Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Complete reducibility and separability
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Michael Bate, Benjamin Martin, Gerhard Röhrle and Rudolf Tange PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 4283-4311 Request permission

Abstract:

Let $G$ be a reductive linear algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p > 0$. A subgroup of $G$ is said to be separable in $G$ if its global and infinitesimal centralizers have the same dimension. We study the interaction between the notion of separability and Serre’s concept of $G$-complete reducibility for subgroups of $G$. A separability hypothesis appears in many general theorems concerning $G$-complete reducibility. We demonstrate that some of these results fail without this hypothesis. On the other hand, we prove that if $G$ is a connected reductive group and $p$ is very good for $G$, then any subgroup of $G$ is separable; we deduce that under these hypotheses on $G$, a subgroup $H$ of $G$ is $G$-completely reducible provided Lie $G$ is semisimple as an $H$-module.

Recently, Guralnick has proved that if $H$ is a reductive subgroup of $G$ and $C$ is a conjugacy class of $G$, then $C\cap H$ is a finite union of $H$-conjugacy classes. For generic $p$ — when certain extra hypotheses hold, including separability — this follows from a well-known tangent space argument due to Richardson, but in general, it rests on Lusztig’s deep result that a connected reductive group has only finitely many unipotent conjugacy classes. We show that the analogue of Guralnick’s result is false if one considers conjugacy classes of $n$-tuples of elements from $H$ for $n > 1$.

References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2000): 20G15, 14L24
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2000): 20G15, 14L24
Additional Information
  • Michael Bate
  • Affiliation: Christ Church College, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 1DP, United Kingdom
  • Address at time of publication: Department of Mathematics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
  • Email: bate@maths.ox.ac.uk, meb505@york.ac.uk
  • Benjamin Martin
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
  • MR Author ID: 659870
  • Email: B.Martin@math.canterbury.ac.nz
  • Gerhard Röhrle
  • Affiliation: Fakultät für Mathematik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
  • MR Author ID: 329365
  • Email: gerhard.roehrle@rub.de
  • Rudolf Tange
  • Affiliation: Fakultät für Mathematik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
  • Address at time of publication: Department of Mathematics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
  • Email: rudolf.tange@rub.de, rht502@york.ac.uk
  • Received by editor(s): March 24, 2008
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: August 12, 2008
  • Published electronically: March 4, 2010
  • © Copyright 2010 American Mathematical Society
    The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), 4283-4311
  • MSC (2000): Primary 20G15, 14L24
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-10-04901-9
  • MathSciNet review: 2608407