Skip to Main Content

Mathematics of Computation

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1960 (published as Mathematical Tables and other Aids to Computation 1943-1959), Mathematics of Computation is devoted to research articles of the highest quality in computational mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6842 (online) ISSN 0025-5718 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Mathematics of Computation is 1.78.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

A globally convergent primal-dual interior-point relaxation method for nonlinear programs
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Xin-Wei Liu and Yu-Hong Dai HTML | PDF
Math. Comp. 89 (2020), 1301-1329 Request permission

Abstract:

We prove that the classic logarithmic barrier problem is equivalent to a particular logarithmic barrier positive relaxation problem with barrier and scaling parameters. Based on the equivalence, a line-search primal-dual interior-point relaxation method for nonlinear programs is presented. Our method does not require any primal or dual iterates to be interior-points, which has similarity to some warmstarting interior-point methods and is different from most of the globally convergent interior-point methods in the literature. A new logarithmic barrier penalty function dependent on both primal and dual variables is used to prompt the global convergence of the method, where the penalty parameter is adaptively updated. Without assuming any regularity condition, it is proved that our method will either terminate at an approximate KKT point of the original problem, an approximate infeasible stationary point, or an approximate singular stationary point of the original problem. Some preliminary numerical results are reported, including the results for a well-posed problem for which many line-search interior-point methods were demonstrated not to be globally convergent, a feasible problem for which the LICQ and the MFCQ fail to hold at the solution and an infeasible problem, and for some standard test problems of the CUTE collection. Correspondingly, for comparison we also report the numerical results obtained by the interior-point solver IPOPT. These results show that our algorithm is not only efficient for well-posed feasible problems, but is also applicable for some feasible problems without LICQ or MFCQ and some infeasible problems.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Mathematics of Computation with MSC (2010): 90C30, 90C51, 90C26
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 90C30, 90C51, 90C26
Additional Information
  • Xin-Wei Liu
  • Affiliation: Institute of Mathematics, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, People’s Republic of China
  • MR Author ID: 667307
  • Email: mathlxw@hebut.edu.cn
  • Yu-Hong Dai
  • Affiliation: Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China; and School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
  • MR Author ID: 620453
  • Email: dyh@lsec.cc.ac.cn
  • Received by editor(s): December 1, 2017
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: August 15, 2018, April 7, 2019, May 29, 2019, and June 20, 2019
  • Published electronically: December 6, 2019
  • Additional Notes: The first author is the corresponding author
    The research was supported in part by the Chinese NSF grants (nos. 11671116 and 11271107), the Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 91630202), and a grant (no. A2015202365) from the Hebei Natural Science Foundation of China
    The second author was supported in part by the Chinese NSF grants (nos. 11631013, 11331012 and 81173633) and the National Key Basic Research Program of China (no. 2015CB856000)
  • © Copyright 2019 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Math. Comp. 89 (2020), 1301-1329
  • MSC (2010): Primary 90C30, 90C51; Secondary 90C26
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3487
  • MathSciNet review: 4063319