Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

On embedding certain partial orders into the P-points under Rudin-Keisler and Tukey reducibility
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Dilip Raghavan and Saharon Shelah PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), 4433-4455 Request permission

Abstract:

The study of the global structure of ultrafilters on the natural numbers with respect to the quasi-orders of Rudin-Keisler and Rudin-Blass reducibility was initiated in the 1970s by Blass, Keisler, Kunen, and Rudin. In a 1973 paper Blass studied the special class of P-points under the quasi-ordering of Rudin-Keisler reducibility. He asked what partially ordered sets can be embedded into the P-points when the P-points are equipped with this ordering. This question is of most interest under some hypothesis that guarantees the existence of many P-points, such as Martin’s axiom for $\sigma$-centered posets. In his 1973 paper he showed under this assumption that both ${\omega }_{1}$ and the reals can be embedded. Analogous results were obtained later for the coarser notion of Tukey reducibility. We prove in this paper that Martin’s axiom for $\sigma$-centered posets implies that the Boolean algebra $\mathcal {P}(\omega ) / \operatorname {FIN}$ equipped with its natural partial order can be embedded into the P-points both under Rudin-Keisler and Tukey reducibility. Consequently, the continuum hypothesis implies that every partial order of size at most continuum embeds into the P-points under both notions of reducibility.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Dilip Raghavan
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119076
  • MR Author ID: 870765
  • Email: dilip.raghavan@protonmail.com
  • Saharon Shelah
  • Affiliation: Einstein Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel
  • MR Author ID: 160185
  • ORCID: 0000-0003-0462-3152
  • Email: shelah@math.huji.ac.il
  • Received by editor(s): November 9, 2014
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: May 10, 2015, and January 28, 2016
  • Published electronically: January 9, 2017
  • Additional Notes: The first author was partially supported by National University of Singapore research grant number R-146-000-161-133.
    The second author’s research was partially supported by European Research Council grant 338821. Publication 1058 on Shelah’s list.
    Both authors’ research was partially supported by NSF grants DMS 0600940 and DMS 1101597.
  • © Copyright 2017 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), 4433-4455
  • MSC (2010): Primary 03E50, 03E05, 03E35, 54D80
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/6943
  • MathSciNet review: 3624416