PDFLINK |

# Uniformization and the Yamabe Problem

Communicated by *Notices* Associate Editor Chikako Mese

## Introduction

Conformal geometry is the subfield of differential geometry that studies manifolds on which infinitesimal angles are defined, but not lengths; that is, the crossing angle between any two intersecting curves is well-defined, but their lengths are not.

Given a manifold recall that a Riemannian metric , is a (smoothly varying) choice of inner product on each tangent space Now, given any inner product . on a vector space the angle , between two vectors may be defined by

The right-hand side remains unaltered if is replaced by ( Thus, angles are well-defined given only a ray of inner products. For this reason, a conformal manifold is usually defined as a manifold ). equipped with an equivalence class of metrics, where if with , a smooth function. (The mode of expression is conventional: the exponential forces the scaling factor to be positive, while the factor is merely for convenience. Other conventions are also popular.)

One of the numerous reasons for the ubiquity of conformal geometry within differential geometry is that a conformal change—replacing by about the simplest nontrivial transformation that can be performed on a metric while preserving some of its geometric content. That the change is scalar also makes it analytically quite practical to study. Just what is preserved under such a change leads to one large set of questions within the field. Thus, for example, the Weyl tensor, which is the totally tracefree part of the Riemann curvature tensor, transforms according to the simple rule —is We will focus on another set of questions: what can be changed in a useful way? Put differently: given a Riemannian metric . is there a conformal metric , with especially nice properties? (Can it perhaps be used to study This question has been extremely influential in geometric analysis, and we will be concerned with several versions of it. ?)

## Beginnings: Two Dimensions

Conformal geometry in two dimensions is a very different subject from that in higher dimensions, because of its intimate relationship with complex analysis. Every nonsingular holomorphic function between regions of the complex plane is angle-preserving (conformal). Thus, if it is also bijective, it is in fact a conformal equivalence—from the point of view of conformal geometry, two regions connected by such a function are equivalent. The Riemann mapping theorem may thus be viewed as saying that every simply connected proper open subset of the plane is conformally equivalent to the unit disk.

A natural question is whether the same might in some sense be true of a compact Riemann surface Of course, topological considerations forbid the existence of a homeomorphism between . and the disk, but might we at least expect the existence of a smooth function such that has vanishing Gaussian curvature? (This would imply that is at least locally isometric to the disk.) In fact, the answer is certainly no: the Gauss-Bonnet theorem asserts that the Gaussian curvature of any metric satisfies

where is the Euler characterisic of Thus, unless . (i.e., unless is a torus), there can be no such function. However, a significant classical result asserts that we can obtain the best that Gauss-Bonnet allows.

There are many proofs; we mention

One might very well ask what the situation is for a surface with boundary. If has a boundary, Gauss-Bonnet reads

where is the geodesic curvature of the boundary. Thus, in this case, Gauss-Bonnet does *not* forbid obtaining as long as , is nonzero. Sure enough, the uniformization theorem for surfaces with boundary states that a conformal change lets us push the topological data to the boundary, and make it constant there.

See, for example,

## Higher Dimensions: The Yamabe Problem

In higher dimensions, complex analysis no longer plays an important role in conformal geometry, and the methods of proof are often quite different. Indeed, two dimensions is much more “flexible,” since the Liouville theorem shows that the space of conformal maps of for is finite dimensional, in contrast to the two-dimensional case. Yet it is natural to ask very similar questions. One of the most celebrated problems of twentieth-century differential geometry is the Yamabe problem, raised by Hidehiko Yamabe in 1960. This asks whether the uniformization theorem holds for compact manifolds when That is, given a Riemannian manifold . does there exist , such that has constant *scalar* curvature (To look for constant higher-rank curvature would yield a vastly overdetermined problem, since a conformal change is itself a scalar.) Actually, it is more common in this context to write the conformal change as ? requiring , this is merely conventional, and is because the problem becomes easier to express and study when written in terms of ;

Yamabe believed he had proven that the answer is yes, but seven years after his tragically early death in 1960, Neil Trudinger discovered a significant error in his path-breaking paper. Partial solutions to the Yamabe problem were given over the next ten years by Trudinger and by Thierry Aubin, and in 1984, Richard Schoen finally solved all the remaining cases using the positive mass theorem.

Note that in higher dimensions, the Chern-Gauss-Bonnet theorem says nothing about so whether the constant given by this theorem is positive, negative, or zero is a property more of the conformal geometry of , than of the topology (although the two are not unrelated).

The condition (with constant) is equivalent to solving the PDE

2where is the *conformal Laplacian* of (The conformal Laplacian is so named because it satisfies the relatively nice conformal transformation property . Here . is the conformal Laplacian of One thus wishes to find a strictly positive solution to .)2. The original approach to solving the Yamabe problem is variational: 2 is the Euler-Lagrange equation of the functional

It follows easily by Hölder’s inequality that is bounded below, so one can take a minimizing sequence; the challenge is then to show that it converges to a solution to 2, and that said solution is positive. The analytical and geometric ideas that go toward showing that this is the case are ponderous. First, one replaces the exponent in 2 by as the former is the “critical exponent” for which the relevant Sobolev injection fails to be compact. This process of ,*subcritical regularization* yields a compact variational problem. Finding a solution via the direct method in the calculus of variations, the question then becomes whether this converges to a solution as This is addressed by studying the Euler equation associated to . .

Let which one may show is a conformal invariant. It was shown by Trudinger and Aubin that if , does not converge to a solution then we must have , where the latter is the conformal round sphere; so a solution exists if , The problem is thus reduced to showing that the latter inequality holds. This can be done in many cases by constructing clever test functions . that realize the inequality. In the work of Aubin, the test function is constructed using local geometry. Schoen’s approach in solving the remaining cases used global geometry to construct test functions. Indeed, one of his key ideas in completing the proof was to use the Green’s function of itself as a conformal change factor; since it blows up at a point, this transforms the manifold to a noncompact but asymptotically flat space. A careful study of the asymptotics of the Green’s function allows the problem then to be solved by appealing to the positive mass theorem of Schoen-Yau, which arose from General Relativity. The full details, including all the original references, are given in the well-known survey

Once again, there are natural related problems to ask in the case of compact manifolds with boundary. The one we will consider here can be considered a natural analog of the Riemann mapping theorem and of Theorem 2. In higher dimensions, the appropriate boundary curvature to consider is the mean curvature rather than the geodesic curvature. The following theorem was first studied by Pascal Cherrier and was established in most cases by José Escobar in 1992; the remaining cases were treated by Sergio Almaraz, Sophie Chen, Fernando Coda Marques, and Martin Mayer and Cheikh Ndiaye. ,

(Escobar also treated the reverse problem, where is constant and The works of Escobar, Almaraz, Chen, and Marques used the Aubin-Schoen minimization approach. Indeed, numerous new techniques were developed in the proof of these theorems. Escobar developed a highly refined asymptotic expansion of the Green’s function of the conformal Laplacian near the boundary, as well as a positive mass theorem in the bounded setting. Subsequent developments were often based on ever-finer constructions of local or global test functions. The final step, by Mayer and Ndiaye, used the Bari-Coron barycenter technique. Of the many papers we could cite in this line, we mention .)

## Fourth Order

The scalar curvature is not the only scalar function that is important to understanding the curvature of a Riemannian manifold. Since it was introduced by Tom Branson and Bent Ørsted, the so-called has been an object of intense study. This is a local curvature invariant. Define -curvature and the *Schouten tensor* by Then . is defined by thus, it is fourth-order in derivatives of the metric tensor. We will mention here two of its numerous interesting properties. First, let the Paneitz operator be the fourth-order operator defined by ; where , is the adjoint (with respect to of the exterior derivative, and the two-tensor in the second term acts as an endomorphism on one-forms via ) Now, this linear elliptic operator is a pointwise conformal invariant in the sense that, if . then , this is analogous to the conformal change property of the conformal Laplacian. The first interesting property of the ; then, is that under a conformal change, when -curvature, the , transforms by -curvature which is exactly analogous to the relationship between the Gaussian curvature and the Laplacian when , while if ; it transforms by , which is analogous to the relationship (for , between the scalar curvature ) and Here, . much as in ,1. The second interesting property is that, in dimension four, the Chern-Gauss-Bonnet formula can be written in such a way as to include :

where is the Weyl tensor of Now, . is an absolute pointwise conformal invariant, so is a global conformal invariant. Given these properties, it becomes irresistible to see playing a rather exact fourth-order analog to the second-order at least in conformal geometry. ,

The question then arises: can one make a conformal transformation so that is a constant? In the case due to the Chern-Gauss-Bonnet formula and the conformal invariance of total , this has the flavor of the uniformization theorem. In higher dimension, it is the fourth-order analog of the Yamabe problem. The affirmative answer to the fourth-order uniformization question in dimension four was given in two steps in the papers ,

The work

Just as mean curvature is a natural first-order boundary curvature associated to scalar curvature, in four dimensions there is a natural third-order boundary curvature associated to the so-called , defined by Alice Chang and Jie Qing. This curvature has leading part -curvature where , is the inward unit normal field. One can define a linear boundary operator with leading part that is conformally invariant in the sense that and such that it controls the conformal behavior of , according to the formula The curvature . appears in the Chern-Gauss-Bonnet formula with according to the equation

where is a pointwise conformally invariant curvature quantity. A natural fourth-order generalization of the boundary uniformization problem, in four dimensions, is thus to ask whether we can make a conformal change that will set to zero and to a constant. The answer is generically yes, as shown by Ndiaye

The proof uses the min-max method of Djadli-Malchiodi.

Extending the fourth-order problem to higher dimensions than four required significant new techniques. One of the challenges of studying fourth-order elliptic equations, as opposed to second-order ones, is that there is no maximum principle in the case of the former. It was thus a significant achievement when Matthew Gursky and Malchiodi *does* satisfy a maximum principle:

In the same paper, they also proved a fourth-order positive mass theorem for the Green’s function of the Paneitz operator for the global case. Using these remarkable results, they were able to prove a fourth-order Yamabe theorem in higher dimensions.

The proof in

Jeffrey Case introduced boundary curvatures analogous to in dimension higher than the third-order one, he calls ; There is also an associated conformally invariant boundary operator of third order, which we also call . An argument in .

The equation 4 is dual to the problem for the fractional curvature in the Poincaré-Einstein setting. The argument in

## Higher Order

The existence of conformally invariant operators and associated curvatures such as and is not an isolated phenomenon. In 1992, Robin Graham, Ralph Jenne, Lionsel Mason, and George Sparling showed that there exist conformally covariant operators of every order having principal part , Branson defined an associated . curvature so that, in dimension the , transforms by -curvature

(with a somewhat more complicated transformation formula in higher dimensions). Branson’s original construction was by analytic continuation in the dimension. The GJMS operators, meanwhile, were defined via the so-called ambient-metric construction of Charles Fefferman and Graham. This allows the study of a conformal manifold by situating it in a Lorentzian manifold of two dimensions higher, much as the sphere could be studied by situating it in the light cone in Minkowski space of two higher dimensions. Relationships between the two were illuminated when Graham and Maciej Zworski showed that each could be defined in terms of the scattering operator on an asymptotically hyperbolic (formally) Einstein space whose boundary was the given manifold.

The higher-order uniformization problem for (sometimes called the *critical case*), where has been solved by Ndiaye ,

As for the lower-order curvatures, in the critical dimension there is again a Chern-Gauss-Bonnet formula, due to Spyros Alexakis, connecting the total and the topology. -curvature

The higher-order Yamabe problem (sometimes called the noncritical case), where was solved quite recently by Saikat Mazumdar and Jérôme Vétois in the setting where the local test function argument works, or if the positive mass theorem holds, using the Aubin-Schoen minimization technique. For example, we mention the following: ,

The mass of the Green’s function mentioned here is the constant term in the asymptotic expansion (in especially nice coordinates) of the Green’s function; it is so named because of its relationship, in the case, with the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner mass of general relativity. One expects that the Bahri-Coron argument should work to yield the remaining cases of this theorem, still assuming the Green’s function is positive.

## Conclusion

The Yamabe problem and its generalizations have been among the driving forces of conformal geometry in the past sixty years. A natural class of problems, they have required the development of new and powerful insights both analytic and geometric for their solution, as well as novel algebraic-topological arguments. Nor are they of interest merely as curiosities: as the ever-growing number of theorems whose hypotheses include some assumption on the Yamabe constant show, once proved they have become one of the most useful tools of the conformal geometer. Leverage in problems can be obtained by making a conformal change so that an appropriate curvature quantity is constant or vanishing.

There remains a large landscape of problems not yet solved, which will require yet new insights; and we have not even discussed all those that have already been attacked. Fully nonlinear Yamabe problems, nonlocal fractional curvatures, higher order boundary curvatures, CR Yamabe questions, extrinsic curvature on corners, and many other problems have seen enormous work and remain at the focus of bustling activity. The source of a whole vast literature, the Yamabe problem stands as an impressive reminder of the power of asking the right question.

## References

- [1]
- Simon Brendle,
*A family of curvature flows on surfaces with boundary*, Math. Z.**241**(2002), no. 4, 829–869, DOI 10.1007/s00209-002-0439-1. MR1942242,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{bren02}{article}{ author={Brendle, Simon}, title={A family of curvature flows on surfaces with boundary}, journal={Math. Z.}, volume={241}, date={2002}, number={4}, pages={829--869}, issn={0025-5874}, review={\MR {1942242}}, doi={10.1007/s00209-002-0439-1}, }`

- [2]
- Sun-Yung A. Chang and Paul C. Yang,
*Extremal metrics of zeta function determinants on -manifolds*, Ann. of Math. (2)**142**(1995), no. 1, 171–212, DOI 10.2307/2118613. MR1338677,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{cy95}{article}{ author={Chang, Sun-Yung A.}, author={Yang, Paul C.}, title={Extremal metrics of zeta function determinants on $4$-manifolds}, journal={Ann. of Math. (2)}, volume={142}, date={1995}, number={1}, pages={171--212}, issn={0003-486X}, review={\MR {1338677}}, doi={10.2307/2118613}, }`

- [3]
- X. X. Chen,
*Calabi flow in Riemann surfaces revisited: a new point of view*, Internat. Math. Res. Notices**6**(2001), 275–297, DOI 10.1155/S1073792801000149. MR1820328,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{chen01}{article}{ author={Chen, X. X.}, title={Calabi flow in Riemann surfaces revisited: a new point of view}, journal={Internat. Math. Res. Notices}, date={2001}, number={6}, pages={275--297}, issn={1073-7928}, review={\MR {1820328}}, doi={10.1155/S1073792801000149}, }`

- [4]
- Zindine Djadli and Andrea Malchiodi,
*Existence of conformal metrics with constant -curvature*, Ann. of Math. (2)**168**(2008), no. 3, 813–858, DOI 10.4007/annals.2008.168.813. MR2456884,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{dm08}{article}{ author={Djadli, Zindine}, author={Malchiodi, Andrea}, title={Existence of conformal metrics with constant $Q$-curvature}, journal={Ann. of Math. (2)}, volume={168}, date={2008}, number={3}, pages={813--858}, issn={0003-486X}, review={\MR {2456884}}, doi={10.4007/annals.2008.168.813}, }`

- [5]
- José F. Escobar,
*Conformal deformation of a Riemannian metric to a scalar flat metric with constant mean curvature on the boundary*, Ann. of Math. (2)**136**(1992), no. 1, 1–50, DOI 10.2307/2946545. MR1173925,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{esc92b}{article}{ author={Escobar, Jos\'{e} F.}, title={Conformal deformation of a Riemannian metric to a scalar flat metric with constant mean curvature on the boundary}, journal={Ann. of Math. (2)}, volume={136}, date={1992}, number={1}, pages={1--50}, issn={0003-486X}, review={\MR {1173925}}, doi={10.2307/2946545}, }`

- [6]
- Matthew J. Gursky and Andrea Malchiodi,
*A strong maximum principle for the Paneitz operator and a non-local flow for the -curvature*, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)**17**(2015), no. 9, 2137–2173, DOI 10.4171/JEMS/553. MR3420504,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{gm15}{article}{ author={Gursky, Matthew J.}, author={Malchiodi, Andrea}, title={A strong maximum principle for the Paneitz operator and a non-local flow for the $Q$-curvature}, journal={J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)}, volume={17}, date={2015}, number={9}, pages={2137--2173}, issn={1435-9855}, review={\MR {3420504}}, doi={10.4171/JEMS/553}, }`

- [7]
- John M. Lee and Thomas H. Parker,
*The Yamabe problem*, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)**17**(1987), no. 1, 37–91, DOI 10.1090/S0273-0979-1987-15514-5. MR888880,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{lp87}{article}{ author={Lee, John M.}, author={Parker, Thomas H.}, title={The Yamabe problem}, journal={Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)}, volume={17}, date={1987}, number={1}, pages={37--91}, issn={0273-0979}, review={\MR {888880}}, doi={10.1090/S0273-0979-1987-15514-5}, }`

- [8]
- Cheikh Birahim Ndiaye,
*Constant metrics in arbitrary dimension -curvature*, J. Funct. Anal.**251**(2007), no. 1, 1–58, DOI 10.1016/j.jfa.2007.06.008. MR2353700,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{ndi07}{article}{ author={Ndiaye, Cheikh Birahim}, title={Constant $Q$-curvature metrics in arbitrary dimension}, journal={J. Funct. Anal.}, volume={251}, date={2007}, number={1}, pages={1--58}, issn={0022-1236}, review={\MR {2353700}}, doi={10.1016/j.jfa.2007.06.008}, }`

- [9]
- Cheikh Birahim Ndiaye,
*Constant conformal metrics on 4-manifolds with boundary -curvature*, Pacific J. Math.**240**(2009), no. 1, 151–184, DOI 10.2140/pjm.2009.240.151. MR2485478,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{ndi09}{article}{ author={Ndiaye, Cheikh Birahim}, title={Constant $T$-curvature conformal metrics on 4-manifolds with boundary}, journal={Pacific J. Math.}, volume={240}, date={2009}, number={1}, pages={151--184}, issn={0030-8730}, review={\MR {2485478}}, doi={10.2140/pjm.2009.240.151}, }`

- [10]
- Cheikh Birahim Ndiaye, Yannick Sire, and Liming Sun,
*Uniformization theorems: between Yamabe and Paneitz*, Pacific J. Math.**314**(2021), no. 1, 115–159, DOI 10.2140/pjm.2021.314.115. MR4329973,## Show rawAMSref

`\bib{nss21}{article}{ author={Ndiaye, Cheikh Birahim}, author={Sire, Yannick}, author={Sun, Liming}, title={Uniformization theorems: between Yamabe and Paneitz}, journal={Pacific J. Math.}, volume={314}, date={2021}, number={1}, pages={115--159}, issn={0030-8730}, review={\MR {4329973}}, doi={10.2140/pjm.2021.314.115}, }`

## Credits

Photo of Stephen E. McKeown is courtesy of UT Dallas.

Photo of Cheikh Birahim Ndiaye is courtesy of Cheikh Birahim Ndiaye.