Criteria for irrationality of Euler’s constant
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Jonathan Sondow
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), 3335-3344
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07081-3
- Published electronically: March 11, 2003
- PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
By modifying Beukers’ proof of Apéry’s theorem that $\zeta (3)$ is irrational, we derive criteria for irrationality of Euler’s constant, $\gamma$. For $n>0$, we define a double integral $I_n$ and a positive integer $S_n$, and prove that with $d_n=\operatorname {LCM}(1,\dotsc ,n)$ the following are equivalent: 1. The fractional part of $\log S_n$ is given by $\{\log S_n\}=d_{2n}I_n$ for some $n$. 2. The formula holds for all sufficiently large $n$. 3. Euler’s constant is a rational number. A corollary is that if $\{\log S_n\}\ge 2^{-n}$ infinitely often, then $\gamma$ is irrational. Indeed, if the inequality holds for a given $n$ (we present numerical evidence for $1\le n\le 2500)$ and $\gamma$ is rational, then its denominator does not divide $d_{2n}\binom {2n}{n}$. We prove a new combinatorial identity in order to show that a certain linear form in logarithms is in fact $\log S_n$. A by-product is a rapidly converging asymptotic formula for $\gamma$, used by P. Sebah to compute $\gamma$ correct to 18063 decimals.References
- R. Apéry, Irrationalité de $\zeta (2)$ et $\zeta (3)$, Astérisque 61 (1979), 12–14.
- F. Beukers, A note on the irrationality of $\zeta (2)$ and $\zeta (3)$, Bull. London Math. Soc. 11 (1979), no. 3, 268–272. MR 554391, DOI 10.1112/blms/11.3.268
- S. Minakshi Sundaram, On non-linear partial differential equations of the hyperbolic type, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Sect. A. 9 (1939), 495–503. MR 0000089, DOI 10.1007/BF03046994
- Keith Ball and Tanguy Rivoal, Irrationalité d’une infinité de valeurs de la fonction zêta aux entiers impairs, Invent. Math. 146 (2001), no. 1, 193–207 (French). MR 1859021, DOI 10.1007/s002220100168
- Dirk Huylebrouck, Similarities in irrationality proofs for $\pi$, $\ln 2$, $\zeta (2)$, and $\zeta (3)$, Amer. Math. Monthly 108 (2001), no. 3, 222–231. MR 1834702, DOI 10.2307/2695383
- Yu. V. Nesterenko, Some remarks on $\zeta (3)$, Mat. Zametki 59 (1996), no. 6, 865–880, 960 (Russian, with Russian summary); English transl., Math. Notes 59 (1996), no. 5-6, 625–636. MR 1445472, DOI 10.1007/BF02307212
- Alfred van der Poorten, A proof that Euler missed$\ldots$Apéry’s proof of the irrationality of $\zeta (3)$, Math. Intelligencer 1 (1978/79), no. 4, 195–203. An informal report. MR 547748, DOI 10.1007/BF03028234
- J. Barkley Rosser and Lowell Schoenfeld, Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers, Illinois J. Math. 6 (1962), 64–94. MR 137689
- P. Sebah, personal communication, 30 July 2002.
- J. Sondow, Hypergeometric and double integrals for Euler’s constant, Amer. Math. Monthly, submitted.
- —, A hypergeometric approach, via linear forms involving logarithms, to irrationality criteria for Euler’s constant, CRM Conference Proceedings of CNTA 7 (May, 2002), to appear.
- —, An irrationality measure for Liouville numbers and conditional measures for Euler’s constant, in preparation.
- Noam D. Elkies and Benedict H. Gross, Cubic rings and the exceptional Jordan algebra, Duke Math. J. 109 (2001), no. 2, 383–409. MR 1845183, DOI 10.1215/S0012-7094-01-10924-1
Bibliographic Information
- Jonathan Sondow
- Affiliation: 209 West 97th Street, New York, New York 10025
- Email: jsondow@alumni.princeton.edu
- Received by editor(s): June 4, 2002
- Published electronically: March 11, 2003
- Communicated by: David E. Rohrlich
- © Copyright 2003 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (2003), 3335-3344
- MSC (2000): Primary 11J72; Secondary 05A19
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07081-3
- MathSciNet review: 1990621