Weak partition properties for infinite cardinals. I
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by E. M. Kleinberg
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (1971), 371-374
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1971-0281626-7
- PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
Partition properties are perhaps the most fruitful of the various methods for defining and discussing large cardinals in set theory. In this paper we weaken in a natural way the most well known of these partition properties and examine the extent to which the cardinals defined remain “large."References
- P. Erdős and A. Hajnal, On the structure of set-mappings, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 9 (1958), 111–131. MR 95124, DOI 10.1007/BF02023868 —, Some remarks concerning our paper “On the structure of set mappings,” Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 9 (1958), 223-226. E. M. Kleinberg, Somewhat homogeneous sets. I, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1969), 840. Abstract #69T-E49. —, Somewhat homogeneous sets. II, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1969), 1088. Abstract #69T-E89. —, Somewhat homogeneous sets. III, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1970), 296. Abstract #70T-E9. —, Strong partition properties for infinite cardinals, Doctoral Dissertation, Rockefeller University, New York, 1969. J. Silver, Some applications of model theory in set theory, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1966.
- Robert M. Solovay, A nonconstructible $\Delta _3^1$ set of integers, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1967), 50–75. MR 211873, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9947-1967-0211873-5
Bibliographic Information
- © Copyright 1971 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (1971), 371-374
- MSC: Primary 04.60; Secondary 02.00
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1971-0281626-7
- MathSciNet review: 0281626