Springer motives
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Jens Niklas Eberhardt PDF
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), 1845-1856
Abstract:
We show that the motive of a Springer fiber is pure Tate. We then consider a category of equivariant Springer motives on the nilpotent cone and construct an equivalence to the derived category of graded modules over the graded affine Hecke algebra.References
- Joseph Ayoub, A guide to (étale) motivic sheaves, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Seoul 2014. Vol. II, Kyung Moon Sa, Seoul, 2014, pp. 1101–1124. MR 3728654
- Joseph Bernstein and Valery Lunts, Equivariant sheaves and functors, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1578, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994. MR 1299527, DOI 10.1007/BFb0073549
- Patrick Brosnan, On motivic decompositions arising from the method of Białynicki-Birula, Invent. Math. 161 (2005), no. 1, 91–111. MR 2178658, DOI 10.1007/s00222-004-0419-7
- Neil Chriss and Victor Ginzburg, Representation theory and complex geometry, Modern Birkhäuser Classics, Birkhäuser Boston, Ltd., Boston, MA, 2010. Reprint of the 1997 edition. MR 2838836, DOI 10.1007/978-0-8176-4938-8
- C. De Concini, G. Lusztig, and C. Procesi, Homology of the zero-set of a nilpotent vector field on a flag manifold, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1988), no. 1, 15–34. MR 924700, DOI 10.1090/S0894-0347-1988-0924700-2
- Jens Niklas Eberhardt, $K$-Motives and Koszul Duality, 2019.
- Jens Niklas Eberhardt and Shane Kelly, Mixed motives and geometric representation theory in equal characteristic, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 25 (2019), no. 2, Paper No. 30, 54. MR 3935029, DOI 10.1007/s00029-019-0475-x
- Annette Huber and Bruno Kahn, The slice filtration and mixed Tate motives, Compos. Math. 142 (2006), no. 4, 907–936. MR 2249535, DOI 10.1112/S0010437X06002107
- Marc Hoyois, Cdh descent in equivariant homotopy $K$-theory, 2016.
- Marc Hoyois, The six operations in equivariant motivic homotopy theory, Adv. Math. 305 (2017), 197–279. MR 3570135, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2016.09.031
- Jens Carsten Jantzen, Nilpotent orbits in representation theory, Lie theory, Progr. Math., vol. 228, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2004, pp. 1–211. MR 2042689
- Shane Kelly, Voevodsky motives and $l$dh-descent, Astérisque 391 (2017), 125 (English, with English and French summaries). MR 3673293
- George Lusztig, Affine Hecke algebras and their graded version, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1989), no. 3, 599–635. MR 991016, DOI 10.1090/S0894-0347-1989-0991016-9
- Carlo Mazza, Vladimir Voevodsky, and Charles Weibel, Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, Clay Mathematics Monographs, vol. 2, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA, 2006. MR 2242284
- Laura Rider, Formality for the nilpotent cone and a derived Springer correspondence, Adv. Math. 235 (2013), 208–236. MR 3010057, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2012.12.001
- Laura Rider and Amber Russell, Perverse sheaves on the nilpotent cone and Lusztig’s generalized Springer correspondence, Lie algebras, Lie superalgebras, vertex algebras and related topics, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 92, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2016, pp. 273–292. MR 3644235, DOI 10.1007/s10468-020-09966-w
- Laura Rider and Amber Russell, Formality and Lusztig’s generalized Springer correspondence, arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07783 (2017).
- Wolfgang Soergel, Rahbar Virk, and Matthias Wendt, Equivariant motives and geometric representation theory. (with an appendix by F. Hörmann and M. Wendt), arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.05480 (2018).
- Wolfgang Soergel and Matthias Wendt, Perverse motives and graded derived category ${\mathcal {O}}$, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 17 (2018), no. 2, 347–395. MR 3773272, DOI 10.1017/S1474748016000013
- Gufang Zhao and Changlong Zhong, Geometric representations of the formal affine Hecke algebra, Adv. Math. 317 (2017), 50–90. MR 3682663, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2017.03.026
Additional Information
- Jens Niklas Eberhardt
- Affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Mathematics, Vivatsgasse 7, 53111 Bonn, Germany
- MR Author ID: 1079619
- Email: mail@jenseberhardt.com
- Received by editor(s): January 9, 2019
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: April 13, 2020
- Published electronically: March 1, 2021
- Communicated by: Alexander Braverman
- © Copyright 2021 Copyright by the author
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), 1845-1856
- MSC (2020): Primary 20C08
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15290
- MathSciNet review: 4232181