On Coxeter diagrams of complex reflection groups
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Tathagata Basak PDF
- Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 4909-4936 Request permission
Abstract:
We study Coxeter diagrams of some unitary reflection groups. Using solely the combinatorics of diagrams, we give a new proof of the classification of root lattices defined over $\mathcal {E} = \mathbb {Z}[e^{ 2 \pi i/3}]$: there are only four such lattices, namely, the $\mathcal {E}$-lattices whose real forms are $A_2$, $D_4$, $E_6$ and $E_8$. Next, we address the issue of characterizing the diagrams for unitary reflection groups, a question that was raised by Broué, Malle and Rouquier. To this end, we describe an algorithm which, given a unitary reflection group $G$, picks out a set of complex reflections. The algorithm is based on an analogy with Weyl groups. If $G$ is a Weyl group, the algorithm immediately yields a set of simple roots. Experimentally, we observe that if $G$ is primitive and $G$ has a set of roots whose $\mathbb {Z}$-span is a discrete subset of the ambient vector space, then the algorithm selects a minimal generating set for $G$. The group $G$ has a presentation on these generators such that if we forget that the generators have finite order, then we get a (Coxeter-like) presentation of the corresponding braid group. For some groups, such as $G_{33}$ and $G_{34}$, new diagrams are obtained. For $G_{34}$, our new diagram extends to an “affine diagram” with $\mathbb {Z}/7\mathbb {Z}$ symmetry.References
- Daniel Allcock, On the $Y_{555}$ complex reflection group, J. Algebra 322 (2009), no. 5, 1454–1465. MR 2543618, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.05.027
- Tathagata Basak, Complex reflection groups and Dynkin diagrams, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2006. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Berkeley. MR 2709948
- Tathagata Basak, The complex Lorentzian Leech lattice and the Bimonster, J. Algebra 309 (2007), no. 1, 32–56. MR 2301231, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.05.033
- D. Bessis, Finite complex reflection arrangements are $K(\pi ,1)$, Preprint, arXiv:math.GT/0610777.
- David Bessis and Jean Michel, Explicit presentations for exceptional braid groups, Experiment. Math. 13 (2004), no. 3, 257–266. MR 2103323
- Michel Broué, Gunter Malle, and Raphaël Rouquier, Complex reflection groups, braid groups, Hecke algebras, J. Reine Angew. Math. 500 (1998), 127–190. MR 1637497
- Arjeh M. Cohen, Finite complex reflection groups, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 9 (1976), no. 3, 379–436. MR 422448
- John H. Conway and Christopher S. Simons, 26 implies the Bimonster, J. Algebra 235 (2001), no. 2, 805–814. MR 1805481, DOI 10.1006/jabr.2000.8494
- J. H. Conway, N. Sloane, Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag (1998).
- H. S. M. Coxeter, Finite groups generated by unitary reflections, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 31 (1967), 125–135. MR 230800, DOI 10.1007/BF02992390
- M. C. Hughes, Complex reflection groups, Comm. Algebra 18 (1990), no. 12, 3999–4029. MR 1084439, DOI 10.1080/00927879008824120
- Peter Orlik and Louis Solomon, Unitary reflection groups and cohomology, Invent. Math. 59 (1980), no. 1, 77–94. MR 575083, DOI 10.1007/BF01390316
- G. C. Shephard and J. A. Todd, Finite unitary reflection groups, Canad. J. Math. 6 (1954), 274–304. MR 59914, DOI 10.4153/cjm-1954-028-3
Additional Information
- Tathagata Basak
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Carver Hall, Ames, Iowa 50011
- Email: tathastu@gmail.com
- Received by editor(s): September 25, 2009
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: July 27, 2010, and December 3, 2010
- Published electronically: April 25, 2012
- © Copyright 2012
American Mathematical Society
The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication. - Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 4909-4936
- MSC (2010): Primary 20F55, 20F05, 20F65, 51F25
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2012-05517-6
- MathSciNet review: 2922614