Forcing more $\mathsf {DC}$ over the Chang model using the Thorn sequence
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by James Holland and Grigor Sargsyan;
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (2024), 3111-3122
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/16700
- Published electronically: May 22, 2024
- HTML | PDF | Request permission
Abstract:
In the context of $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}$, we force $\mathsf {DC}_\kappa$ for relations on $\mathcal {P}(\kappa )$ for arbitrarily large $\kappa <\aleph _\omega$ over the Chang model $\mathrm {L}(\mathrm {Ord}^\omega )$ making some assumptions on the thorn sequence defined by $Þ_0=\omega$, $Þ_{\alpha +1}$ as the least ordinal not a surjective image of $Þ_\alpha ^\omega$ and $Þ_\gamma =\sup _{\alpha <\gamma }Þ_\alpha$ for limit $\gamma$. These assumptions are motivated from results about $\Theta$ in the context of determinacy, and could be reasonable ways of thinking about the Chang model. Explicitly, we assume successor points $\lambda$ on the thorn sequence are strongly regular—meaning regular and functions $f:\kappa ^{<\kappa }\rightarrow \lambda$ are bounded whenever $\kappa <\lambda$ is on the thorn sequence—and justified—meaning $\mathcal {P}(\kappa ^\omega )\cap \mathrm {L}(\mathrm {Ord}^\omega )\subseteq \mathrm {L}_{\lambda }(\lambda ^\omega ,X)$ for some $X\subseteq \lambda$ for any $\kappa <\lambda$ on the thorn sequence. This allows us to use Cohen forcing and establish more dependent choice while preserving the thorn sequence and calculating it: $Þ_i=\aleph _{i+1}$ for $0<i<\omega$ after $i$ steps in the iteration.References
- Takehiko Gappo and Grigor Sargsyan, Determinacy in the Chang Model (2023). Unpublished.
- Akihiro Kanamori, The higher infinite, 2nd ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009. Large cardinals in set theory from their beginnings; Paperback reprint of the 2003 edition. MR 2731169
- Kenneth Kunen, A model for the negation of the axiom of choice, Cambridge Summer School in Mathematical Logic, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1973, pp. 489–494.
- Paul B. Larson and Grigor Sargsyan, Failures of square in $\mathbb {P}_{\mathrm {max}}$ extensions of Chang models, arXiv:2105.00322 (2021).
- Paul B. Larson, The stationary tower, University Lecture Series, vol. 32, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. Notes on a course by W. Hugh Woodin. MR 2069032, DOI 10.1090/ulect/032
Bibliographic Information
- James Holland
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08854
- Email: james.holland195@gmail.com
- Grigor Sargsyan
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdansk 81825, Poland
- MR Author ID: 677243
- ORCID: 0000-0002-6095-1997
- Email: gsargsyan@impan.pl
- Received by editor(s): March 7, 2023
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: September 15, 2023
- Published electronically: May 22, 2024
- Communicated by: Vera Fischer
- © Copyright 2024 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (2024), 3111-3122
- MSC (2020): Primary 03E25, 03E40, 03E45
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/16700
- MathSciNet review: 4753292