a mixed characteristic version of a test ideal for pairs in regular rings, which is defined using an almost big Cohen-Macaulay algebra.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Neil Epstein, Haydee Lindo, Keith Pardue, Karl Schwede, Kevin Tucker, Janet Vassilev, and Yongwei Yao for helpful conversations that improved this paper tremendously. In particular, Janet Vassilev shared information on interior operations, Karl Schwede suggested working on the mixed characteristic case, Kevin Tucker suggested Remark 3.14, Haydee Lindo taught the authors about trace ideals, Neil Epstein listened to some of the main proofs, Keith Pardue gave advice on Remark 4.6 and Yongwei Yao discussed the proof of Proposition 2.20 with the second named author. The anonymous referee also made suggestions that improved the exposition of the paper.
Yves André, La conjecture du facteur direct(French, with French summary), Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 127 (2018), 71–93, DOI 10.1007/s10240-017-0097-9. MR3814651, Show rawAMSref\bib{andre}{article}{
label={And18},
author={Andr\'{e}, Yves},
title={La conjecture du facteur direct},
language={French, with French summary},
journal={Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'{E}tudes Sci.},
volume={127},
date={2018},
pages={71--93},
issn={0073-8301},
review={\MR {3814651}},
doi={10.1007/s10240-017-0097-9},
}
Reference [CR90]
Charles W. Curtis and Irving Reiner, Methods of representation theory. Vol. I, Wiley Classics Library, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1990. With applications to finite groups and orders; Reprint of the 1981 original; A Wiley-Interscience Publication. MR1038525, Show rawAMSref\bib{curtisreiner}{book}{
label={CR90},
author={Curtis, Charles W.},
author={Reiner, Irving},
title={Methods of representation theory. Vol. I},
series={Wiley Classics Library},
note={With applications to finite groups and orders; Reprint of the 1981 original; A Wiley-Interscience Publication},
publisher={John Wiley \& Sons, Inc., New York},
date={1990},
pages={xxiv+819},
isbn={0-471-52367-4},
review={\MR {1038525}},
}
Reference [Die07]
Geoffrey D. Dietz, Big Cohen-Macaulay algebras and seeds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007), no. 12, 5959–5989, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9947-07-04252-3. MR2336312, Show rawAMSref\bib{dietzseeds}{article}{
label={Die07},
author={Dietz, Geoffrey D.},
title={Big Cohen-Macaulay algebras and seeds},
journal={Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={359},
date={2007},
number={12},
pages={5959--5989},
issn={0002-9947},
review={\MR {2336312}},
doi={10.1090/S0002-9947-07-04252-3},
}
Reference [Die10]
Geoffrey D. Dietz, A characterization of closure operations that induce big Cohen-Macaulay modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), no. 11, 3849–3862, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-2010-10417-3. MR2679608, Show rawAMSref\bib{DietzGeoffreyD_A_characterization_of_closure_operations_that_induce_BCM_modules}{article}{
label={Die10},
author={Dietz, Geoffrey D.},
title={A characterization of closure operations that induce big Cohen-Macaulay modules},
journal={Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={138},
date={2010},
number={11},
pages={3849--3862},
issn={0002-9939},
review={\MR {2679608}},
doi={10.1090/S0002-9939-2010-10417-3},
}
Reference [Die18]
Geoffrey D. Dietz, Axiomatic closure operations, phantom extensions, and solidity, J. Algebra 502 (2018), 123–145, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2018.01.023. MR3774887, Show rawAMSref\bib{dietzbigaxioms}{article}{
label={Die18},
author={Dietz, Geoffrey D.},
title={Axiomatic closure operations, phantom extensions, and solidity},
journal={J. Algebra},
volume={502},
date={2018},
pages={123--145},
issn={0021-8693},
review={\MR {3774887}},
doi={10.1016/j.jalgebra.2018.01.023},
}
Reference [DR17]
Geoffrey D. Dietz and Rebecca R. G., Big Cohen-Macaulay and seed algebras in equal characteristic zero via ultraproducts, J. Commut. Algebra 11 (2019), no. 4, 511–533, DOI 10.1216/jca-2019-11-4-511. MR4039980, Show rawAMSref\bib{dietzrg}{article}{
label={DR17},
author={Dietz, Geoffrey D.},
author={R. G., Rebecca},
title={Big Cohen-Macaulay and seed algebras in equal characteristic zero via ultraproducts},
journal={J. Commut. Algebra},
volume={11},
date={2019},
number={4},
pages={511--533},
issn={1939-0807},
review={\MR {4039980}},
doi={10.1216/jca-2019-11-4-511},
}
Reference [DS16]
Rankeya Datta and Karen E. Smith, Frobenius and valuation rings, Algebra Number Theory 10 (2016), no. 5, 1057–1090, DOI 10.2140/ant.2016.10.1057. MR3531362, Show rawAMSref\bib{DattaSmithFrobeniusAndValuationRings}{article}{
label={DS16},
author={Datta, Rankeya},
author={Smith, Karen E.},
title={Frobenius and valuation rings},
journal={Algebra Number Theory},
volume={10},
date={2016},
number={5},
pages={1057--1090},
issn={1937-0652},
review={\MR {3531362}},
doi={10.2140/ant.2016.10.1057},
}
Reference [Dut89]
S. P. Dutta, Syzygies and homological conjectures, Commutative algebra (Berkeley, CA, 1987), Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 15, Springer, New York, 1989, pp. 139–156, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-3660-3_7. MR1015516, Show rawAMSref\bib{SyzygiesHomologicalConjecturesDutta}{article}{
label={Dut89},
author={Dutta, S. P.},
title={Syzygies and homological conjectures},
conference={ title={Commutative algebra}, address={Berkeley, CA}, date={1987}, },
book={ series={Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ.}, volume={15}, publisher={Springer, New York}, },
date={1989},
pages={139--156},
review={\MR {1015516}},
doi={10.1007/978-1-4612-3660-3\_7},
}
Reference [Eps12]
Neil Epstein, A guide to closure operations in commutative algebra, Progress in commutative algebra 2, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2012, pp. 1–37. MR2932590, Show rawAMSref\bib{Eps}{article}{
label={Eps12},
author={Epstein, Neil},
title={A guide to closure operations in commutative algebra},
conference={ title={Progress in commutative algebra 2}, },
book={ publisher={Walter de Gruyter, Berlin}, },
date={2012},
pages={1--37},
review={\MR {2932590}},
}
Reference [ERG21]
Neil Epstein and Rebecca R. G., Closure-interior duality over complete local rings, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 51 (2021), no. 3, 823–853, DOI 10.1216/rmj.2021.51.823. MR4302561, Show rawAMSref\bib{epsteinrg}{article}{
author={Epstein, Neil},
author={R. G., Rebecca},
title={Closure-interior duality over complete local rings},
journal={Rocky Mountain J. Math.},
volume={51},
date={2021},
number={3},
pages={823--853},
issn={0035-7596},
review={\MR {4302561}},
doi={10.1216/rmj.2021.51.823},
}
Reference [Har01]
Nobuo Hara, Geometric interpretation of tight closure and test ideals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), no. 5, 1885–1906, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02695-2. MR1813597, Show rawAMSref\bib{HaraGeometricTestIdeal}{article}{
label={Har01},
author={Hara, Nobuo},
title={Geometric interpretation of tight closure and test ideals},
journal={Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={353},
date={2001},
number={5},
pages={1885--1906},
issn={0002-9947},
review={\MR {1813597}},
doi={10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02695-2},
}
Reference [HH89]
Melvin Hochster and Craig Huneke, Tight closure and strong $F$-regularity, Mém. Soc. Math. France (N.S.) 38 (1989), 119–133. Colloque en l’honneur de Pierre Samuel (Orsay, 1987). MR1044348, Show rawAMSref\bib{HoHuStrongFRegularity}{article}{
label={HH89},
author={Hochster, Melvin},
author={Huneke, Craig},
title={Tight closure and strong $F$-regularity},
note={Colloque en l'honneur de Pierre Samuel (Orsay, 1987)},
journal={M\'{e}m. Soc. Math. France (N.S.)},
number={38},
date={1989},
pages={119--133},
issn={0037-9484},
review={\MR {1044348}},
}
Reference [HH90]
Melvin Hochster and Craig Huneke, Tight closure, invariant theory, and the Briançon-Skoda theorem, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), no. 1, 31–116, DOI 10.2307/1990984. MR1017784, Show rawAMSref\bib{HoHu1}{article}{
label={HH90},
author={Hochster, Melvin},
author={Huneke, Craig},
title={Tight closure, invariant theory, and the Brian\c {c}on-Skoda theorem},
journal={J. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={3},
date={1990},
number={1},
pages={31--116},
issn={0894-0347},
review={\MR {1017784}},
doi={10.2307/1990984},
}
Reference [HH91]
Melvin Hochster and Craig Huneke, Tight closure and elements of small order in integral extensions, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 71 (1991), no. 2-3, 233–247, DOI 10.1016/0022-4049(91)90149-V. MR1117636, Show rawAMSref\bib{ElementsSmallOrderIntegralExtensionsHochsterHuneke}{article}{
label={HH91},
author={Hochster, Melvin},
author={Huneke, Craig},
title={Tight closure and elements of small order in integral extensions},
journal={J. Pure Appl. Algebra},
volume={71},
date={1991},
number={2-3},
pages={233--247},
issn={0022-4049},
review={\MR {1117636}},
doi={10.1016/0022-4049(91)90149-V},
}
Reference [HH92]
Melvin Hochster and Craig Huneke, Infinite integral extensions and big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, Ann. of Math. (2) 135 (1992), no. 1, 53–89, DOI 10.2307/2946563. MR1147957, Show rawAMSref\bib{HochsterHunekeInfiniteIntegralExtensions}{article}{
label={HH92},
author={Hochster, Melvin},
author={Huneke, Craig},
title={Infinite integral extensions and big Cohen-Macaulay algebras},
journal={Ann. of Math. (2)},
volume={135},
date={1992},
number={1},
pages={53--89},
issn={0003-486X},
review={\MR {1147957}},
doi={10.2307/2946563},
}
Reference [HH94]
Melvin Hochster and Craig Huneke, $F$-regularity, test elements, and smooth base change, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 346 (1994), no. 1, 1–62, DOI 10.2307/2154942. MR1273534, Show rawAMSref\bib{HoHu2}{article}{
label={HH94},
author={Hochster, Melvin},
author={Huneke, Craig},
title={$F$-regularity, test elements, and smooth base change},
journal={Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={346},
date={1994},
number={1},
pages={1--62},
issn={0002-9947},
review={\MR {1273534}},
doi={10.2307/2154942},
}
Reference [HHS19]
Jürgen Herzog, Takayuki Hibi, and Dumitru I. Stamate, The trace of the canonical module, Israel J. Math. 233 (2019), no. 1, 133–165, DOI 10.1007/s11856-019-1898-y. MR4013970, Show rawAMSref\bib{herzoghibistamate}{article}{
label={HHS19},
author={Herzog, J\"{u}rgen},
author={Hibi, Takayuki},
author={Stamate, Dumitru I.},
title={The trace of the canonical module},
journal={Israel J. Math.},
volume={233},
date={2019},
number={1},
pages={133--165},
issn={0021-2172},
review={\MR {4013970}},
doi={10.1007/s11856-019-1898-y},
}
Reference [HLR19]
Melvin Hochster, Graham Leuschke, and Rebecca R. G., Big Cohen-Macaulay modules that split off small Cohen-Macaulay modules, Work in progress, 2019.
Reference [Hoc75]
Melvin Hochster, Topics in the homological theory of modules over commutative rings, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, No. 24, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1975. Expository lectures from the CBMS Regional Conference held at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb., June 24–28, 1974. MR0371879, Show rawAMSref\bib{hochster1975cbms}{book}{
label={Hoc75},
author={Hochster, Melvin},
title={Topics in the homological theory of modules over commutative rings},
series={Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, No. 24},
note={Expository lectures from the CBMS Regional Conference held at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb., June 24--28, 1974},
publisher={Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.},
date={1975},
pages={vii+75},
review={\MR {0371879}},
}
Nobuo Hara and Shunsuke Takagi, On a generalization of test ideals, Nagoya Math. J. 175 (2004), 59–74, DOI 10.1017/S0027763000008904. MR2085311, Show rawAMSref\bib{HaraTakagi}{article}{
label={HT04},
author={Hara, Nobuo},
author={Takagi, Shunsuke},
title={On a generalization of test ideals},
journal={Nagoya Math. J.},
volume={175},
date={2004},
pages={59--74},
issn={0027-7630},
review={\MR {2085311}},
doi={10.1017/S0027763000008904},
}
Reference [Lam99]
T. Y. Lam, Lectures on modules and rings, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 189, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0525-8. MR1653294, Show rawAMSref\bib{Lam}{book}{
label={Lam99},
author={Lam, T. Y.},
title={Lectures on modules and rings},
series={Graduate Texts in Mathematics},
volume={189},
publisher={Springer-Verlag, New York},
date={1999},
pages={xxiv+557},
isbn={0-387-98428-3},
review={\MR {1653294}},
doi={10.1007/978-1-4612-0525-8},
}
Reference [Lin17]
Haydee Lindo, Trace ideals and centers of endomorphism rings of modules over commutative rings, J. Algebra 482 (2017), 102–130, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.10.026. MR3646286, Show rawAMSref\bib{LindoHaydeeTraceIdealsAndCentersOfEndomorphismRingsOfModulesOverCommutativeRings}{article}{
label={Lin17},
author={Lindo, Haydee},
title={Trace ideals and centers of endomorphism rings of modules over commutative rings},
journal={J. Algebra},
volume={482},
date={2017},
pages={102--130},
issn={0021-8693},
review={\MR {3646286}},
doi={10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.10.026},
}
Reference [LW12]
Graham J. Leuschke and Roger Wiegand, Cohen-Macaulay representations, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 181, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012, DOI 10.1090/surv/181. MR2919145, Show rawAMSref\bib{LeuschkeWiegandCohenMacaulayRepresentations}{book}{
label={LW12},
author={Leuschke, Graham J.},
author={Wiegand, Roger},
title={Cohen-Macaulay representations},
series={Mathematical Surveys and Monographs},
volume={181},
publisher={American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI},
date={2012},
pages={xviii+367},
isbn={978-0-8218-7581-0},
review={\MR {2919145}},
doi={10.1090/surv/181},
}
Reference [MS18a]
Linquan Ma and Karl Schwede, Perfectoid multiplier/test ideals in regular rings and bounds on symbolic powers, Invent. Math. 214 (2018), no. 2, 913–955, DOI 10.1007/s00222-018-0813-1. MR3867632, Show rawAMSref\bib{maschwede}{article}{
label={MS18a},
author={Ma, Linquan},
author={Schwede, Karl},
title={Perfectoid multiplier/test ideals in regular rings and bounds on symbolic powers},
journal={Invent. Math.},
volume={214},
date={2018},
number={2},
pages={913--955},
issn={0020-9910},
review={\MR {3867632}},
doi={10.1007/s00222-018-0813-1},
}
Reference [MS18b]
Linquan Ma and Karl Schwede, Singularities in mixed characteristic via perfectoid big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, Preprint, arXiv:1806.09567 [math.AC], 2018.
Reference [RG16a]
Rebecca Rebhuhn-Glanz, Closure Operations that Induce Big Cohen-Macaulay Modules and Algebras, and Classification of Singularities, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2016. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of Michigan. MR3641119, Show rawAMSref\bib{RGthesis}{book}{
label={RG16a},
author={Rebhuhn-Glanz, Rebecca},
title={Closure Operations that Induce Big Cohen-Macaulay Modules and Algebras, and Classification of Singularities},
note={Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan},
publisher={ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI},
date={2016},
pages={100},
isbn={978-1369-58969-6},
review={\MR {3641119}},
}
Reference [R.G16b]
Rebecca R. G., Closure operations that induce big Cohen-Macaulay modules and classification of singularities, J. Algebra 467 (2016), 237–267, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.08.009. MR3545960, Show rawAMSref\bib{RGRebecca_Closures_Big_CM_modules_and_singularities}{article}{
label={R.G16b},
author={R.~G., Rebecca},
title={Closure operations that induce big Cohen-Macaulay modules and classification of singularities},
journal={J. Algebra},
volume={467},
date={2016},
pages={237--267},
issn={0021-8693},
review={\MR {3545960}},
doi={10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.08.009},
}
Reference [RG18]
Rebecca R. G., Closure operations that induce big Cohen-Macaulay algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 222 (2018), no. 7, 1878–1897, DOI 10.1016/j.jpaa.2017.08.011. MR3763288, Show rawAMSref\bib{bigcmalgebraaxiom}{article}{
label={RG18},
author={R. G., Rebecca},
title={Closure operations that induce big Cohen-Macaulay algebras},
journal={J. Pure Appl. Algebra},
volume={222},
date={2018},
number={7},
pages={1878--1897},
issn={0022-4049},
review={\MR {3763288}},
doi={10.1016/j.jpaa.2017.08.011},
}
Reference [Rob10]
Paul C. Roberts, Fontaine rings and local cohomology, J. Algebra 323 (2010), no. 8, 2257–2269, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2010.01.024. MR2596378, Show rawAMSref\bib{robertsalmostcm}{article}{
label={Rob10},
author={Roberts, Paul C.},
title={Fontaine rings and local cohomology},
journal={J. Algebra},
volume={323},
date={2010},
number={8},
pages={2257--2269},
issn={0021-8693},
review={\MR {2596378}},
doi={10.1016/j.jalgebra.2010.01.024},
}
Reference [Sha81]
R. Y. Sharp, Cohen-Macaulay properties for balanced big Cohen-Macaulay modules, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 90 (1981), no. 2, 229–238, DOI 10.1017/S0305004100058680. MR620732, Show rawAMSref\bib{sharpcmprops}{article}{
label={Sha81},
author={Sharp, R. Y.},
title={Cohen-Macaulay properties for balanced big Cohen-Macaulay modules},
journal={Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.},
volume={90},
date={1981},
number={2},
pages={229--238},
issn={0305-0041},
review={\MR {620732}},
doi={10.1017/S0305004100058680},
}
Reference [Smi94]
K. E. Smith, Tight closure of parameter ideals, Invent. Math. 115 (1994), no. 1, 41–60, DOI 10.1007/BF01231753. MR1248078, Show rawAMSref\bib{SmithParameter}{article}{
label={Smi94},
author={Smith, K. E.},
title={Tight closure of parameter ideals},
journal={Invent. Math.},
volume={115},
date={1994},
number={1},
pages={41--60},
issn={0020-9910},
review={\MR {1248078}},
doi={10.1007/BF01231753},
}
Reference [Smi00]
Karen E. Smith, The multiplier ideal is a universal test ideal, Comm. Algebra 28 (2000), no. 12, 5915–5929, DOI 10.1080/00927870008827196. Special issue in honor of Robin Hartshorne. MR1808611, Show rawAMSref\bib{SmithMultiplierTestIdeal}{article}{
label={Smi00},
author={Smith, Karen E.},
title={The multiplier ideal is a universal test ideal},
note={Special issue in honor of Robin Hartshorne},
journal={Comm. Algebra},
volume={28},
date={2000},
number={12},
pages={5915--5929},
issn={0092-7872},
review={\MR {1808611}},
doi={10.1080/00927870008827196},
}
Reference [ST12]
Karl Schwede and Kevin Tucker, A survey of test ideals, Progress in commutative algebra 2, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2012, pp. 39–99. MR2932591, Show rawAMSref\bib{SurveyTestIdeals}{article}{
label={ST12},
author={Schwede, Karl},
author={Tucker, Kevin},
title={A survey of test ideals},
conference={ title={Progress in commutative algebra 2}, },
book={ publisher={Walter de Gruyter, Berlin}, },
date={2012},
pages={39--99},
review={\MR {2932591}},
}
Reference [Yos90]
Yuji Yoshino, Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 146, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511600685. MR1079937, Show rawAMSref\bib{CohenMacaulayModulesOverCohenMacauayRingsYoshino}{book}{
label={Yos90},
author={Yoshino, Yuji},
title={Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings},
series={London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series},
volume={146},
publisher={Cambridge University Press, Cambridge},
date={1990},
pages={viii+177},
isbn={0-521-35694-6},
review={\MR {1079937}},
doi={10.1017/CBO9780511600685},
}
Note. To explore an equation, focus it (e.g., by clicking on it) and use the arrow keys to navigate its structure. Screenreader users should be advised that enabling speech synthesis will lead to duplicate aural rendering.