Virtual resolutions of monomial ideals on toric varieties
By Jay Yang
Abstract
We use cellular resolutions of monomial ideals to prove an analog of Hilbert’s syzygy theorem for virtual resolutions of monomial ideals on smooth toric varieties.
1. Introduction
The theory of monomial ideals has provided a rich field of study for commutative algebra. These results rely on two fundamental features, one is that monomial ideals have combinatorial features that allow many invariants to be computed effectively, and second, the reduction to the initial ideal preserves or bounds these invariants. Thus many of the problems of commutative algebra can be reduced to, or at least bounded by the case of monomial ideals. Of particular interest to us is the observation that the betti numbers of an ideal are bounded above by the betti numbers of its initial ideal, in particular the results of Bigatti–Hulett–Pardue Reference Big93Reference Hul93Reference Par96.
The theory of virtual resolutions as described in Reference BES20 by Berkesch, Erman, and Smith, provides an alternative description of a free resolution in the case of subvarieties of products of projective spaces or more generally, smooth toric varieties.
Their original paper provides the following analogy to Hilbert’s syzygy theorem which we attempt to generalize to the case of virtual resolutions on toric varieties. For $\mathbf{n}\in \mathbb{N}^s$ define $\mathbb{P}^{\mathbf{n}}=\mathbb{P}^{n_1}\times \cdots \times \mathbb{P}^{n_s}$.
Given this, a natural question, stated as Question 7.5 in Reference BES20 but phrased here as a conjecture, is to ask whether such a statement is true for arbitrary smooth toric varieties.
The proof of the previous proposition uses Beilinson’s resolution of the diagonal, and is not immediately amenable to generalization to the toric case. Instead, we use the fact that a free resolution of $S/J$ is a virtual resolution of $S/I$ if $I=J:B^{\infty }$. With this in mind, we now state the main theorem of this paper.
The proof of this theorem is loosely inspired instead by Theorem 5.1 in Reference BES20.
As in the above theorem, it will turn out that the specific case that is of concern to us is when the virtual resolution is in fact a free resolution, but of a different ideal. This ideal will be constructed by starting with the original ideal intersected with a certain power of the irrelevant ideal, in this case the bracket power. Unfortunately as we will see in Lemma 4.1, this only gets us to $\operatorname {pdim}S/J\leq n+1$. Fortunately, there will be a reduction step that allows us to modify this to a new monomial ideal, with $\operatorname {pdim}S/J\leq n$.
The eventual goal is to have some degeneration theory to reduce Conjecture 1.1 to Theorem 1.2. In particular, it would suffice to have an analogue of the following result.
Even in the absence of such a theorem, Theorem 1.2 still provides support for Conjecture 1.1. However, significant work remains to prove the conjecture.
2. Notations and conventions
For the most part, we use standard notation for fans and cones. However, for the purposes of this paper, we will regard a cone as the set of extremal rays. Then as is standard, a fan $\Sigma$ is a finite collection of strongly convex rational polyhedral cones such that every face of a cone in $\Sigma$ is in $\Sigma$ and the intersection of any two cones in $\Sigma$ is a face of both cones. The set $\Sigma (n)$ is the set of $n$-dimensional cones. For a ray $\tau$, we denote the corresponding variable in the Cox ring by $x_{\tau }\in \mathbf{k}[\Sigma ]$. Similarly, for a collection of rays $\sigma$ let $x_{\sigma }\coloneq \prod _{\tau \in \sigma }x_{\tau }$ and $x_{\widehat{\sigma }}\coloneq \prod _{\tau \notin \sigma }x_{\tau }$.
Finally, for cells $F$,$G$ in a cell complex, we will use $F\prec G$ to denote that $F$ is a face of $G$.
3. Cellular resolutions
Our main tool in this paper will be cellular resolutions. The underlying concepts for cellular resolutions were first described in the case of simplicial complexes by Bayer, Peeva, and Sturmfels in their paper Monomial Resolutions Reference BPS98. This was later generalized to cell complexes by Bayer and Sturmfels in Reference BS98. We however will need a slight generalization, which itself is a special case of a generalization described by Ezra Miller in Reference Mil09, where we allow for the associated cell complex to be labeled by monomial ideals.
Then as with cellular resolutions with monomial labels, Lemma 3.2 implies that with an appropriate acyclicity condition, there exists a resolution of the ideal generated by the vertex labels.
So far, the construction has exactly mirrored the usual cellular resolution for monomial ideals. But one important difference is that there is no directly analogous minimality result. In the classical case, so long as no cell has the same label as one of its faces, the resulting resolution will be minimal. Since our complex is not a free resolution, to discuss minimality we must first pass to the total complex, but the resulting resolution will rarely be minimal.
4. Short virtual resolutions via bracket powers
The second component of our technique is an observation that intersecting monomial ideals with a bracket power of the irrelevant ideal leads to simpler resolutions. The bracket power of an ideal denoted $I^{[k]}$ is given by the ideal generated by the image of $I$ under the ring homomorphism given by $x_i\mapsto x_i^{k}$. Conveniently, for monomial ideals this is simply given by the formula $\left<m_1,\ldots ,m_s\right>^{[k]}=\left<m_1^k,\ldots ,m_s^k\right>$.
This result is similar in flavor to results of Mayes-Tang Reference MT19 and Whieldon Reference Whi14, which describe the stabilization of the shapes and decompositions of the betti table of the usual power of an ideal.
5. A shorter resolution
While the resolution constructed in Section 4 is shorter than the minimal free resolution in general, it is not as short as the minimal resolutions of ideals on projective space or the short virtual resolutions on products of $\mathbb{P}^n$ given by Reference BES20. We can however make the following observation.
This $(n+1)$-th betti number corresponds to the single top dimensional cell of the cell complex $\Delta$. So to reduce the length of the resolution, we will try to find a cellular resolution given by a cell complex of one dimension lower. As part of this, we will need to combine the labels on the previous cell complexes to give labels on the new cell complex.
For this let us first define the new cell complex on which we will provide labels.
The notation above does not mention the ray $\tau$, because while the choice of the ray $\tau$ affects the ideal and thus virtual resolution that this section constructs, the choice does not affect the conclusions of this paper.
Now for each $[\sigma ]\in \widetilde{\Delta }$ we will define a label. To do this, for each $[\sigma ]\in \widetilde{\Delta }$ we will define a subset of the set of cones $S(\sigma )$ as the set of cones whose defining rays are a subset of $\sigma \cup \left\{\tau \right\}$.
Now as before, we must show that these labels satisfy the appropriate conditions to give us a resolution of the correct length. We start by showing that the labels respect intersection of cones. An immediate consequence of this will be that for cells $[\sigma ]\prec [\sigma ']$ we have $J_{\sigma '}\subset J_{\sigma }$
At this point we move back to Theorem 1.2, and combine the results of the previous lemmas to show that $\widetilde{\Delta }$ gives a virtual resolution of $S/I$.
Remark 5.10.
The procedure in the proof depends on the ability to construct a correspondence between the cells of $\widetilde{\Delta }$ and $\Delta$. and as such, we cannot repeat the procedure to give even shorter resolutions.
Example 5.11.
Continuing from Example 4.4, we can view the process in the proof of Theorem 1.2 as “collapsing” the labeled cell complex from the example. The information from the cells that are removed from the complex are in some sense spread across the remaining cells. In this example we use the ray corresponding to $x_0$ for $\tau$. Thus the vertices that remain in $\widetilde{\Delta }$ correspond to the cones $\left\{x_1,x_2,x_4\right\}$,$\left\{x_1,x_3,x_4\right\}$, and $\left\{x_2,x_3,x_4\right\}$. This yields the following labeled cell complex:
$$\begin{equation*} \vcenter{\img[][176pt][89pt][{\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1} \setlength{\unitlength}{1.0pt} \begin{tikzpicture} \coordinate(w1) at (-1,1); \coordinate(w2) at (1,0); \coordinate(w3) at (-1,-1); \node[right] at (w2){$x_2^6\cdot\left<{x}_{3},{x}_{1}^{4} x_4,{x}_{1}^{5}\right>$}; \node[below] at (w3){$x_3^6\cdot\left<{x}_{2},{x}_{1}^4x_4,{x}_{1}^{5}\right>$}; \node[above] at (w1){$x_1^6\cdot\left<{x}_{2} {x}_{3},{x}_{2}^{2},x_0^{2},{x}_{3}^{3} \right> $}; \draw(w1)--(w2)--(w3)--cycle; \end{tikzpicture}}]{Images/img485388afc18a96ed4193c428029ddf5e.svg}} \end{equation*}$$
Furthermore the ideals $J_{1}\cap J_{2},J_{1}\cap J_{2},J_{1}\cap J_{2},J_{1}\cap J_{2}\cap J_{3}$ are all principal and thus free of rank $1$. Then the resulting free resolution from the total complex of the cellular resolution given by the above diagram is
$$\begin{equation*} 0\rightarrow S^{5}\rightarrow S^{14}\rightarrow S^{10}\rightarrow J. \end{equation*}$$
Thus as desired $\operatorname {pdim}S/J \leq 3$, and so $\operatorname {vpdim}S/J\leq \dim \Sigma$. In this instance the resolution this procedure yields happens to be a minimal free resolution of $J$.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank his Ph.D. advisor, Daniel Erman, and his postdoc mentor, Christine Berkesch, for their helpful conversations and advice. In particular the author would like to thank Christine for pointing out that one can use monomial ideal labels in a labeled cell complex. The author would also like to thank Mike Loper for conversations as the author worked out the details of the paper. Finally, the author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their comments and for their patience as the author rewrote a large part of the paper.
Given a smooth toric variety $X(\Sigma )$ with irrelevant ideal $B$, and a $B$-saturated ideal $I$,$\operatorname {vpdim}S/I \leq n$, where
$$\begin{equation*} \operatorname {vpdim}M = \min \left\{\operatorname {length}(F_{\bullet }) \mid F_{\bullet }\text{ a virtual resolution of } M\right\}. \end{equation*}$$
Theorem 1.2.
Let $I$ be a non-irrelevant $B$-saturated monomial ideal on a complete simplicial $n$-dimensional normal toric variety. Then there exists a monomial ideal $J$ with $I=J:B^{\infty }$ with $\operatorname {pdim}S/J\leq n$.
Lemma 3.2.
Fix a polynomial ring $S=\mathbf{k}[x_1,\ldots ,x_n]$ with the fine grading by $\mathbb{Z}^n$. Let $\Delta$ be a labeled cell complex with $\mathcal{E}(F,G)$ the attaching degree from the cell $G$ onto the cell $F$. Then for $\alpha \in \mathbb{Z}^n$ define the subcomplex of $\Delta$ whose cells are given by $\Delta _{\alpha }=\left\{F\, |\, (I_{F})_{\alpha }\neq 0\right\}$. Then the chain complex
If $\Delta$ is a labeled cell complex and $\widetilde{H}_i(\Delta _{\alpha },\mathbf{k})=0$ for all $\alpha$, then $C_{\Delta }$ is an complex with homology concentrated in homological degree $0$ and $H_0(C_{\Delta })=\sum _{\dim F = 0} I_{F}$.
Lemma 4.1.
If $I$ is a monomial ideal and $B$ is the irrelevant ideal of a $n$-dimensional complete normal toric variety, then $\operatorname {pdim}S/(I\cap B^{[k]})\leq n+1$.
This gives rise to the following labeled cell complex
$$\begin{equation*} \vcenter{\img[][229pt][116pt][{\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1} \setlength{\unitlength}{1.0pt} \begin{tikzpicture} \coordinate(o) at (0,0,0); \coordinate(x0) at (0,1,0); \coordinate(x1) at (0.7071,0,0.7071); \coordinate(x2) at (-1,0,0); \coordinate(x3) at (0,0,-1); \coordinate(x4) at (0,-1,0); \coordinate(v1) at (-1,1); \coordinate(v2) at (1,1); \coordinate(v3) at (0,1.5); \coordinate(v4) at (-1,-1); \coordinate(v5) at (1,-1); \coordinate(v6) at (0,-1.5); \node[left] at (v1) {$x_3^6x_4^6\cdot\left<x_2,x_1^4\right>$}; \node[above] at (v3) {$x_1^6x_4^6\cdot\left<x_2x_3,x_2^2,x_0^2,x_3^3\right>$}; \node[right] at (v2) {$x_2^6x_4^6\cdot\left<x_3,x_1^4\right>$}; \node[left] at (v4) {$x_0^6x_3^6\cdot\left<x_2,x_1^4x_4,x_1^5\right>$}; \node[below] at (v6) {$x_0^6x_1^6\cdot\left<1\right>$}; \node[right] at (v5) {$x_0^6x_2^6\cdot\left<x_3,x_1^4x_4,x_1^5\right>$}; \draw(v1)--(v2)--(v3)--cycle; \draw(v4)--(v5)--(v6)--cycle; \draw(v1)--(v4); \draw(v2)--(v5); \draw[dashed] (v3)--(v6); \end{tikzpicture}}]{Images/imga3442a24edfbb7054ca5a153bea07b31.svg}}. \end{equation*}$$
Dave Bayer, Irena Peeva, and Bernd Sturmfels, Monomial resolutions, Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998), no. 1-2, 31–46, DOI 10.4310/MRL.1998.v5.n1.a3. MR1618363, Show rawAMSref\bib{monomial-res}{article}{
author={Bayer, Dave},
author={Peeva, Irena},
author={Sturmfels, Bernd},
title={Monomial resolutions},
journal={Math. Res. Lett.},
volume={5},
date={1998},
number={1-2},
pages={31--46},
issn={1073-2780},
review={\MR {1618363}},
doi={10.4310/MRL.1998.v5.n1.a3},
}
Reference [BS98]
Dave Bayer and Bernd Sturmfels, Cellular resolutions of monomial modules, J. Reine Angew. Math. 502 (1998), 123–140, DOI 10.1515/crll.1998.083. MR1647559, Show rawAMSref\bib{cellular-res}{article}{
author={Bayer, Dave},
author={Sturmfels, Bernd},
title={Cellular resolutions of monomial modules},
journal={J. Reine Angew. Math.},
volume={502},
date={1998},
pages={123--140},
issn={0075-4102},
review={\MR {1647559}},
doi={10.1515/crll.1998.083},
}
Reference [Ber11]
Christine Berkesch, The rank of a hypergeometric system, Compos. Math. 147 (2011), no. 1, 284–318, DOI 10.1112/S0010437X10004811. MR2771133, Show rawAMSref\bib{cb-hypergeometric}{article}{
author={Berkesch, Christine},
title={The rank of a hypergeometric system},
journal={Compos. Math.},
volume={147},
date={2011},
number={1},
pages={284--318},
issn={0010-437X},
review={\MR {2771133}},
doi={10.1112/S0010437X10004811},
}
Reference [BES20]
Christine Berkesch, Daniel Erman, and Gregory G. Smith, Virtual resolutions for a product of projective spaces, Algebr. Geom. 7 (2020), no. 4, 460–481, DOI 10.14231/ag-2020-013. MR4156411, Show rawAMSref\bib{virtual-res}{article}{
author={Berkesch, Christine},
author={Erman, Daniel},
author={Smith, Gregory G.},
title={Virtual resolutions for a product of projective spaces},
journal={Algebr. Geom.},
volume={7},
date={2020},
number={4},
pages={460--481},
issn={2313-1691},
review={\MR {4156411}},
doi={10.14231/ag-2020-013},
}
Reference [Big93]
Anna Maria Bigatti, Upper bounds for the Betti numbers of a given Hilbert function, Comm. Algebra 21 (1993), no. 7, 2317–2334, DOI 10.1080/00927879308824679. MR1218500, Show rawAMSref\bib{bigatti}{article}{
author={Bigatti, Anna Maria},
title={Upper bounds for the Betti numbers of a given Hilbert function},
journal={Comm. Algebra},
volume={21},
date={1993},
number={7},
pages={2317--2334},
issn={0092-7872},
review={\MR {1218500}},
doi={10.1080/00927879308824679},
}
Reference [Hat02]
Allen Hatcher, Algebraic topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. MR1867354, Show rawAMSref\bib{hatcher}{book}{
author={Hatcher, Allen},
title={Algebraic topology},
publisher={Cambridge University Press, Cambridge},
date={2002},
pages={xii+544},
isbn={0-521-79160-X},
isbn={0-521-79540-0},
review={\MR {1867354}},
}
Reference [Hul93]
Heather Ann Hulett, Maximum Betti numbers for a given Hilbert function, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1993. Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. MR2690379, Show rawAMSref\bib{hulett}{book}{
author={Hulett, Heather Ann},
title={Maximum Betti numbers for a given Hilbert function},
note={Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign},
publisher={ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI},
date={1993},
pages={60},
review={\MR {2690379}},
}
Reference [MT19]
Sarah Mayes-Tang, Stabilization of Boij-Söderberg decompositions of ideal powers, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223 (2019), no. 2, 571–579, DOI 10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.04.007. MR3850557, Show rawAMSref\bib{mayes-tang-stability}{article}{
author={Mayes-Tang, Sarah},
title={Stabilization of Boij-S\"{o}derberg decompositions of ideal powers},
journal={J. Pure Appl. Algebra},
volume={223},
date={2019},
number={2},
pages={571--579},
issn={0022-4049},
review={\MR {3850557}},
doi={10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.04.007},
}
Reference [Mil09]
Ezra Miller, Topological Cohen-Macaulay criteria for monomial ideals, Combinatorial aspects of commutative algebra, Contemp. Math., vol. 502, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009, pp. 137–155, DOI 10.1090/conm/502/09861. MR2583278, Show rawAMSref\bib{miller-cm}{article}{
author={Miller, Ezra},
title={Topological Cohen-Macaulay criteria for monomial ideals},
conference={ title={Combinatorial aspects of commutative algebra}, },
book={ series={Contemp. Math.}, volume={502}, publisher={Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI}, },
date={2009},
pages={137--155},
review={\MR {2583278}},
doi={10.1090/conm/502/09861},
}
Reference [MS05]
Ezra Miller and Bernd Sturmfels, Combinatorial commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 227, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005. MR2110098, Show rawAMSref\bib{combinatorial-ca}{book}{
author={Miller, Ezra},
author={Sturmfels, Bernd},
title={Combinatorial commutative algebra},
series={Graduate Texts in Mathematics},
volume={227},
publisher={Springer-Verlag, New York},
date={2005},
pages={xiv+417},
isbn={0-387-22356-8},
review={\MR {2110098}},
}
Reference [Par96]
Keith Pardue, Deformation classes of graded modules and maximal Betti numbers, Illinois J. Math. 40 (1996), no. 4, 564–585. MR1415019, Show rawAMSref\bib{pardue}{article}{
author={Pardue, Keith},
title={Deformation classes of graded modules and maximal Betti numbers},
journal={Illinois J. Math.},
volume={40},
date={1996},
number={4},
pages={564--585},
issn={0019-2082},
review={\MR {1415019}},
}
Reference [Whi14]
Gwyneth Whieldon, Stabilization of Betti tables, J. Commut. Algebra 6 (2014), no. 1, 113–126, DOI 10.1216/JCA-2014-6-1-113. MR3215565, Show rawAMSref\bib{whieldon-stability}{article}{
author={Whieldon, Gwyneth},
title={Stabilization of Betti tables},
journal={J. Commut. Algebra},
volume={6},
date={2014},
number={1},
pages={113--126},
issn={1939-0807},
review={\MR {3215565}},
doi={10.1216/JCA-2014-6-1-113},
}
Show rawAMSref\bib{4215648}{article}{
author={Yang, Jay},
title={Virtual resolutions of monomial ideals on toric varieties},
journal={Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B},
volume={8},
number={9},
date={2021},
pages={100-111},
issn={2330-1511},
review={4215648},
doi={10.1090/bproc/72},
}
Settings
Change font size
Resize article panel
Enable equation enrichment
(Not available in this browser)
Note. To explore an equation, focus it (e.g., by clicking on it) and use the arrow keys to navigate its structure. Screenreader users should be advised that enabling speech synthesis will lead to duplicate aural rendering.