A classical method for partition generating function is developed into a tool with wide applications. New expansions of well-known theorems are derived, and new results for partitions with $n$ copies of $n$ are presented.
1. Introduction
The object of this paper is to systematize a process in the theory of integer partition that really dates back to Euler. It is epitomized in the partition-theoretic interpretation of three classical identities:
A separable integer partition class (SIP), $\mathcal{P}$, with modulus $k$, is a subset of all the integer partitions satisfying the following:
There is a subset $\mathcal{B}\subset \mathcal{P}$($\mathcal{B}$ is called the basis of $\mathcal{P}$) such that for each integer $n\geq 1$, the number of elements of $\mathcal{B}$ with $n$ parts is finite and every element of $\mathcal{P}$ with $n$ parts is uniquely of the form
where $0<b_1\leq b_2 \leq \ldots \leq b_n$ is a partition in $\mathcal{B}$ and $0\leq \pi _1\leq \pi _2 \leq \ldots \leq \pi _n$ is a partition into $n$ nonnegative parts, whose only restriction is that each part is divisible by $k$. Furthermore, all partitions of the form Equation 1.5 are in $\mathcal{P}$.
As we will see in section 2, each of Equation 1.1, Equation 1.2, and Equation 1.3 can be developed from this point of view with modulus $k=1$. However. this setting allows a similar examination of the first Göllnitz-Gordon identity Reference 16 in section 3:
More surprising is an analysis of Schur’s 1926 partition theorem Reference 24 in section 4. It is interesting to note that this analysis leads naturally to full proofs of both Equation 1.6 and Schur’s theorem.
In section 5, we examine a new application. In section 6, we extend the concept of SIP classes to partitions with $n$ copies of $n$Reference 1. Section 7 extends SIP classes to overpartitions. In the final section, we discuss open questions and note that the idea first arose in dynamical systems concerning billiard trajectories Reference 13.
2. General theory and classical identities
The infinite series in each of Equation 1.1, Equation 1.2, and Equation 1.3 fit neatly into the SIP program with modulus $k=1$. We begin with Equation 1.1. In this case, we let $\mathcal{P}_\mathds{N}$ be the set of all integer partitions. Now for each $n$, there is only one element of $\mathcal{B}_\mathds{N}$ with $n$ parts, namely
Next we consider $\mathcal{P}_\mathcal{D}$, the integer partitions that have distinct parts. Here for each $n$ there is again exactly one partition in $\mathcal{B}_\mathcal{D}$ with $n$ parts, namely
Finally, if $\mathcal{P}_R$($R$ for Rogers and Ramanujan) is the set of integer partitions where the difference between parts is $\geq 2$, the only element of $\mathcal{B}_R$ with $n$ parts is
Perhaps the reason that this type of study has not gone farther is the fact that in each of the classical cases there was only one element of $\mathcal{B}$ with $n$ parts.
As we will see in the remaining sections, there are many SIP classes with a number of elements of $\mathcal{B}$ with $n$ parts. The real challenge in each instance will be to determine the generating function for $\mathcal{B}$. Obviously if we denote by $b_\mathcal{B}(n)$ the generating function for these elements of $\mathcal{B}$, then the generating function for all the partitions in $\mathcal{P}$ is given by
where $k$ is the modulus associated with $\mathcal{P}$. In the three cases just considered, we hardly need to think about $\mathcal{B}$ since in each case, there is only one element of $\mathcal{B}$ with $n$ parts.
So how does one determine $b_\mathcal{B}(n)$? The idea is to refine one’s consideration of $b_\mathcal{B}(n,h)$ where $b_\mathcal{B}(n,h)$ is the generating function for those elements of $\mathcal{B}$ with $n$ parts and largest part $h$. Clearly
In practice we shall obtain recurrences for the $b_\mathcal{B}(n,h)$. The recurrences will arise by noting the parts in the partitions in $\mathcal{B}$ can’t get too far apart. Namely if $h$ is too far from the next part then $k$ can be subtracted from $h$ yielding another partition in $\mathcal{B}$ and contradicting the uniqueness of the decomposition Equation 1.5.
The previous paragraph is vague because each individual SIP class provides different meaning for “too far from.”
Theorem 1 provides a large number of SIP classes and will facilitate the subsequent theorems in sections 3-5.
Let $\mathcal{P}_\mathcal{G}$ denote the set of all partitions in which the difference between parts is at least 2 and at least 4 between multiples of 2.
we see that the first class of partitions in Schur’s theorem may be replaced by partitions into distinct nonmultiples of 3.
Indeed, this revision of Schur may be refined as follows (an idea first effectively considered in Reference 2 and amplified in Reference 11):
Let $\mathcal{P}_{\mathcal{S}}$ denote the class of all partitions satisfying the difference conditions in Schur’s theorem.
In the remainder of this section, we shall first determine an explicit formula for the generating functions associated with $\mathcal{B}_{\mathcal{S}}$. Then we will apply Corollary 2 to prove the Refinement of Schur’s Theorem.
We shall conclude this section by proving the Refinement of Schur’s Theorem combining Corollary 2 with Theorem 8.
To make the final theorem of this section readable, we first prove Lemmas 9, 10, 11.
5. Glasgow Mod 8
H. Göllnitz Reference 16, Reference 17 provided four partition identities related to partitions whose parts are restricted to certain residue classes modulo 8. Two of these theorems were independently discovered by B. Gordon Reference 19, Reference 20 and have been given the name Göllnitz-Gordon, as mentioned previously.
Lesser known is the following theorem which first appeared in the Glasgow Mathematics Journal in 1967 Reference 4, p. 127:
We have chosen to consider this theorem owing to the fact that it has never appeared as a direct consequence of a series-product identity. Indeed, the relevant identity turns out to be
We shall first prove that Equation 5.1 is valid. We shall then prove that the left side of Equation 5.1 is an instance of Corollary 2.
6. Partitions with $n$ copies of $n$
The basic idea epitomized by Theorem 1 is actually applicable in a broader context. In this section we shall describe its application to partitions with “$n$ copies of $n$”Reference 1.
This subject considers partitions taken from the set $M$ of ordered pairs of positive integers with the second entry not exceeding the first entry. A partition with $n$ copies of $n$ of the positive integer $v$ is a finite collection of elements of $M$ wherein the first elements of the ordered pairs sum to $v$. For example, there are six partitions of $3$ with $n$ copies of $n$:
As was noted in Reference 1, there is a bijection between partitions with $n$ copies of $n$ and plane partitions.
Most important for our current considerations is the weighted difference between two elements of $M$. Namely, we define $((m_i-n_j))$, the weighted difference of $m_i$ and $n_j$, as follows:
The main point of Reference 1 was to prove the following two results.
These two theorems are special cases of a general theorem proved in Reference 1, Th. 3, p. 42. The proofs relied on bijection between the partitions in question and the results which provide several Rogers-Ramanujan type theorems concerning partitions with specified hook differences.
Our object here is to reveal a completely different path to proof by using an adaptation of Theorem 1.
Let $\beta _r(m;q)$ denote the generating function for partitions with $n$ copies of $n$ where the weighted difference between successive parts (written in lexicographic ascending order, i.e. $m_i>n_j$ if $m>n$ or $m=n$ and $i>j$) is exactly $r$, there are exactly $m$ parts, and the smallest part is of the form $i_i$.
As we will see, Theorems 20 and 21 follow from Theorem 22 plus Lemma 24 via two identities given in L. J. Slater’s compendium Reference 25, eqs (46) and (61):
The right hand side of Equation 6.4 is easily seen to be the generating function for $C(n)$, the number of partitions in which multiples of 7 are not repeated, all other parts are $\equiv \pm 2,\pm 3,\pm 4\pmod {14}$ and parts $\equiv \pm 3\pmod {14}$ appear in two colors. This observation together with Equation 6.4 establishes the following result.
We shall not require the full generality of Theorem 1 for our application of the SIP idea to partitions with $n$ copies of $n$. Indeed we only need something analogous to the three classical examples provided initially in section 2.
Thus we have established the analogous paradigm for $n$-copies of $n$ partitions that we considered for ordinary partitions.
The next step is to consider the generating function for the partitions
where $\bar{m}_i=i_i$ and all weighted differences between successive parts in ascending order equal $r$. Call this generating function $g_r(n,m,j)$ for such partitions where the number of parts is $n$ and the largest part is $m_j$.
Namely these are the partitions of $n$ wherein each part size can have (or not) one summand overlined. Thus the 8 overpartitions of 3 are $3,\bar{3},2+1,\bar{2}+1,2+\bar{1},\bar{2}+\bar{1},1+1+1$, and $1+1+\bar{1}$.
Among the most appealing theorems on overpartitions is Lovejoy’s extension of Schur’s theorem to overpartitions Reference 22.
Now the generating function for overpartitions in which no part is divisible by 3 is:
It is completely unclear how exactly the right-hand side of Equation 7.1 fits in with Lovejoy’s theorem. It turns out that Equation 7.1 naturally fits into overpartitions with $n$ copies of $n$. Here the same principle as before applies where now only one instance of $n_j\nobreakspace (1\le j\le n)$ may be overlined in any partition. The generating function is:
Thus the 16 overpartitions of 3 using $n$ copies of $n$ are $3_3,\bar{3}_3, 3_2, \bar{3}_2, 3_1,\bar{3}_1,2_2+1_1,\bar{2}_2+1_1,2_2+\bar{1}_1,\bar{2}_2+\bar{1}_1,1_1+1_1+1_1+1_1,1_1+1_1+1_1+\bar{1}_1$.
As an example, when $m=4,J(4)=10$, and the overpartitions in question are $4,\bar{4},2+2,2+\bar{2},2+1,2+\bar{1},\bar{2}+1,\bar{2}+\bar{1},1+1+1+1,1+1+1+\bar{1}.\nobreakspace L(4)=10$, and the overpartitions with $n$ copies of $n$ are $4_4,\bar{4}_4,4_3,\bar{4}_3,4_2,\bar{4}_2,4_1,\bar{4}_1,3_1+1_1,3_1+\bar{1}_1$.
8. Partitions with $n$ copies of $n$ and even subscripts
It may at first appear rather artificial to restrict ourselves to only those $n_j$ with $j$ even $(1<j\le n)$. However, this restriction leads to a new interpretation of one of the more striking results in L. J. Slater’s compendium Reference 25, p. 161, eq. (86)
The right hand side of Equation 8.1 is clearly the generating function for $G(n)$, the number of partitions of $n$ into parts $\equiv \pm 2,\pm 3,\pm 4,\pm 5\pmod {16}$. On the other hand, noting that
into nondecreasing parts with $b_3-b_2\ge 2,b_3-b_2\ge 2,b_5-b_4\ge 2,b_7-b_6\ge 2,\dots$ (cf. Reference 19).
The reason that we renew our study of Equation 8.1 is that it fits perfectly into the theme of the last two sections.
As an example, $G(10)=7$ where the relevant partitions are $5+5,5+3+2,4+4+2,4+3+3,4+2+2+2,3+3+2+2,2+2+2+2+2.$$H(10)=7$ where the relevant partitions are $10_{10},10_8,10_6,10_4,10_2,8_2+2_2,8_4+2_2$. Note that $7_2+3_2$ is disallowed because $((7_2-3_2))=0$ with both 7 and 3 odd.
9. Conclusion
There are several points to be made in summary.
First, we have chosen a sampling of possible applications of this method to make clear its widespread utility. Thus there are many instances of Theorem 1 that have yet to be considered. We have treated only a few of these.
Second, there are other examples of SIP classes. Indeed, the inspiration for this paper arose from Reference 13. The SIP class in Reference 13 is the set of integer partitions in which the parts are distinct, the smallest is even, and there are no consecutive odd parts. This SIP class is not an instance of Theorem 1. Consequently, it is surely valuable to explore SIPs not included in Theorem 1.
Finally, there are other theorems that cry out for an analogous theory. For example, the mod 7 instance of the generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities given in Reference 7 may be stated:
There are several interpretations of the left hand side of Equation 6.1Reference 8, Reference 9, Reference 18; however none seems to lend itself to an SIP-style interpretation. If such an interpretation could be found, this would open many further possibilities.
Acknowledgment
I wish to thank the referee whose care and insights greatly increased the readability of this work.
A. K. Agarwal and George E. Andrews, Rogers-Ramanujan identities for partitions with “$n$ copies of $n$”, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 45 (1987), no. 1, 40–49, DOI 10.1016/0097-3165(87)90045-8. MR883892, Show rawAMSref\bib{1}{article}{
author={Agarwal, A. K.},
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={Rogers-Ramanujan identities for partitions with ``$n$ copies of $n$''},
journal={J. Combin. Theory Ser. A},
volume={45},
date={1987},
number={1},
pages={40--49},
issn={0097-3165},
review={\MR {883892}},
doi={10.1016/0097-3165(87)90045-8},
}
Reference [2]
Krishnaswami Alladi and Basil Gordon, Schur’s partition theorem, companions, refinements and generalizations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (1995), no. 5, 1591–1608, DOI 10.2307/2154961. MR1297520, Show rawAMSref\bib{2}{article}{
author={Alladi, Krishnaswami},
author={Gordon, Basil},
title={Schur's partition theorem, companions, refinements and generalizations},
journal={Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={347},
date={1995},
number={5},
pages={1591--1608},
issn={0002-9947},
review={\MR {1297520}},
doi={10.2307/2154961},
}
Reference [3]
George E. Andrews, A generalization of the Göllnitz-Gordon partition theorems, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), 945–952, DOI 10.2307/2035143. MR219497, Show rawAMSref\bib{4}{article}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={A generalization of the G\"{o}llnitz-Gordon partition theorems},
journal={Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={18},
date={1967},
pages={945--952},
issn={0002-9939},
review={\MR {219497}},
doi={10.2307/2035143},
}
Reference [4]
George E. Andrews, On Schur’s second partition theorem, Glasgow Math. J. 8 (1967), 127–132, DOI 10.1017/S0017089500000197. MR220692, Show rawAMSref\bib{3}{article}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={On Schur's second partition theorem},
journal={Glasgow Math. J.},
volume={8},
date={1967},
pages={127--132},
issn={0017-0895},
review={\MR {220692}},
doi={10.1017/S0017089500000197},
}
Reference [5]
George E. Andrews, Note on a partition theorem, Glasgow Math. J. 11 (1970), 108–109, DOI 10.1017/S0017089500000938. MR269623, Show rawAMSref\bib{5}{article}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={Note on a partition theorem},
journal={Glasgow Math. J.},
volume={11},
date={1970},
pages={108--109},
issn={0017-0895},
review={\MR {269623}},
doi={10.1017/S0017089500000938},
}
Reference [6]
George E. Andrews, Partition identities, Advances in Math. 9 (1972), 10–51, DOI 10.1016/0001-8708(72)90028-X. MR306105, Show rawAMSref\bib{6}{article}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={Partition identities},
journal={Advances in Math.},
volume={9},
date={1972},
pages={10--51},
issn={0001-8708},
review={\MR {306105}},
doi={10.1016/0001-8708(72)90028-X},
}
Reference [7]
George E. Andrews, An analytic generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities for odd moduli, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71 (1974), 4082–4085, DOI 10.1073/pnas.71.10.4082. MR351985, Show rawAMSref\bib{7}{article}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={An analytic generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities for odd moduli},
journal={Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.},
volume={71},
date={1974},
pages={4082--4085},
issn={0027-8424},
review={\MR {351985}},
doi={10.1073/pnas.71.10.4082},
}
Reference [8]
George E. Andrews, On the Alder polynomials and a new generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 204 (1975), 40–64, DOI 10.2307/1997348. MR364083, Show rawAMSref\bib{8}{article}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={On the Alder polynomials and a new generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities},
journal={Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={204},
date={1975},
pages={40--64},
issn={0002-9947},
review={\MR {364083}},
doi={10.2307/1997348},
}
Reference [9]
George E. Andrews, Partitions and Durfee dissection, Amer. J. Math. 101 (1979), no. 3, 735–742, DOI 10.2307/2373804. MR533197, Show rawAMSref\bib{10}{article}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={Partitions and Durfee dissection},
journal={Amer. J. Math.},
volume={101},
date={1979},
number={3},
pages={735--742},
issn={0002-9327},
review={\MR {533197}},
doi={10.2307/2373804},
}
Reference [10]
George E. Andrews, The theory of partitions, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. Reprint of the 1976 original. MR1634067, Show rawAMSref\bib{9}{book}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={The theory of partitions},
series={Cambridge Mathematical Library},
note={Reprint of the 1976 original},
publisher={Cambridge University Press, Cambridge},
date={1998},
pages={xvi+255},
isbn={0-521-63766-X},
review={\MR {1634067}},
}
Reference [11]
George E. Andrews, A refinement of the Alladi-Schur theorem, Lattice path combinatorics and applications, Dev. Math., vol. 58, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 71–77. MR3930452, Show rawAMSref\bib{11}{article}{
label={11},
author={Andrews, George E.},
title={A refinement of the Alladi-Schur theorem},
conference={ title={Lattice path combinatorics and applications}, },
book={ series={Dev. Math.}, volume={58}, publisher={Springer, Cham}, },
date={2019},
pages={71--77},
review={\MR {3930452}},
}
Reference [12]
George E. Andrews and Bruce C. Berndt, Ramanujan’s lost notebook. Part V, Springer, Cham, 2018, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-77834-1. MR3838409, Show rawAMSref\bib{13}{book}{
author={Andrews, George E.},
author={Berndt, Bruce C.},
title={Ramanujan's lost notebook. Part V},
publisher={Springer, Cham},
date={2018},
pages={xii+430},
isbn={978-3-319-77832-7},
isbn={978-3-319-77834-1},
review={\MR {3838409}},
doi={10.1007/978-3-319-77834-1},
}
Reference [13]
G. E. Andrews, V. Dragovich, and M. Radnovic, Combinatorics of periodic ellipsoidal billards, (to appear).
Reference [14]
Sylvie Corteel and Jeremy Lovejoy, Overpartitions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), no. 4, 1623–1635, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9947-03-03328-2. MR2034322, Show rawAMSref\bib{14}{article}{
author={Corteel, Sylvie},
author={Lovejoy, Jeremy},
title={Overpartitions},
journal={Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.},
volume={356},
date={2004},
number={4},
pages={1623--1635},
issn={0002-9947},
review={\MR {2034322}},
doi={10.1090/S0002-9947-03-03328-2},
}
Reference [15]
Nathan J. Fine, Basic hypergeometric series and applications, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 27, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1988. With a foreword by George E. Andrews, DOI 10.1090/surv/027. MR956465, Show rawAMSref\bib{15}{book}{
author={Fine, Nathan J.},
title={Basic hypergeometric series and applications},
series={Mathematical Surveys and Monographs},
volume={27},
note={With a foreword by George E. Andrews},
publisher={American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI},
date={1988},
pages={xvi+124},
isbn={0-8218-1524-5},
review={\MR {956465}},
doi={10.1090/surv/027},
}
Reference [16]
H. Göllnitz, Einfache partitionen, Diplomarbeit W.S., Göttingen, 1960.
Reference [17]
H. Göllnitz, Partitionen mit Differenzenbedingungen(German), J. Reine Angew. Math. 225 (1967), 154–190, DOI 10.1515/crll.1967.225.154. MR211973, Show rawAMSref\bib{17}{article}{
author={G\"{o}llnitz, H.},
title={Partitionen mit Differenzenbedingungen},
language={German},
journal={J. Reine Angew. Math.},
volume={225},
date={1967},
pages={154--190},
issn={0075-4102},
review={\MR {211973}},
doi={10.1515/crll.1967.225.154},
}
Reference [18]
Basil Gordon, A combinatorial generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities, Amer. J. Math. 83 (1961), 393–399, DOI 10.2307/2372962. MR123484, Show rawAMSref\bib{18}{article}{
author={Gordon, Basil},
title={A combinatorial generalization of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities},
journal={Amer. J. Math.},
volume={83},
date={1961},
pages={393--399},
issn={0002-9327},
review={\MR {123484}},
doi={10.2307/2372962},
}
Reference [19]
B. Gordon, Some Ramanujan-like continued fractions, Abstract of Short Communications, Stockholm, 1962, pp. 29–30, Inter. Congress of Math.
Reference [20]
Basil Gordon, Some continued fractions of the Rogers-Ramanujan type, Duke Math. J. 32 (1965), 741–748. MR184001, Show rawAMSref\bib{20}{article}{
author={Gordon, Basil},
title={Some continued fractions of the Rogers-Ramanujan type},
journal={Duke Math. J.},
volume={32},
date={1965},
pages={741--748},
issn={0012-7094},
review={\MR {184001}},
}
Reference [21]
G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright, An introduction to the theory of numbers, 5th ed., The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1979. MR568909, Show rawAMSref\bib{21}{book}{
author={Hardy, G. H.},
author={Wright, E. M.},
title={An introduction to the theory of numbers},
edition={5},
publisher={The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York},
date={1979},
pages={xvi+426},
isbn={0-19-853170-2},
isbn={0-19-853171-0},
review={\MR {568909}},
}
Reference [22]
Jeremy Lovejoy, A theorem on seven-colored overpartitions and its applications, Int. J. Number Theory 1 (2005), no. 2, 215–224, DOI 10.1142/S1793042105000157. MR2173381, Show rawAMSref\bib{22}{article}{
author={Lovejoy, Jeremy},
title={A theorem on seven-colored overpartitions and its applications},
journal={Int. J. Number Theory},
volume={1},
date={2005},
number={2},
pages={215--224},
issn={1793-0421},
review={\MR {2173381}},
doi={10.1142/S1793042105000157},
}
Reference [23]
Percy A. MacMahon, Combinatory analysis, Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1960. Two volumes (bound as one). MR0141605, Show rawAMSref\bib{23}{book}{
author={MacMahon, Percy A.},
title={Combinatory analysis},
note={Two volumes (bound as one)},
publisher={Chelsea Publishing Co., New York},
date={1960},
pages={xix+302+xix+340},
review={\MR {0141605}},
}
Reference [24]
I. Schur. Zur additiven Zahlentheorie, Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Vol II, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1973, Herausgegeben von Alfred Brauer und Hans Rohrbach.
Reference [25]
L. J. Slater, Further identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 54 (1952), 147–167, DOI 10.1112/plms/s2-54.2.147. MR49225, Show rawAMSref\bib{25}{article}{
label={25},
author={Slater, L. J.},
title={Further identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type},
journal={Proc. London Math. Soc. (2)},
volume={54},
date={1952},
pages={147--167},
issn={0024-6115},
review={\MR {49225}},
doi={10.1112/plms/s2-54.2.147},
}
Note. To explore an equation, focus it (e.g., by clicking on it) and use the arrow keys to navigate its structure. Screenreader users should be advised that enabling speech synthesis will lead to duplicate aural rendering.