Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Constructing regular ultrafilters from a model-theoretic point of view
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by M. Malliaris and S. Shelah PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 367 (2015), 8139-8173 Request permission

Abstract:

This paper contributes to the set-theoretic side of understanding Keisler’s order. We consider properties of ultrafilters which affect saturation of unstable theories: the lower cofinality $\mathrm {lcf}(\aleph _0, \mathcal {D})$ of $\aleph _0$ modulo $\mathcal {D}$, saturation of the minimum unstable theory (the random graph), flexibility, goodness, goodness for equality, and realization of symmetric cuts. We work in ZFC except when noted, as several constructions appeal to complete ultrafilters and thus assume a measurable cardinal. The main results are as follows. First, we investigate the strength of flexibility, known to be detected by non-low theories. Assuming $\kappa > \aleph _0$ is measurable, we construct a regular ultrafilter on $\lambda \geq 2^\kappa$ which is flexible but not good, and which moreover has large $\mathrm {lcf}(\aleph _0)$ but does not even saturate models of the random graph. This implies (a) that flexibility alone cannot characterize saturation of any theory, however (b) by separating flexibility from goodness, we remove a main obstacle to proving non-low does not imply maximal. Since flexible is precisely OK, this also shows that (c) from a set-theoretic point of view, consistently, OK need not imply good, addressing a problem from Dow (1985). Second, under no additional assumptions, we prove that there is a loss of saturation in regular ultrapowers of unstable theories, and also give a new proof that there is a loss of saturation in ultrapowers of non-simple theories. More precisely, for $\mathcal {D}$ regular on $\kappa$ and $M$ a model of an unstable theory, $M^\kappa /\mathcal {D}$ is not $(2^\kappa )^+$-saturated; and for $M$ a model of a non-simple theory and $\lambda = \lambda ^{<\lambda }$, $M^\lambda /\mathcal {D}$ is not $\lambda ^{++}$-saturated. In the third part of the paper, we investigate realization and omission of symmetric cuts, significant both because of the maximality of the strict order property in Keisler’s order, and by recent work of the authors on $SOP_2$. We prove that if $\mathcal {D}$ is a $\kappa$-complete ultrafilter on $\kappa$, any ultrapower of a sufficiently saturated model of linear order will have no $(\kappa , \kappa )$-cuts, and that if $\mathcal {D}$ is also normal, it will have a $(\kappa ^+, \kappa ^+)$-cut. We apply this to prove that for any $n < \omega$, assuming the existence of $n$ measurable cardinals below $\lambda$, there is a regular ultrafilter $D$ on $\lambda$ such that any $D$-ultrapower of a model of linear order will have $n$ alternations of cuts, as defined below. Moreover, $D$ will $\lambda ^+$-saturate all stable theories but will not $(2^{\kappa })^+$-saturate any unstable theory, where $\kappa$ is the smallest measurable cardinal used in the construction.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2010): 03C20, 03C45, 03E05
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 03C20, 03C45, 03E05
Additional Information
  • M. Malliaris
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, 5734 S. University Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • MR Author ID: 864805
  • Email: mem@math.uchicago.edu
  • S. Shelah
  • Affiliation: Einstein Institute of Mathematics, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel – and – Department of Mathematics, Hill Center - Busch Campus, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 110 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8019
  • MR Author ID: 160185
  • ORCID: 0000-0003-0462-3152
  • Email: shelah@math.huji.ac.il
  • Received by editor(s): March 22, 2012
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: September 10, 2013
  • Published electronically: February 18, 2015
  • Additional Notes: The first author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1001666
    The second author was partially supported by grants DMS-0600940 and 1101597 and by a Gödel fellowship. The second author was also partially supported by the Israel Science Foundation grant 710/07. This is paper 996 in the second author’s list of publications
  • © Copyright 2015 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 367 (2015), 8139-8173
  • MSC (2010): Primary 03C20, 03C45, 03E05
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2015-06303-X
  • MathSciNet review: 3391912