The smallest prime in a conjugacy class and the first sign change for automorphic $L$-functions
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Peter J. Cho and Henry H. Kim
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), 923-933
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15233
- Published electronically: December 31, 2020
- PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
Let $K$ be an $S_n$-field. For a nonidentity conjugacy class $C$, define $N_{K,C}$ to be the smallest prime $p$ such that Frob$_p\in C$. By using the observation that $N_{K,C}$ is interpreted as the first prime sign change of the Dirichlet coefficients of automorphic $L$-functions, we improve the known bound on $N_{K,C}$ for $n=3,4,5$. (For $n=5$, we need to assume the strong Artin conjecture.)References
- Eric Bach and Jonathan Sorenson, Explicit bounds for primes in residue classes, Math. Comp. 65 (1996), no. 216, 1717–1735. MR 1355006, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-96-00763-6
- C. J. Bushnell and G. Henniart, An upper bound on conductors for pairs, J. Number Theory 65 (1997), no. 2, 183–196. MR 1462836, DOI 10.1006/jnth.1997.2142
- Frank Calegari, The Artin conjecture for some $S_5$-extensions, Math. Ann. 356 (2013), no. 1, 191–207. MR 3038126, DOI 10.1007/s00208-012-0839-4
- Peter J. Cho and Henry H. Kim, The average of the smallest prime in a conjugacy class, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 6 (2020), 1718–1747. MR 4089433, DOI 10.1093/imrn/rny074
- David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote, Abstract algebra, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2004. MR 2286236
- Zhenchao Ge, Micah B. Milinovich, and Paul Pollack, A note on the least prime that splits completely in a nonabelian Galois number field, Math. Z. 292 (2019), no. 1-2, 183–192. MR 3968898, DOI 10.1007/s00209-018-2162-6
- Henryk Iwaniec, Wenzhi Luo, and Peter Sarnak, Low lying zeros of families of $L$-functions, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 91 (2000), 55–131 (2001). MR 1828743, DOI 10.1007/BF02698741
- Gordon James and Martin Liebeck, Representations and characters of groups, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001. MR 1864147, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511814532
- Seokho Jin, On some first sign change problems of modular forms, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 472 (2019), no. 1, 577–583. MR 3906390, DOI 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.11.041
- J. C. Lagarias and A. M. Odlyzko, Effective versions of the Chebotarev density theorem, Algebraic number fields: $L$-functions and Galois properties (Proc. Sympos., Univ. Durham, Durham, 1975) Academic Press, London, 1977, pp. 409–464. MR 0447191
- Xiannan Li, Upper bounds on $L$-functions at the edge of the critical strip, IMRN 2010, no. 4, 727–755.
- Jianya Liu, Yan Qu, and Jie Wu, Two Linnik-type problems for automorphic $L$-functions, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 151 (2011), no. 2, 219–227. MR 2823131, DOI 10.1017/S0305004111000314
- Giuseppe Molteni, $L$-functions; Siegel-type theorems and structure theorems, PhD Thesis at University of Milan, 1999.
- Kaisa Matomäki, On signs of Fourier coefficients of cusp forms, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 152 (2012), no. 2, 207–222. MR 2887873, DOI 10.1017/S030500411100034X
- Carlos J. Moreno, Analytic proof of the strong multiplicity one theorem, Amer. J. Math. 107 (1985), no. 1, 163–206. MR 778093, DOI 10.2307/2374461
- M. Ram Murty, V. Kumar Murty, and N. Saradha, Modular forms and the Chebotarev density theorem, Amer. J. Math. 110 (1988), no. 2, 253–281. MR 935007, DOI 10.2307/2374502
- Karl K. Norton, A character-sum estimate and applications, Acta Arith. 85 (1998), no. 1, 51–78. MR 1623353, DOI 10.4064/aa-85-1-51-78
- Lillian B. Pierce, Caroline L. Turnage-Butterbaugh, and Melanie Matchett Wood, An effective Chebotarev density theorem for families of number fields, with an application to $\ell$-torsion in class groups, Invent. Math. 219 (2020), no. 2, 701–778. MR 4054810, DOI 10.1007/s00222-019-00915-z
- Yan Qu, Sign changes of Fourier coefficients of Maass eigenforms, Sci. China Math. 53 (2010), no. 1, 243–250. MR 2594763, DOI 10.1007/s11425-009-0219-z
- Asif Zaman, Bounding the least prime ideal in the Chebotarev density theorem, Funct. Approx. Comment. Math. 57 (2017), no. 1, 115–142. MR 3704230, DOI 10.7169/facm/1651
Bibliographic Information
- Peter J. Cho
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematical Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea
- MR Author ID: 939663
- Email: petercho@unist.ac.kr
- Henry H. Kim
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada; and Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, Korea
- MR Author ID: 324906
- Email: henrykim@math.toronto.edu
- Received by editor(s): November 19, 2019
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: January 9, 2020
- Published electronically: December 31, 2020
- Additional Notes: This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1F1A1062599).
The second author was partially supported by an NSERC grant #482564 - Communicated by: Amanda Folsom
- © Copyright 2020 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), 923-933
- MSC (2010): Primary 11N05; Secondary 11R44, 11R42
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15233
- MathSciNet review: 4211852