Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society, the Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (PROC) is devoted to research articles of the highest quality in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

The proper and semi-proper forcing axioms for forcing notions that preserve $\aleph _2$ or $\aleph _3$
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Joel David Hamkins and Thomas A. Johnstone PDF
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 1823-1833 Request permission

Abstract:

We prove that the PFA lottery preparation of a strongly unfoldable cardinal $\kappa$ under $\neg 0^\sharp$ forces $\operatorname {PFA}(\aleph _2\text {-preserving})$, $\operatorname {PFA}(\aleph _3\text {-preserving})$ and $\operatorname {PFA}_{\aleph _2}$, with $2^\omega =\kappa =\aleph _2$. The method adapts to semi-proper forcing, giving $\operatorname {SPFA}(\aleph _2\text {-preserving})$, $\operatorname {SPFA}(\aleph _3\text {-preserving})$ and $\operatorname {SPFA}_{\aleph _2}$ from the same hypothesis. It follows by a result of Miyamoto that the existence of a strongly unfoldable cardinal is equiconsistent with the conjunction $\operatorname {SPFA}(\aleph _2\text {-preserving}) +\operatorname {SPFA}(\aleph _3\text {-preserving})+ \operatorname {SPFA}_{\aleph _2}+2^\omega =\aleph _2$. Since unfoldable cardinals are relatively weak as large cardinal notions, our summary conclusion is that in order to extract significant strength from PFA or SPFA, one must collapse $\aleph _3$ to $\aleph _1$.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2000): 03E55, 03E40
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2000): 03E55, 03E40
Additional Information
  • Joel David Hamkins
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, The Graduate Center of The City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10016 — and — Department of Mathematics, The College of Staten Island of The City University of New York, Staten Island, New York 10314
  • MR Author ID: 347679
  • Email: jhamkins@gc.cuny.edu
  • Thomas A. Johnstone
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, New York City College of Technology of The City University of New York, 300 Jay Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201
  • Email: tjohnstone@citytech.cuny.edu
  • Received by editor(s): November 20, 2007
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: August 13, 2008
  • Published electronically: December 15, 2008
  • Additional Notes: The research of the first author has been supported in part by grants from the CUNY Research Foundation and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), and he is grateful to the Institute of Logic, Language and Computation at Universiteit van Amsterdam for the support of a Visiting Professorship during his 2007 sabbatical there.
    Parts of this article are adapted from the second author’s Ph.D. dissertation, The Graduate Center of The City University of New York, June 2007
  • Communicated by: Julia Knight
  • © Copyright 2008 American Mathematical Society
    The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 1823-1833
  • MSC (2000): Primary 03E55, 03E40
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-08-09727-X
  • MathSciNet review: 2470843