Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

A new construction of Eisenstein’s completion of the Weierstrass zeta function
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Larry Rolen PDF
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 1453-1456 Request permission

Abstract:

In the theory of elliptic functions and elliptic curves, the Weierstrass $\zeta$ function plays a prominent role. Although it is not an elliptic function, Eisenstein constructed a simple (non-holomorphic) completion of this form which is doubly periodic. This theorem has begun to play an important role in the theory of harmonic Maass forms, and was crucial to work of Guerzhoy as well as Alfes, Griffin, Ono, and the author. In particular, this simple completion of $\zeta$ provides a powerful method to construct harmonic Maass forms of weight zero which serve as canonical lifts under the differential operator $\xi _0$ of weight 2 cusp forms, and this has been shown to have deep applications to determining vanishing criteria for central values and derivatives of twisted Hasse-Weil L-functions for elliptic curves.

Here we offer a new and motivated proof of Eisenstein’s theorem, relying on the basic theory of differential operators for Jacobi forms together with a classical identity for the first quasi-period of a lattice. A quick inspection of the proof shows that it also allows one to easily construct more general non-holomorphic elliptic functions.

References
  • C. Alfes, M. Griffin, K. Ono, and L. Rolen, Weierstrass mock modular forms and elliptic curves, accepted for publication in Research in Number Theory.
  • Rolf Berndt and Ralf Schmidt, Elements of the representation theory of the Jacobi group, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 163, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1998. MR 1634977, DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-0283-3
  • Martin Eichler and Don Zagier, The theory of Jacobi forms, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 55, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1985. MR 781735, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-9162-3
  • P. Guerzhoy, A mixed mock modular solution of the $KZ$ equation, accepted for publication in Ramanujan J.
  • Serge Lang, Elliptic functions, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 112, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987. With an appendix by J. Tate. MR 890960, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-4752-4
  • G. Oberdieck, A Serre derivative for even weight Jacobi forms, preprint, arxiv: 1209.5628.
  • Alexander Polishchuk, Abelian varieties, theta functions and the Fourier transform, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 153, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003. MR 1987784, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511546532
  • André Weil, Elliptic functions according to Eisenstein and Kronecker, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 88, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976. MR 0562289
  • Don Zagier, Elliptic modular forms and their applications, The 1-2-3 of modular forms, Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp. 1–103. MR 2409678, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74119-0_{1}
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Larry Rolen
  • Affiliation: Mathematisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Weyertal 86-90, D-50931 Köln, Germany
  • MR Author ID: 923990
  • ORCID: 0000-0001-8671-8117
  • Email: lrolen@math.uni-koeln.de
  • Received by editor(s): April 14, 2015
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: April 17, 2015
  • Published electronically: July 8, 2015
  • Additional Notes: The author thanks the University of Cologne and the DFG for their generous support via the University of Cologne postdoc grant DFG Grant D-72133-G-403-151001011. The author is also grateful to Ken Ono for his encouragement to write this note, and to Kathrin Bringmann, Michael Mertens, and the anonymous referee for useful comments. The author would also like to thank Martin Raum for pointing out the connection of this work with functions considered in [6], as well as Nikolaos Diamantis for pointing out connections to higher order modular forms as in the comment preceding the proof of Theorem 0.1.
  • Communicated by: Ken Ono
  • © Copyright 2015 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 1453-1456
  • MSC (2010): Primary 11F03, 11F37, 11F50, 33E05
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/12813
  • MathSciNet review: 3451223