Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Similarity of quadratic forms and isomorphism of their function fields
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Adrian R. Wadsworth PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 208 (1975), 352-358 Request permission

Abstract:

This paper considers the question: Given anisotropic quadratic forms $Q$ and $Q’$ over a field $K$ (char $K \ne 2$), if their function fields are isomorphic must $Q$ and $Q’$ be similar? It is proved that the answer is yes if $Q$ is a Pfister form or the pure part of a Pfister form, or a $4$-dimensional form. The argument for Pfister forms and their pure parts does not generalize because these are the only anisotropic forms which attain maximal Witt index over their function fields. To handle the $4$-dimensional case the following theorem is proved: If $Q$ and $Q’$ are two $4$-dimensional forms over $K$ with the same determinant $d$, then $Q$ and $Q’$ are similar over $K$ iff they are similar over $K[\sqrt d ]$. The example of Pfister neighbors suggests that quadratic forms arguments are unlikely to settle the original question for other kinds of forms.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC: 10C05, 15A63
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC: 10C05, 15A63
Additional Information
  • © Copyright 1975 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 208 (1975), 352-358
  • MSC: Primary 10C05; Secondary 15A63
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1975-0376527-8
  • MathSciNet review: 0376527