A non-Archimedean Stone-Banach theorem
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Edward Beckenstein and Lawrence Narici
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 100 (1987), 242-246
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1987-0884460-1
- PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
If the spaces $C(T,R)$ and $C(S,R)$ of continuous functions on $S$ and $T$ are linearly isometric, then $T$ and $S$ are homeomorphic. By the classical Stone-Banach theorem the only linear isometries of $C(T,R)$ onto $C(S,R)$ are of the form $x \to a(x \circ h)$, where $h$ is a homeomorphism of $S$ onto $T$ and $a \in C(S,F)$ is of magnitude 1 for all $s$ in $S$. What happens if $R$ is replaced by a field with a valuation? In brief, the result fails. We discuss "how" by way of developing a necessary and sufficient condition for the theorem to hold, along with some examples to illustrate the point.References
- Bernhard Banaschewski, Spaces of dimension zero, Canadian J. Math. 9 (1957), 38–46. MR 83120, DOI 10.4153/CJM-1957-006-7
- V. Kannan and M. Rajagopalan, Constructions and applications of rigid spaces. I, Adv. in Math. 29 (1978), no. 1, 89–130. MR 501093, DOI 10.1016/0001-8708(78)90006-3
- F. W. Lozier, A class of compact rigid $0$-dimensional spaces, Canadian J. Math. 21 (1969), 817–821. MR 244930, DOI 10.4153/CJM-1969-091-9
Bibliographic Information
- © Copyright 1987 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 100 (1987), 242-246
- MSC: Primary 46P05
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1987-0884460-1
- MathSciNet review: 884460