Comparing the density of $D_4$ and $S_4$ quartic extensions of number fields
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Matthew Friedrichsen and Daniel Keliher
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), 2357-2369
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15358
- Published electronically: March 23, 2021
Abstract:
When ordered by discriminant, it is known that about 83% of quartic fields over $\mathbb {Q}$ have associated Galois group $S_4$, while the remaining 17% have Galois group $D_4$. We study these proportions over a general number field $F$. We find that asymptotically 100% of quadratic number fields have more $D_4$ extensions than $S_4$ and that the ratio between the number of $D_4$ and $S_4$ quartic extensions is biased arbitrarily in favor of $D_4$ extensions. Under Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, we give a lower bound that holds for general number fields.References
- Manjul Bhargava, The density of discriminants of quartic rings and fields, Ann. of Math. (2) 162 (2005), no. 2, 1031–1063. MR 2183288, DOI 10.4007/annals.2005.162.1031
- Manjul Bhargava, Arul Shankar, and Xiaoheng Wang, Geometry-of-numbers methods over global fields I: Prehomogeneous vector spaces, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1512.03035 (2015).
- Peter J. Cho and Henry H. Kim, Probabilistic properties of number fields, J. Number Theory 133 (2013), no. 12, 4175–4187. MR 3165634, DOI 10.1016/j.jnt.2013.06.009
- Henri Cohen, Francisco Diaz y Diaz, and Michel Olivier, Enumerating quartic dihedral extensions of $\Bbb Q$, Compositio Math. 133 (2002), no. 1, 65–93. MR 1918290, DOI 10.1023/A:1016310902973
- Harold Davenport, Multiplicative number theory, 3rd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 74, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000. Revised and with a preface by Hugh L. Montgomery. MR 1790423
- H. Davenport and H. Heilbronn, On the density of discriminants of cubic fields. II, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 322 (1971), no. 1551, 405–420., DOI 10.1098/rspa.1971.0075
- A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, The distribution of values of $L(1,\chi _d)$, Geom. Funct. Anal. 13 (2003), no. 5, 992–1028. MR 2024414, DOI 10.1007/s00039-003-0438-3
- Henryk Iwaniec and Emmanuel Kowalski, Analytic number theory, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 53, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. MR 2061214, DOI 10.1090/coll/053
- Robert J. Lemke Oliver and Frank Thorne, The number of ramified primes in number fields of small degree, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2017), no. 8, 3201–3210. MR 3652776, DOI 10.1090/proc/13467
- H. L. Montgomery and R. C. Vaughan, The large sieve, Mathematika 20 (1973), 119–134. MR 374060, DOI 10.1112/S0025579300004708
- Hugh L. Montgomery and Robert C. Vaughan, Multiplicative number theory. I. Classical theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 97, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. MR 2378655
- Jean-Pierre Serre, Lectures on the Mordell-Weil theorem, 3rd ed., Aspects of Mathematics, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, 1997. Translated from the French and edited by Martin Brown from notes by Michel Waldschmidt; With a foreword by Brown and Serre. MR 1757192, DOI 10.1007/978-3-663-10632-6
Bibliographic Information
- Matthew Friedrichsen
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155
- MR Author ID: 1273228
- ORCID: 0000-0002-9564-0451
- Email: matthew.friedrichsen@tufts.edu
- Daniel Keliher
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155
- ORCID: 0000-0001-5144-7898
- Email: daniel.keliher@tufts.edu
- Received by editor(s): October 22, 2019
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: September 28, 2020
- Published electronically: March 23, 2021
- Communicated by: Amanda Folsom
- © Copyright 2021 Copyright by the authors
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), 2357-2369
- MSC (2020): Primary 11R42, 11R29, 11R45, 11R16
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/15358
- MathSciNet review: 4246788