Root number bias for newforms
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Kimball Martin;
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 151 (2023), 3721-3736
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/16463
- Published electronically: June 16, 2023
- HTML | PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
Previously we observed that newforms obey a strict bias towards root number $+1$ in squarefree levels: at least half of the newforms in $S_k(\Gamma _0(N))$ with root number $+1$ for $N$ squarefree, and it is strictly more than half outside of a few special cases. Subsequently, other authors treated levels which are cubes of squarefree numbers. Here we treat arbitrary levels, and find that if the level is not the square of a squarefree number, this strict bias still holds for any weight. In fact the number of such exceptional levels is finite for fixed weight, and 0 if $k < 12$. We also investigate some variants of this question to better understand the exceptional levels.References
- A. O. L. Atkin and J. Lehner, Hecke operators on $\Gamma _{0}(m)$, Math. Ann. 185 (1970), 134–160. MR 268123, DOI 10.1007/BF01359701
- A. O. L. Atkin and Wen Ch’ing Winnie Li, Twists of newforms and pseudo-eigenvalues of $W$-operators, Invent. Math. 48 (1978), no. 3, 221–243. MR 508986, DOI 10.1007/BF01390245
- Harvey Cohn, A classical invitation to algebraic numbers and class fields, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1978. With two appendices by Olga Taussky: “Artin’s 1932 Göttingen lectures on class field theory” and “Connections between algebraic number theory and integral matrices”. MR 506156, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-9950-9
- Hiroaki Hijikata, Arnold K. Pizer, and Thomas R. Shemanske, The basis problem for modular forms on $\Gamma _0(N)$, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 82 (1989), no. 418, vi+159. MR 960090, DOI 10.1090/memo/0418
- Hiroaki Hijikata, Arnold K. Pizer, and Thomas R. Shemanske, Twists of newforms, J. Number Theory 35 (1990), no. 3, 287–324. MR 1062336, DOI 10.1016/0022-314X(90)90119-C
- The LMFDB Collaboration, The L-functions and Modular Forms Database, 2022. http://www.lmfdb.org.
- Zhilin Luo, Qinghua Pi, and Han Wu, Bias of root numbers for Hilbert newforms of cubic level, J. Number Theory 243 (2023), 62–116. MR 4492607, DOI 10.1016/j.jnt.2022.08.008
- Greg Martin, Dimensions of the spaces of cusp forms and newforms on $\Gamma _0(N)$ and $\Gamma _1(N)$, J. Number Theory 112 (2005), no. 2, 298–331. MR 2141534, DOI 10.1016/j.jnt.2004.10.009
- Kimball Martin, Refined dimensions of cusp forms, and equidistribution and bias of signs, J. Number Theory 188 (2018), 1–17. MR 3778620, DOI 10.1016/j.jnt.2018.01.015
- Kimball Martin, Congruences for modular forms $\textrm {mod}\,2$ and quaternionic $S$-ideal classes, Canad. J. Math. 70 (2018), no. 5, 1076–1095. MR 3831915, DOI 10.4153/CJM-2017-019-1
- Kimball Martin, The basis problem revisited, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020), no. 7, 4523–4559. MR 4127854, DOI 10.1090/tran/8077
- Ariel Pacetti, On the change of root numbers under twisting and applications, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 141 (2013), no. 8, 2615–2628. MR 3056552, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-2013-11532-7
- Qinghua Pi and Zhi Qi, Bias of root numbers for modular newforms of cubic level, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), no. 12, 5035–5047. MR 4327413, DOI 10.1090/proc/15530
- The Sage Developers, Sagemath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Version 9.4), 2021. https://www.sagemath.org.
- Nils-Peter Skoruppa and Don Zagier, Jacobi forms and a certain space of modular forms, Invent. Math. 94 (1988), no. 1, 113–146. MR 958592, DOI 10.1007/BF01394347
- Jerrold B. Tunnell, On the local Langlands conjecture for $GL(2)$, Invent. Math. 46 (1978), no. 2, 179–200. MR 476703, DOI 10.1007/BF01393255
- Masatoshi Yamauchi, On the traces of Hecke operators for a normalizer of $\Gamma _{0}(N)$, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 13 (1973), 403–411. MR 340179, DOI 10.1215/kjm/1250523380
- Yichao Zhang and Yang Zhou, Dimension formulas for modular form spaces with character for Fricke groups, Acta Arith. 206 (2022), no. 4, 291–311. MR 4528421, DOI 10.4064/aa211126-17-11
Bibliographic Information
- Kimball Martin
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
- MR Author ID: 719591
- Email: kimball.martin@ou.edu
- Received by editor(s): July 17, 2022
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: November 12, 2022, January 16, 2023, and January 17, 2023
- Published electronically: June 16, 2023
- Additional Notes: This work was supported by the Simons Foundation (Collaboration Grant 512927), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Invitational Fellowship L22540), and the Osaka Central Advanced Mathematical Institute (MEXT Joint Usage/Research Center on Mathematics and Theoretical Physics JPMXP0619217849).
- Communicated by: Amanda Folsom
- © Copyright 2023 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 151 (2023), 3721-3736
- MSC (2020): Primary 11F11
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/16463
- MathSciNet review: 4607618