Optimal explicit strong stability preserving Runge–Kutta methods with high linear order and optimal nonlinear order
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Sigal Gottlieb, Zachary Grant and Daniel Higgs;
- Math. Comp. 84 (2015), 2743-2761
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/2966
- Published electronically: April 10, 2015
- PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
High order spatial discretizations with monotonicity properties are often desirable for the solution of hyperbolic PDEs. These methods can advantageously be coupled with high order strong stability preserving time discretizations. The search for high order strong stability time-stepping methods with large allowable strong stability coefficient has been an active area of research over the last two decades. This research has shown that explicit SSP Runge–Kutta methods exist only up to fourth order. However, if we restrict ourselves to solving only linear autonomous problems, the order conditions simplify and this order barrier is lifted: explicit SSP Runge–Kutta methods of any linear order exist. These methods reduce to second order when applied to nonlinear problems. In the current work we aim to find explicit SSP Runge–Kutta methods with large allowable time-step, that feature high linear order and simultaneously have the optimal fourth order nonlinear order. These methods have strong stability coefficients that approach those of the linear methods as the number of stages and the linear order is increased. This work shows that when a high linear order method is desired, it may still be worthwhile to use methods with higher nonlinear order.References
- Sigal Gottlieb and Lee-Ad J. Gottlieb, Strong stability preserving properties of Runge-Kutta time discretization methods for linear constant coefficient operators, J. Sci. Comput. 18 (2003), no. 1, 83–109. MR 1958936, DOI 10.1023/A:1020338228736
- S. Gottlieb, D. I. Ketcheson, and C.-W. Shu, Strong Stability Preserving Runge–Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations, World Scientific Press, 2011.
- Sigal Gottlieb and Chi-Wang Shu, Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes, Math. Comp. 67 (1998), no. 221, 73–85. MR 1443118, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00913-2
- Jan S. Hesthaven, Sigal Gottlieb, and David Gottlieb, Spectral methods for time-dependent problems, Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics, vol. 21, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. MR 2333926, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511618352
- David I. Ketcheson, Highly efficient strong stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods with low-storage implementations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30 (2008), no. 4, 2113–2136. MR 2407154, DOI 10.1137/07070485X
- David I. Ketcheson, Computation of optimal monotonicity preserving general linear methods, Math. Comp. 78 (2009), no. 267, 1497–1513. MR 2501060, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-09-02209-1
- D. I. Ketcheson, Runge-Kutta methods with minimum storage implementations, Journal of Computational Physics, 229 (2010), pp. 1763–1773.
- David I. Ketcheson, Sigal Gottlieb, and Colin B. Macdonald, Strong stability preserving two-step Runge-Kutta methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011), no. 6, 2618–2639. MR 2873250, DOI 10.1137/10080960X
- David I. Ketcheson, Colin B. Macdonald, and Sigal Gottlieb, Optimal implicit strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta methods, Appl. Numer. Math. 59 (2009), no. 2, 373–392. MR 2484928, DOI 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.03.034
- D. I. Ketcheson, M. Parsani, and A. J. Ahmadia, Rk-opt: Software for the design of runge–kutta meththods, version 0.2. https://github.com/ketch/RK-opt.
- J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger, Absolute monotonicity of polynomials occurring in the numerical solution of initial value problems, Numer. Math. 48 (1986), no. 3, 303–322. MR 826471, DOI 10.1007/BF01389477
- J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger, Contractivity of Runge–Kutta methods, BIT, 31 (1991), pp. 482–528.
- Steven J. Ruuth and Raymond J. Spiteri, Two barriers on strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Spectral and High Order Methods (ICOSAHOM-01) (Uppsala), 2002, pp. 211–220. MR 1910562, DOI 10.1023/A:1015156832269
- Chi-Wang Shu, Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 9 (1988), no. 6, 1073–1084. MR 963855, DOI 10.1137/0909073
- Chi-Wang Shu and Stanley Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77 (1988), no. 2, 439–471. MR 954915, DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5
- M. N. Spijker, Stepsize conditions for general monotonicity in numerical initial value problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2007), no. 3, 1226–1245. MR 2318810, DOI 10.1137/060661739
- Raymond J. Spiteri and Steven J. Ruuth, A new class of optimal high-order strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2002), no. 2, 469–491. MR 1921666, DOI 10.1137/S0036142901389025
Bibliographic Information
- Sigal Gottlieb
- Affiliation: Mathematics Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747
- MR Author ID: 358958
- Email: sgottlieb@umassd.edu
- Zachary Grant
- Affiliation: Mathematics Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747
- Email: email:zgrant@umassd.edu
- Daniel Higgs
- Affiliation: Mathematics Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747
- MR Author ID: 906696
- Email: danielhiggs@gmail.com
- Received by editor(s): March 14, 2014
- Published electronically: April 10, 2015
- © Copyright 2015 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Math. Comp. 84 (2015), 2743-2761
- MSC (2010): Primary 65-XX
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/2966
- MathSciNet review: 3378846