Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2024 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Forcing more $\mathsf {DC}$ over the Chang model using the Thorn sequence
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by James Holland and Grigor Sargsyan;
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (2024), 3111-3122
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/16700
Published electronically: May 22, 2024

Abstract:

In the context of $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}$, we force $\mathsf {DC}_\kappa$ for relations on $\mathcal {P}(\kappa )$ for arbitrarily large $\kappa <\aleph _\omega$ over the Chang model $\mathrm {L}(\mathrm {Ord}^\omega )$ making some assumptions on the thorn sequence defined by $Þ_0=\omega$, $Þ_{\alpha +1}$ as the least ordinal not a surjective image of $Þ_\alpha ^\omega$ and $Þ_\gamma =\sup _{\alpha <\gamma }Þ_\alpha$ for limit $\gamma$. These assumptions are motivated from results about $\Theta$ in the context of determinacy, and could be reasonable ways of thinking about the Chang model. Explicitly, we assume successor points $\lambda$ on the thorn sequence are strongly regular—meaning regular and functions $f:\kappa ^{<\kappa }\rightarrow \lambda$ are bounded whenever $\kappa <\lambda$ is on the thorn sequence—and justified—meaning $\mathcal {P}(\kappa ^\omega )\cap \mathrm {L}(\mathrm {Ord}^\omega )\subseteq \mathrm {L}_{\lambda }(\lambda ^\omega ,X)$ for some $X\subseteq \lambda$ for any $\kappa <\lambda$ on the thorn sequence. This allows us to use Cohen forcing and establish more dependent choice while preserving the thorn sequence and calculating it: $Þ_i=\aleph _{i+1}$ for $0<i<\omega$ after $i$ steps in the iteration.
References
  • Takehiko Gappo and Grigor Sargsyan, Determinacy in the Chang Model (2023). Unpublished.
  • Akihiro Kanamori, The higher infinite, 2nd ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009. Large cardinals in set theory from their beginnings; Paperback reprint of the 2003 edition. MR 2731169
  • Kenneth Kunen, A model for the negation of the axiom of choice, Cambridge Summer School in Mathematical Logic, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1973, pp. 489–494.
  • Paul B. Larson and Grigor Sargsyan, Failures of square in $\mathbb {P}_{\mathrm {max}}$ extensions of Chang models, arXiv:2105.00322 (2021).
  • Paul B. Larson, The stationary tower, University Lecture Series, vol. 32, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. Notes on a course by W. Hugh Woodin. MR 2069032, DOI 10.1090/ulect/032
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2020): 03E25, 03E40, 03E45
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2020): 03E25, 03E40, 03E45
Bibliographic Information
  • James Holland
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08854
  • Email: james.holland195@gmail.com
  • Grigor Sargsyan
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Gdansk 81825, Poland
  • MR Author ID: 677243
  • ORCID: 0000-0002-6095-1997
  • Email: gsargsyan@impan.pl
  • Received by editor(s): March 7, 2023
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: September 15, 2023
  • Published electronically: May 22, 2024
  • Communicated by: Vera Fischer
  • © Copyright 2024 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (2024), 3111-3122
  • MSC (2020): Primary 03E25, 03E40, 03E45
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/16700
  • MathSciNet review: 4753292