Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Hypergeometric sheaves for classical groups via geometric Langlands
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Masoud Kamgarpour, Daxin Xu and Lingfei Yi PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), 3585-3640 Request permission

Abstract:

In a previous paper, the first and third authors gave an explicit realization of the geometric Langlands correspondence for hypergeometric sheaves, considered as $\mathrm {GL}_n$-local systems. Certain hypergeometric local systems admit a symplectic or orthogonal structure, which can be viewed as $\check {G}$-local systems, for a classical group $\check {G}$. This article aims to realize the geometric Langlands correspondence for these $\check {G}$-local systems.

We study this problem from two aspects. In the first approach, we define the hypergeometric automorphic data for a classical group $G$ in the framework of Yun, one of whose local components is a new class of euphotic representations in the sense of Jakob–Yun. We prove the rigidity of hypergeometric automorphic data under natural assumptions, which allows us to define $\check {G}$-local systems $\mathcal {E}_{\check {G}}$ on $\mathbb {G}_m$ as Hecke eigenvalues (in both $\ell$-adic and de Rham settings). In the second approach (which works only in the de Rham setting), we quantize a ramified Hitchin system, following Beilinson–Drinfeld and Zhu, and identify $\mathcal {E}_{\check {G}}$ with certain $\check {G}$-opers on $\mathbb {G}_m$. Finally, we compare these $\check {G}$-opers with hypergeometric local systems.

References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Masoud Kamgarpour
  • Affiliation: School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Australia.
  • MR Author ID: 889657
  • Email: masoud@uq.edu.au
  • Daxin Xu
  • Affiliation: Morningside Center of Mathematics and Hua Loo-Keng Key Laboratory of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China; and School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
  • Email: daxin.xu@amss.ac.cn
  • Lingfei Yi
  • Affiliation: School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
  • MR Author ID: 1473086
  • ORCID: 0000-0001-8517-5499
  • Email: lyi@umn.edu
  • Received by editor(s): January 26, 2022
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: October 12, 2022
  • Published electronically: January 27, 2023
  • Additional Notes: The first author was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant. The second author was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant (nos. 12222118, 12288201) and CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research, Grant No. YSBR-033.
  • © Copyright 2023 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), 3585-3640
  • MSC (2020): Primary 14D24; Secondary 17B67, 20G25, 22E50, 22E57
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8848
  • MathSciNet review: 4577342