The second largest prime divisor of an odd perfect number exceeds ten thousand
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Douglas E. Iannucci PDF
- Math. Comp. 68 (1999), 1749-1760 Request permission
Abstract:
Let $\sigma (n)$ denote the sum of positive divisors of the natural number $n$. Such a number is said to be perfect if $\sigma (n)=2n$. It is well known that a number is even and perfect if and only if it has the form $2^{p-1} (2^p-1)$ where $2^p-1$ is prime.
No odd perfect numbers are known, nor has any proof of their nonexistence ever been given. In the meantime, much work has been done in establishing conditions necessary for their existence. One class of necessary conditions would be lower bounds for the distinct prime divisors of an odd perfect number.
For example, Cohen and Hagis have shown that the largest prime divisor of an odd perfect number must exceed $10^6$, and Hagis showed that the second largest must exceed $10^3$. In this paper, we improve the latter bound. In particular, we prove the statement in the title of this paper.
References
- Leonard M. Adleman, Carl Pomerance, and Robert S. Rumely, On distinguishing prime numbers from composite numbers, Ann. of Math. (2) 117 (1983), no. 1, 173–206. MR 683806, DOI 10.2307/2006975
- A. Bang, Taltheoretiske Undersøgelser, Tidsskrift Math. 5 IV (1886), 70–80, 130–137.
- M. Brandstein, New lower bound for a factor of an odd perfect number, #82T-10-240, Abstracts Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1982), 257.
- R. P. Brent, G. L. Cohen, and H. J. J. te Riele, Improved techniques for lower bounds for odd perfect numbers, Math. Comp. 57 (1991), no. 196, 857–868. MR 1094940, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1991-1094940-3
- E. Chein, An odd perfect number has at least 8 prime factors, Ph.D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University (1979).
- Graeme L. Cohen, On the largest component of an odd perfect number, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 42 (1987), no. 2, 280–286. MR 869751, DOI 10.1017/S1446788700028251
- J. Condict, On an odd perfect number’s largest prime divisor, Senior Thesis, Middlebury College (1978).
- I. Gradštein, O. Nečetnych soveršennych čislah, Mat. Sb. 32 (1925), 476–510.
- Peter Hagis Jr., Outline of a proof that every odd perfect number has at least eight prime factors, Math. Comp. 35 (1980), no. 151, 1027–1032. MR 572873, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0572873-9
- Peter Hagis Jr., On the second largest prime divisor of an odd perfect number, Analytic number theory (Philadelphia, Pa., 1980) Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 899, Springer, Berlin-New York, 1981, pp. 254–263. MR 654532
- Peter Hagis Jr. and Graeme L. Cohen, Every odd perfect number has a prime factor which exceeds $10^6$, Math. Comp. 67 (1998), no. 223, 1323–1330. MR 1484897, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00982-X
- Peter Hagis Jr. and Wayne L. McDaniel, On the largest prime divisor of an odd perfect number, Math. Comp. 27 (1973), 955–957. MR 325508, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1973-0325508-0
- Peter Hagis Jr. and Wayne L. McDaniel, On the largest prime divisor of an odd perfect number. II, Math. Comp. 29 (1975), 922–924. MR 371804, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1975-0371804-2
- D. Iannucci, On the third largest prime divisor of an odd perfect number, Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University (1995).
- Albert Eagle, Series for all the roots of the equation $(z-a)^m=k(z-b)^n$, Amer. Math. Monthly 46 (1939), 425–428. MR 6, DOI 10.2307/2303037
- Morgan Ward and R. P. Dilworth, The lattice theory of ova, Ann. of Math. (2) 40 (1939), 600–608. MR 11, DOI 10.2307/1968944
- C. J. Everett Jr., Annihilator ideals and representation iteration for abstract rings, Duke Math. J. 5 (1939), 623–627. MR 13
- Carl Pomerance, Odd perfect numbers are divisible by at least seven distinct primes, Acta Arith. 25 (1973/74), 265–300. MR 340169, DOI 10.4064/aa-25-3-265-300
- Carl Pomerance, The second largest prime factor of an odd perfect number, Math. Comput. 29 (1975), 914–921. MR 0371801, DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1975-0371801-7
- N. Robbins, The non-existence of odd perfect numbers with less than seven distinct prime factors, Ph.D. Thesis, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn (1972).
- J. Sylvester, Sur l’impossibilité de l’existence d’un nombre parfait impair qui ne contient pas au moins 5 diviseurs premiers distincts, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 106 (1888), 522–526.
- C. J. Everett Jr., Annihilator ideals and representation iteration for abstract rings, Duke Math. J. 5 (1939), 623–627. MR 13
Additional Information
- Douglas E. Iannucci
- Affiliation: University of the Virgin Islands, 2 John Brewers Bay, St. Thomas, VI 00802
- Email: diannuc@uvi.edu
- Received by editor(s): June 16, 1997
- Received by editor(s) in revised form: August 25, 1997
- Published electronically: May 17, 1999
- © Copyright 1999 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Math. Comp. 68 (1999), 1749-1760
- MSC (1991): Primary 11A25, 11Y70
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-99-01126-6
- MathSciNet review: 1651761