Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

On the equality conditions of the Brunn-Minkowski theorem
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Daniel A. Klain PDF
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), 3719-3726 Request permission

Abstract:

This article describes a new proof of the equality condition for the Brunn-Minkowski inequality. The Brunn-Minkowski Theorem asserts that, for compact convex sets $K,L \subseteq \mathbb {R}^n$, the $n$-th root of the Euclidean volume $V_n$ is concave with respect to Minkowski combinations; that is, for $\lambda \in [0,1]$, \[ V_{n}((1-\lambda )K + \lambda L)^{1/n} \geq (1-\lambda ) V_{n}(K)^{1/n} + \lambda V_{n}(L)^{1/n}.\] The equality condition asserts that if $K$ and $L$ both have positive volume, then equality holds for some $\lambda \in (0,1)$ if and only if $K$ and $L$ are homothetic.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Daniel A. Klain
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854
  • Email: Daniel_Klain@uml.edu
  • Received by editor(s): May 9, 2010
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: September 2, 2010
  • Published electronically: February 24, 2011
  • Communicated by: Thomas Schlumprecht
  • © Copyright 2011 American Mathematical Society
    The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), 3719-3726
  • MSC (2010): Primary 52A20, 52A38, 52A39, 52A40
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-10822-0
  • MathSciNet review: 2813401