Classification of discrete series by minimal $K$-type
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Rajagopalan Parthasarathy
- Represent. Theory 19 (2015), 167-185
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/ert/467
- Published electronically: October 7, 2015
- PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
Following the proof by Hecht and Schmid of Blattner’s conjecture for $K$ multiplicities of representations belonging to the discrete series it turned out that some results which were earlier known with some hypothesis on the Harish-Chandra parameter of the discrete series representation could be extended removing those hypotheses. For example this was so for the geometric realization problem. Occasionally a few other results followed by first proving them for Harish-Chandra parameters which are sufficiently regular and then using Zuckerman translation functors, wall crossing methods, etc. Recently, Hongyu He raised the question (private communication) of whether the characterization of a discrete series representation by its lowest $K$-type, which was proved by this author and R. Hotta with some hypothesis on the Harish-Chandra parameter of the discrete series representations, can be extended to all discrete series representations excluding none, using a combination of these powerful techniques. In this article we will answer this question using Dirac operator methods and a result of Susana Salamanca-Riba.References
- R. Hotta and R. Parthasarathy, Multiplicity formulae for discrete series, Invent. Math. 26 (1974), 133–178. MR 348041, DOI 10.1007/BF01435692
- Jing-Song Huang and Pavle Pandžić, Dirac cohomology, unitary representations and a proof of a conjecture of Vogan, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), no. 1, 185–202. MR 1862801, DOI 10.1090/S0894-0347-01-00383-6
- Jing-Song Huang and Pavle Pandžić, Dirac operators in representation theory, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2006. MR 2244116
- Bertram Kostant, Lie algebra cohomology and the generalized Borel-Weil theorem, Ann. of Math. (2) 74 (1961), 329–387. MR 142696, DOI 10.2307/1970237
- Harish-Chandra, On the theory of the Eisenstein integral, Conference on Harmonic Analysis (Univ. Maryland, College Park, Md., 1971), Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 266, Springer, Berlin, 1972, pp. 123–149. MR 0399355
- Harish-Chandra, Harmonic analysis on real reductive groups. I. The theory of the constant term, J. Functional Analysis 19 (1975), 104–204. MR 0399356, DOI 10.1016/0022-1236(75)90034-8
- K. R. Parthasarathy, R. Ranga Rao, and V. S. Varadarajan, Representations of complex semi-simple Lie groups and Lie algebras, Ann. of Math. (2) 85 (1967), 383–429. MR 225936, DOI 10.2307/1970351
- R. Parthasarathy, Dirac operator and the discrete series, Ann. of Math. (2) 96 (1972), 1–30. MR 318398, DOI 10.2307/1970892
- R. Parthasarathy, Criteria for the unitarizability of some highest weight modules, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A Math. Sci. 89 (1980), no. 1, 1–24. MR 573381
- R. Parthasarathy, A generalization of the Enright-Varadarajan modules, Compositio Math. 36 (1978), no. 1, 53–73. MR 515037
- Susana A. Salamanca-Riba, On the unitary dual of real reductive Lie groups and the $A_g(\lambda )$ modules: the strongly regular case, Duke Math. J. 96 (1999), no. 3, 521–546. MR 1671213, DOI 10.1215/S0012-7094-99-09616-3
- Anthony W. Knapp and David A. Vogan Jr., Cohomological induction and unitary representations, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 45, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995. MR 1330919, DOI 10.1515/9781400883936
- Nolan R. Wallach, Real reductive groups. I, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 132, Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. MR 929683
- V. S. Varadarajan, George Mackey and his work on representation theory and foundations of physics, Group representations, ergodic theory, and mathematical physics: a tribute to George W. Mackey, Contemp. Math., vol. 449, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008, pp. 417–446. MR 2391814, DOI 10.1090/conm/449/08722
- V. S. Varadarajan, Some mathematical reminiscences, Methods Appl. Anal. 9 (2002), no. 3, v–xviii. Special issue dedicated to Daniel W. Stroock and Srinivasa S. R. Varadhan on the occasion of their 60th birthday. MR 2023128, DOI 10.4310/MAA.2002.v9.n3.a2
- Apoorva Khare, Representations of complex semi-simple Lie groups and Lie algebras, Connected at infinity. II, Texts Read. Math., vol. 67, Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2013, pp. 85–129. MR 3135123
- A. W. Knapp and E. M. Stein, Intertwining operators for semisimple groups. II, Invent. Math. 60 (1980), no. 1, 9–84. MR 582703, DOI 10.1007/BF01389898
- David A. Vogan Jr. and Gregg J. Zuckerman, Unitary representations with nonzero cohomology, Compositio Math. 53 (1984), no. 1, 51–90. MR 762307
- David A. Vogan Jr., Unitarizability of certain series of representations, Ann. of Math. (2) 120 (1984), no. 1, 141–187. MR 750719, DOI 10.2307/2007074
- S. Kumaresan, On the canonical $k$-types in the irreducible unitary $g$-modules with nonzero relative cohomology, Invent. Math. 59 (1980), no. 1, 1–11. MR 575078, DOI 10.1007/BF01390311
- Wilfried Schmid, On a conjecture of Langlands, Ann. of Math. (2) 93 (1971), 1–42. MR 286942, DOI 10.2307/1970751
- Wilfried Schmid, Discrete series, Representation theory and automorphic forms (Edinburgh, 1996) Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 61, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 83–113. MR 1476494, DOI 10.1090/pspum/061/1476494
- Henryk Hecht and Wilfried Schmid, A proof of Blattner’s conjecture, Invent. Math. 31 (1975), no. 2, 129–154. MR 396855, DOI 10.1007/BF01404112
Bibliographic Information
- Rajagopalan Parthasarathy
- Affiliation: Raja Ramanna Fellow Bharathiar University Coimbatore
- Email: sarathy.math.tifr@gmail.com
- Received by editor(s): July 29, 2014
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: December 4, 2014, and August 14, 2015
- Published electronically: October 7, 2015
- Additional Notes: This research was supported by Raja Ramanna Fellowship from DAE
The author thanks the referee for suggestions to improve the article by addressing the case of general groups of Harish-Chandra class. His comments on the initial proof of Theorem 1.1 in Section 3 have greatly helped in adding considerable clarity to the original submission. - © Copyright 2015 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Represent. Theory 19 (2015), 167-185
- MSC (2010): Primary 22E46; Secondary 22D30
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/ert/467
- MathSciNet review: 3405535