Stability phenomena for resonance arrangements

By Nicholas Proudfoot and Eric Ramos

Abstract

We prove that the graded pieces of the Orlik–Solomon algebras or Cordovil algebras of resonance arrangements form a finitely generated -module, thus obtaining information about the growth of their dimensions and restrictions on the irreducible representations of symmetric groups that they contain.

1. Introduction

Let be the collection of all hyperplanes in that are perpendicular to some nonzero vector with entries in the set . This hyperplane arrangement is called the resonance arrangement of rank . The resonance arrangement has connections to algebraic geometry, representation theory, geometric topology, mathematical physics, and economics; for a survey of these connections, see Reference 4, Section 1. Of particular interest is the set of chambers of . Amazingly, despite the simplicity of the definition, no formula for the number of chambers as a function of is known. A more refined invariant of is its characteristic polynomial, whose coefficients (after taking absolute values) have sum equal to the number of chambers. Kühne has made some progress toward understanding the coefficient of in the characteristic polynomial as a function of with fixed. Our purpose is to shed a new light on Kühne’s result, to generalize it to a wider class of arrangements, and to study the action of the symmetric group on various algebraic invariants of these arrangements.

Let be any finite set, and let be the collection of hyperplanes that are perpendicular to a nonzero vector with entries in . If , is the resonance arrangement. If , it is the threshold arrangement, which is studied in Reference 3. For each positive integer , let denote the set of -tuples of vectors in such that no nontrivial⁠Footnote1 linear combination of all vectors with coefficients in is equal to zero. The cohomology ring of is generated in degree Reference 2, Corollary 5.6. If is even, the presentation of this ring in Reference 2 coincides with that of the Orlik–Solomon algebra of (with all degrees multiplied by ) Reference 6. If is odd and greater than , then it coincides with that of the Cordovil algebra of (with all degrees multiplied by ) Reference 1; see also Reference 5, Example 5.8.⁠Footnote2 In particular, for any , , and , the dimension is equal to times the coefficient of in the characteristic polynomial of .

1

Nontrivial means that, if , we do not allow all coefficients to be 0.

2

For odd, the presentation in Reference 2 incorrectly omits the relations that each of the generators squares to zero.

These vector spaces carry more information than just their dimension; they also carry actions of the symmetric group , which acts by permuting the vectors. These representations are isomorphic for all even and for all odd , but the and cases are genuinely different. The total cohomology with all degrees combined is isomorphic as a representation of to , which is the permutation representation with basis indexed by the chambers of Reference 5, Theorem 1.4(b).

For fixed , , and , we will define in the next section a contravariant module over the category of finite sets with surjections that takes the set to .

Theorem 1.1.

The module is finitely generated in degrees .

Combining Theorem 1.1 with Reference 7, Theorem 4.1, we obtain the following numerical results:⁠Footnote3

3

The deepest of these statements, namely the fact that the dimension generating function for a finitely generated -module is rational with prescribed poles, is due to Sam and Snowden Reference 8, Corollary 8.1.4.

Corollary 1.2.

Fix a finite set and a pair of integers and .

(1)

The generating function

is a rational function with poles contained in the set , with at worst a simple pole at . Equivalently, there exist polynomials such that, for sufficiently large,

and the last polynomial is a constant polynomial.

(2)

For any partition of , let denote the irreducible representation of indexed by . If , then has at most rows.

(3)

For any partition with , let be the padded partition of obtained from by adding a row of length . For any , the function

is bounded above by a polynomial in . In particular, if is the empty partition, this says that the multiplicity of the trivial representation in is bounded above by a polynomial in .

Remark 1.3.

A stronger version of item (1) above for the resonance arrangement appears in Reference 4, Theorem 1.4. Kühne proves that the polynomials are all constant (i.e. that all poles of are simple), obtains bounds on their sizes, and shows that the equality holds for all , not just sufficiently large (i.e. that the limit as goes to of is zero). It should be possible to categorify Kühne’s theorem by proving that the restriction of to the category of ordered surjections Reference 8 is isomorphic to a direct sum of shifts of principal projectives, with summands indexed by Kühne’s functional prototypes. The cost of working with ordered surjections would be that we would lose all information about the action of the symmetric group.

2. The proof

Let denote the category whose objects are nonempty finite sets and whose morphisms are surjective maps. An -module over is a contravariant functor from to the category of rational vector spaces. For each finite set , we have the principal projective module , which sends a finite set to the vector space with basis , with morphisms defined on basis elements by composition. An -module is said to be finitely generated if it is a quotient of a finite sum of principal projectives, and it is said to be finitely generated in degrees if the sets can all be taken to have cardinality less than or equal to . This is equivalent to saying that, for all , the vector space finite dimensional and is spanned by the images of the pullbacks along various maps , where has cardinality less than or equal to .

Lemma 2.1.

Suppose that is finitely generated in degrees and is finitely generated in degrees . Then the pointwise tensor product is finitely generated in degrees .

Proof.

We immediately reduce to the case where and . For any , let denote the corresponding basis element of . Then has basis

Given the pair of surjections , let denote the image of , let , and let and denote the coordinate projections. It is clear that we have . Since the cardinality of is at most , this completes the proof.

Fix a positive integer and a finite set . To any finite set , we associated the space of -tuples of vectors in such that any nontrivial linear combination of the vectors with coefficients in is nonzero. Given a surjection , we obtain a map

by adding the vectors in each fiber of . These maps define a functor from to the category of topological spaces. By taking rational cohomology in degree , we obtain an -module . We prove the following theorem, which implies the three statements in the introduction.

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

As noted above, the cohomology of is generated as an algebra in degree , hence is a quotient of . By Lemma 2.1, this means that it is sufficient to prove that is finitely generated in degrees . For any finite set , the vector space has a generating set indexed by nonzero elements of Reference 2, Corollary 5.6 (these generators form a basis unless two nonzero elements of are proportional, in which case the corresponding generators are equal). For any nonzero , let be the corresponding generator. Concretely, if we take to be the standard generator, then is equal to the pullback of along the map

that sends an -tuple of vectors to its linear combination with coefficients determined by . Given a surjection , we have , and therefore

Since every element of may be pulled back from a subset of cardinality at most , is generated in degrees .

Remark 2.2.

Our construction also works if we replace with an arbitrary field and we take to be a finite subset of . We define the arrangement in as above, we denote its complement by , and we take to be the étale cohomology group for some prime not equal to the characteristic of , which is isomorphic to the degree part of the Orlik–Solomon algebra of . This is an -module over , and the same argument shows that it is finitely generated in degrees .

An interesting special case is where is a finite field and , so that our arrangement is the collection of all hyperplanes in . This arrangement has characteristic polynomial , and therefore the Betti number is equal to the evaluation of the elementary symmetric polynomial at the values . This implies that the Hilbert series of our module is

which has simple poles at for . The projectivization of is a Deligne–Lusztig variety for the group .

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Lou Billera for telling them about the arrangement and about Kühne’s work.

Mathematical Fragments

Theorem 1.1.

The module is finitely generated in degrees .

Lemma 2.1.

Suppose that is finitely generated in degrees and is finitely generated in degrees . Then the pointwise tensor product is finitely generated in degrees .

References

Reference [1]
R. Cordovil, A commutative algebra for oriented matroids: Geometric combinatorics (San Francisco, CA/Davis, CA, 2000), Discrete Comput. Geom. 27 (2002), no. 1, 73–84, DOI 10.1007/s00454-001-0053-8. MR1871690,
Show rawAMSref \bib{Co}{article}{ author={Cordovil, R.}, title={A commutative algebra for oriented matroids}, subtitle={Geometric combinatorics (San Francisco, CA/Davis, CA, 2000)}, journal={Discrete Comput. Geom.}, volume={27}, date={2002}, number={1}, pages={73--84}, issn={0179-5376}, review={\MR {1871690}}, doi={10.1007/s00454-001-0053-8}, }
Reference [2]
Mark de Longueville and Carsten A. Schultz, The cohomology rings of complements of subspace arrangements, Math. Ann. 319 (2001), no. 4, 625–646, DOI 10.1007/PL00004452. MR1825401,
Show rawAMSref \bib{dLS}{article}{ author={de Longueville, Mark}, author={Schultz, Carsten A.}, title={The cohomology rings of complements of subspace arrangements}, journal={Math. Ann.}, volume={319}, date={2001}, number={4}, pages={625--646}, issn={0025-5831}, review={\MR {1825401}}, doi={10.1007/PL00004452}, }
Reference [3]
Samuel C. Gutekunst, Karola Mészáros, and T. Kyle Petersen, Root cones and the resonance arrangement, Electron. J. Combin. 28 (2021), no. 1, Paper No. 1.12, 39, DOI 10.37236/8759. MR4245245,
Show rawAMSref \bib{GMP}{article}{ author={Gutekunst, Samuel C.}, author={M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros, Karola}, author={Petersen, T. Kyle}, title={Root cones and the resonance arrangement}, journal={Electron. J. Combin.}, volume={28}, date={2021}, number={1}, pages={Paper No. 1.12, 39}, review={\MR {4245245}}, doi={10.37236/8759}, }
Reference [4]
Lucas Kühne, The universality of the resonance arrangement and its Betti numbers, arXiv:2008.10553.
Reference [5]
Daniel Moseley, Equivariant cohomology and the Varchenko-Gelfand filtration, J. Algebra 472 (2017), 95–114, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.10.010. MR3584871,
Show rawAMSref \bib{Moseley}{article}{ author={Moseley, Daniel}, title={Equivariant cohomology and the Varchenko-Gelfand filtration}, journal={J. Algebra}, volume={472}, date={2017}, pages={95--114}, issn={0021-8693}, review={\MR {3584871}}, doi={10.1016/j.jalgebra.2016.10.010}, }
Reference [6]
Peter Orlik and Louis Solomon, Combinatorics and topology of complements of hyperplanes, Invent. Math. 56 (1980), no. 2, 167–189, DOI 10.1007/BF01392549. MR558866,
Show rawAMSref \bib{OS}{article}{ author={Orlik, Peter}, author={Solomon, Louis}, title={Combinatorics and topology of complements of hyperplanes}, journal={Invent. Math.}, volume={56}, date={1980}, number={2}, pages={167--189}, issn={0020-9910}, review={\MR {558866}}, doi={10.1007/BF01392549}, }
Reference [7]
Nicholas Proudfoot and Ben Young, Configuration spaces, -modules, and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials of braid matroids, New York J. Math. 23 (2017), 813–832. MR3690232,
Show rawAMSref \bib{fs-braid}{article}{ author={Proudfoot, Nicholas}, author={Young, Ben}, title={Configuration spaces, $\mathrm {FS}^{\mathrm {op}}$-modules, and Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials of braid matroids}, journal={New York J. Math.}, volume={23}, date={2017}, pages={813--832}, review={\MR {3690232}}, }
Reference [8]
Steven V. Sam and Andrew Snowden, Gröbner methods for representations of combinatorial categories, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (2017), no. 1, 159–203, DOI 10.1090/jams/859. MR3556290,
Show rawAMSref \bib{sam}{article}{ author={Sam, Steven V.}, author={Snowden, Andrew}, title={Gr\"{o}bner methods for representations of combinatorial categories}, journal={J. Amer. Math. Soc.}, volume={30}, date={2017}, number={1}, pages={159--203}, issn={0894-0347}, review={\MR {3556290}}, doi={10.1090/jams/859}, }

Article Information

MSC 2020
Primary: 14N20 (Configurations and arrangements of linear subspaces)
Author Information
Nicholas Proudfoot
Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403
njp@uoregon.edu
MathSciNet
Eric Ramos
Department of Mathematics, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine 04011
e.ramos@bowdoin.edu
MathSciNet
Additional Notes

The first author was supported in part by NSF grants DMS-1565036 and DMS-1954050. The second author was supported in part by NSF grant DMS-1704811.

Communicated by
Patricia L. Hersh
Journal Information
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Series B, Volume 8, Issue 18, ISSN 2330-1511, published by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.
Publication History
This article was received on , revised on , and published on .
Copyright Information
Copyright 2021 by the authors under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License (CC BY NC 3.0)
Article References
  • Permalink
  • Permalink (PDF)
  • DOI 10.1090/bproc/71
  • MathSciNet Review: 4278178
  • Show rawAMSref \bib{4278178}{article}{ author={Proudfoot, Nicholas}, author={Ramos, Eric}, title={Stability phenomena for resonance arrangements}, journal={Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B}, volume={8}, number={18}, date={2021}, pages={219-223}, issn={2330-1511}, review={4278178}, doi={10.1090/bproc/71}, }

Settings

Change font size
Resize article panel
Enable equation enrichment

Note. To explore an equation, focus it (e.g., by clicking on it) and use the arrow keys to navigate its structure. Screenreader users should be advised that enabling speech synthesis will lead to duplicate aural rendering.

For more information please visit the AMS MathViewer documentation.