Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Polynomial structures for nilpotent groups
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Karel Dekimpe, Paul Igodt and Kyung Bai Lee PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348 (1996), 77-97 Request permission

Abstract:

If a polycyclic-by-finite rank-$K$ group $\Gamma$ admits a faithful affine representation making it acting on $\mathbb {R}{K}$ properly discontinuously and with compact quotient, we say that $\Gamma$ admits an affine structure. In 1977, John Milnor questioned the existence of affine structures for such groups $\Gamma$. Very recently examples have been obtained showing that, even for torsion-free, finitely generated nilpotent groups $N$, affine structures do not always exist. It looks natural to consider affine structures as examples of polynomial structures of degree one. We introduce the concept of a canonical type polynomial structure for polycyclic-by-finite groups. Using the algebraic framework of the Seifert Fiber Space construction and a nice cohomology vanishing theorem, we prove the existence and uniqueness (up to conjugation) of canonical type polynomial structures for virtually finitely generated nilpotent groups. Applying this uniqueness to a result going back to Mal′cev, it follows that, for torsion-free, finitely generated nilpotent groups, each canonical polynomial structure is expressed in polynomials of limited degree. The minimal degree needed for obtaining a polynomial structure will determine the “affine defect number”. We prove that the known counterexamples to Milnor’s question have the smallest possible affine defect, i.e. affine defect number equal to one.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (1991): 57S30, 22E40, 22E25
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (1991): 57S30, 22E40, 22E25
Additional Information
  • Paul Igodt
  • Affiliation: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Campus Kortrijk, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
  • Email: Paul.Igodt@kulak.ac.be
  • Kyung Bai Lee
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
  • Email: kblee@dstn3.math.uoknor.edu
  • Received by editor(s): May 8, 1994
  • Additional Notes: The first author is Research Assistant of the National Fund For Scientific Research (Belgium)
  • © Copyright 1996 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348 (1996), 77-97
  • MSC (1991): Primary 57S30, 22E40, 22E25
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01513-9
  • MathSciNet review: 1327254