Skip to Main Content

Mathematics of Computation

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1960 (published as Mathematical Tables and other Aids to Computation 1943-1959), Mathematics of Computation is devoted to research articles of the highest quality in computational mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6842 (online) ISSN 0025-5718 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Mathematics of Computation is 1.78.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Super-resolution of time-splitting methods for the Dirac equation in the nonrelativistic regime
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Weizhu Bao, Yongyong Cai and Jia Yin HTML | PDF
Math. Comp. 89 (2020), 2141-2173 Request permission

Abstract:

We establish error bounds of the Lie-Trotter splitting ($S_1$) and Strang splitting ($S_2$) for the Dirac equation in the nonrelativistic regime in the absence of external magnetic potentials, with a small parameter $0<\varepsilon \leq 1$ inversely proportional to the speed of light. In this regime, the solution propagates waves with $O(\varepsilon ^2)$ wavelength in time. Surprisingly, we find out that the splitting methods exhibit super-resolution, i.e., the methods can capture the solutions accurately even if the time step size $\tau$ is independent of $\varepsilon$, while the wavelength in time is at $O(\varepsilon ^2)$. $S_1$ shows $1/2$ order convergence uniformly with respect to $\varepsilon$, by establishing that there are two independent error bounds $\tau + \varepsilon$ and $\tau + \tau /\varepsilon$. Moreover, if $\tau$ is nonresonant, i.e., $\tau$ is away from a certain region determined by $\varepsilon$, $S_1$ would yield an improved uniform first order $O(\tau )$ error bound. In addition, we show $S_2$ is uniformly convergent with $1/2$ order rate for general time step size $\tau$ and uniformly convergent with $3/2$ order rate for nonresonant time step size. Finally, numerical examples are reported to validate our findings.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Weizhu Bao
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119076
  • MR Author ID: 354327
  • Email: matbaowz@nus.edu.sg
  • Yongyong Cai
  • Affiliation: School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, 100875, People’s Republic of China; and Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100193, People’s Republic of China
  • MR Author ID: 819002
  • Email: yongyong.cai@bnu.edu.cn
  • Jia Yin
  • Affiliation: NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering (NGS), National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456
  • MR Author ID: 1169777
  • Email: matyinj@nus.edu.sg
  • Received by editor(s): February 21, 2019
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: December 4, 2019, and January 18, 2020
  • Published electronically: April 23, 2020
  • Additional Notes: This work was partially done when the first author was visiting the Courant Institute for Mathematical Sciences in 2018. Part of this work was done when the authors visited the Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore, in 2019.
    The first and third authors acknowledge support from the Ministry of Education of Singapore grant R-146-000-247-114
    The second author acknowledges support from NSFC grant No. 11771036 and 91630204.
  • © Copyright 2020 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Math. Comp. 89 (2020), 2141-2173
  • MSC (2010): Primary 35Q41, 65M70, 65N35, 81Q05
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3536
  • MathSciNet review: 4109563