Skip to Main Content

Mathematics of Computation

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1960 (published as Mathematical Tables and other Aids to Computation 1943-1959), Mathematics of Computation is devoted to research articles of the highest quality in computational mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6842 (online) ISSN 0025-5718 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Mathematics of Computation is 1.78.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

On some fast well-balanced first order solvers for nonconservative systems
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Manuel J. Castro, Alberto Pardo, Carlos Parés and E. F. Toro PDF
Math. Comp. 79 (2010), 1427-1472 Request permission

Abstract:

The goal of this article is to design robust and simple first order explicit solvers for one-dimensional nonconservative hyperbolic systems. These solvers are intended to be used as the basis for higher order methods for one or multidimensional problems. The starting point for the development of these solvers is the general definition of a Roe linearization introduced by Toumi in 1992 based on the use of a family of paths. Using this concept, Roe methods can be extended to nonconservative systems. These methods have good well-balanced and robustness properties, but they have also some drawbacks: in particular, their implementation requires the explicit knowledge of the eigenstructure of the intermediate matrices. Our goal here is to design numerical methods based on a Roe linearization which overcome this drawback. The idea is to split the Roe matrices into two parts which are used to calculate the contributions at the cells to the right and to the left, respectively. This strategy is used to generate two different one-parameter families of schemes which contain, as particular cases, some generalizations to nonconservative systems of the well-known Lax-Friedrichs, Lax-Wendroff, FORCE, and GFORCE schemes. Some numerical experiments are presented to compare the behaviors of the schemes introduced here with Roe methods.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Manuel J. Castro
  • Affiliation: Universidad de Málaga, Departamento Análisis Matemático, Campus de Teatinos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain
  • Email: castro@anamat.cie.uma.es
  • Alberto Pardo
  • Affiliation: Universidad de Málaga, Departamento Análisis Matemático, Campus de Teatinos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain
  • Email: pardo@anamat.cie.uma.es
  • Carlos Parés
  • Affiliation: Universidad de Málaga, Departamento Análisis Matemático, Campus de Teatinos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain
  • Email: pares@anamat.cie.uma.es
  • E. F. Toro
  • Affiliation: University of Trento. Laboratory of Applied Mathematics. Faculty of Engineering, 38050 Mesiano di Povo, Trento, Italy
  • Email: toroe@ing.unitn.it
  • Received by editor(s): November 24, 2008
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: May 11, 2009
  • Published electronically: November 23, 2009
  • Additional Notes: This research has been partially supported by the Spanish Government Research project MTM2006-08075. The numerical computations have been performed at the Laboratory of Numerical Methods of the University of Málaga.
  • © Copyright 2009 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Math. Comp. 79 (2010), 1427-1472
  • MSC (2000): Primary 74S10, 65M06, 35L60, 35L65, 35L67
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-09-02317-5
  • MathSciNet review: 2629999