Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

How to make a triangulation of $S^3$ polytopal
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Simon A. King PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), 4519-4542 Request permission

Abstract:

We introduce a numerical isomorphism invariant $p(\mathcal {T})$ for any triangulation $\mathcal {T}$ of $S^3$. Although its definition is purely topological (inspired by the bridge number of knots), $p(\mathcal {T})$ reflects the geometric properties of $\mathcal {T}$. Specifically, if $\mathcal {T}$ is polytopal or shellable, then $p(\mathcal {T})$ is “small” in the sense that we obtain a linear upper bound for $p(\mathcal {T})$ in the number $n=n(\mathcal {T})$ of tetrahedra of $\mathcal {T}$. Conversely, if $p(\mathcal {T})$ is “small”, then $\mathcal {T}$ is “almost” polytopal, since we show how to transform $\mathcal {T}$ into a polytopal triangulation by $O((p(\mathcal {T}))^2)$ local subdivisions. The minimal number of local subdivisions needed to transform $\mathcal {T}$ into a polytopal triangulation is at least $\frac {p(\mathcal {T})}{3n}-n-2$. Using our previous results [The size of triangulations supporting a given link, Geometry & Topology 5 (2001), 369–398], we obtain a general upper bound for $p(\mathcal {T})$ exponential in $n^2$. We prove here by explicit constructions that there is no general subexponential upper bound for $p(\mathcal {T})$ in $n$. Thus, we obtain triangulations that are “very far” from being polytopal. Our results yield a recognition algorithm for $S^3$ that is conceptually simpler, although somewhat slower, than the famous Rubinstein–Thompson algorithm.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Simon A. King
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schlossgartenstr. 7, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
  • Email: king@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de
  • Received by editor(s): May 28, 2002
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: July 1, 2003
  • Published electronically: February 27, 2004
  • © Copyright 2004 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), 4519-4542
  • MSC (2000): Primary 52B11, 57M25; Secondary 57M15, 05C10, 52B22
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-04-03465-8
  • MathSciNet review: 2067132