Skip to Main Content

Mathematics of Computation

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1960 (published as Mathematical Tables and other Aids to Computation 1943-1959), Mathematics of Computation is devoted to research articles of the highest quality in computational mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6842 (online) ISSN 0025-5718 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Mathematics of Computation is 1.78.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Nitsche’s method for Navier–Stokes equations with slip boundary conditions
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Ingeborg G. Gjerde and L. Ridgway Scott HTML | PDF
Math. Comp. 91 (2022), 597-622 Request permission

Abstract:

We formulate Nitsche’s method to implement slip boundary conditions for flow problems in domains with curved boundaries. The slip boundary condition, often referred to as the Navier friction condition, is critical for understanding and simulating a wide range of phenomena such as turbulence, droplet spread and flow through microdevices. In this work, we highlight the role of the approximation of the normal and tangent vector. In particular, we show that using the normal and tangent vectors with respect to the discretized domain $\Omega _h$, denoted $\mathbf {n}_h$ and $\boldsymbol {\tau }_h$, is suboptimal. Taking instead a projection of the normal and tangent vectors with respect to $\Omega$, denoted $\mathbf {n}_\pi$ and $\boldsymbol {\tau }_\pi$, gives the best convergence rate that can be expected for a polygonal approximation of a curved boundary.

Finally we also prove that, if you use instead the exact slip with $\mathbf {n}_h$ and $\boldsymbol {\tau }_h$, the approximation converges to the wrong solution. This is known as the Babuška-Sapondzhyan Paradox. Thus Nitsche’s method relaxes the slip condition and avoids the lack of convergence.

References
  • D. Boffi, Stability of higher order triangular Hood-Taylor methods for the stationary Stokes equations, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 4 (1994), no. 2, 223–235. MR 1269482, DOI 10.1142/S0218202594000133
  • Daniele Boffi, Three-dimensional finite element methods for the Stokes problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997), no. 2, 664–670. MR 1442933, DOI 10.1137/S0036142994270193
  • Susanne C. Brenner and L. Ridgway Scott, The mathematical theory of finite element methods, 3rd ed., Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 15, Springer, New York, 2008. MR 2373954, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0
  • Gregory A. Chechkin, Dag Lukkassen, and Annette Meidell, On the Sapondzhyan-Babuška paradox, Appl. Anal. 87 (2008), no. 12, 1443–1460. MR 2482391, DOI 10.1080/00036810802140632
  • Ibrahima Dione and José M. Urquiza, Penalty: finite element approximation of Stokes equations with slip boundary conditions, Numer. Math. 129 (2015), no. 3, 587–610. MR 3311462, DOI 10.1007/s00211-014-0646-9
  • T. Dupont, Johnny Guzmán, and L. R. Scott. Obtaining higher-order Galerkin accuracy when the boundary is polygonally approximated, arXiv:abs/2001.03082, 2021.
  • E. B. Dussan. On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11 (January 1979), no. 1, 371–400.
  • Patrick E. Farrell, Lawrence Mitchell, L. Ridgway Scott, and Florian Wechsung, A Reynolds-robust preconditioner for the Scott-Vogelius discretization of the stationary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, SMAI J. Comput. Math. 7 (2021), 75–96. MR 4274063, DOI 10.5802/smai-jcm.72
  • Jouni Freund and Rolf Stenberg. On weakly imposed boundary conditions for second order problems. In Proceedings of the Ninth Int. Conf. Finite Elements in Fluids, pp. 327–336. Venice, 1995.
  • Mohamed Gad-el Hak. The fluid mechanics of microdevices, J. Fluids Eng. 121 (1999), no. 1, 5–33.
  • Giovanni P. Galdi and William J. Layton, Approximation of the larger eddies in fluid motions. II. A model for space-filtered flow, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 10 (2000), no. 3, 343–350. MR 1753115, DOI 10.1142/S0218202500000203
  • Gung-Min Gie and James P. Kelliher, Boundary layer analysis of the Navier-Stokes equations with generalized Navier boundary conditions, J. Differential Equations 253 (2012), no. 6, 1862–1892. MR 2943945, DOI 10.1016/j.jde.2012.06.008
  • Vivette Girault and Pierre-Arnaud Raviart, Finite element methods for Navier-Stokes equations, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986. Theory and algorithms. MR 851383, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-61623-5
  • Ingeborg Gjerde and L. Ridgway Scott. Kinetic-energy instability of flows with slip boundary conditions. (submitted to J. Math. Fluid Mech.), 2021.
  • Ingeborg Gjerde and L. Ridgway Scott. Lower bounds for the error in Nitsche’s method for the Navier-Stokes equations with slip boundary conditions. Research Report UC/CS TR-2021-09, Dept. Comp. Sci., Univ. Chicago, 2021.
  • Ingeborg G. Gjerde and Ridgway Scott. nitsche-method-for-navier-stokes-with-slip (source code), 2021. Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/4591766.
  • Sydney Goldstein. Modern developments in fluid dynamics: an account of theory and experiment relating to boundary layers, turbulent motion and wakes, vol. 2, Clarendon Press, 1938.
  • James P. Kelliher, Navier-Stokes equations with Navier boundary conditions for a bounded domain in the plane, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 38 (2006), no. 1, 210–232. MR 2217315, DOI 10.1137/040612336
  • Eric Lauga, Michael Brenner, and Howard Stone. Microfluidics: the no-slip boundary condition. In Cameron Tropea, Alexander L. Yarin, and John F. Foss, editors, Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics, pp. 1219–1240. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
  • Yasunori Maekawa and Anna Mazzucato, The inviscid limit and boundary layers for Navier-Stokes flows, Handbook of mathematical analysis in mechanics of viscous fluids, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 781–828. MR 3916787, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13344-7_{1}
  • Vladimir Gilelevich Maz’ya and Sergei Aleksandrovich Nazarov. About the Sapondzhyn–Babuška paradox in the plate theory, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. Arm. Rep. 78 (1984), 127–130.
  • Michael Neilan, The Stokes complex: a review of exactly divergence-free finite element pairs for incompressible flows, 75 years of mathematics of computation, Contemp. Math., vol. 754, Amer. Math. Soc., [Providence], RI, [2020] ©2020, pp. 141–158. MR 4132120, DOI 10.1090/conm/754/15142
  • Chiara Neto, Drew R. Evans, Elmar Bonaccurso, Hans-Jürgen Butt, and Vincent S. J. Craig. Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies, Rep. Progr. Phys. 68 (2005), no. 12, 2859.
  • G. Rieder. On the plate paradox of Sapondzhyan and Babuška, Mech. Res. Commun. 1 (1974), no. 1, 51–53.
  • W.R. Schowalter. The behavior of complex fluids at solid boundaries, J. Non-Newton, Fluid Mech. 29 (1988), 25–36.
  • L. Ridgway Scott. Introduction to automated modeling with FEniCS. Computational Modeling Initiative, 2018.
  • L. Ridgway Scott. A local Fortin operator for lowest-order Taylor–Hood. Research Report UC/CS TR-2021-07, Dept. Comp. Sci., Univ. Chicago, 2021.
  • Ridgway Scott, Interpolated boundary conditions in the finite element method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 12 (1975), 404–427. MR 386304, DOI 10.1137/0712032
  • Elias M. Stein, Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 30, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970. MR 0290095
  • Rolf Stenberg, On some three-dimensional finite elements for incompressible media, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 63 (1987), no. 3, 261–269. MR 911612, DOI 10.1016/0045-7825(87)90072-7
  • Rolf Stenberg, On some techniques for approximating boundary conditions in the finite element method, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 63 (1995), no. 1-3, 139–148. International Symposium on Mathematical Modelling and Computational Methods Modelling 94 (Prague, 1994). MR 1365557, DOI 10.1016/0377-0427(95)00057-7
  • Vidar Thomée, Galerkin finite element methods for parabolic problems, 2nd ed., Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 25, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. MR 2249024
  • José M. Urquiza, André Garon, and Marie-Isabelle Farinas, Weak imposition of the slip boundary condition on curved boundaries for Stokes flow, J. Comput. Phys. 256 (2014), 748–767. MR 3117433, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.08.045
  • R. Verfürth, Finite element approximation of incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with slip boundary condition. II, Numer. Math. 59 (1991), no. 6, 615–636. MR 1124131, DOI 10.1007/BF01385799
  • Rüdiger Verfürth. Finite element approximation on incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with slip boundary condition, Numer. Math. 50 (1986), no. 6, 697–721.
  • M. Winter, B. Schott, A. Massing, and W. A. Wall, A Nitsche cut finite element method for the Oseen problem with general Navier boundary conditions, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 330 (2018), 220–252. MR 3759094, DOI 10.1016/j.cma.2017.10.023
  • Jun Zhang, Matthew K. Borg, and Jason M. Reese. Multiscale simulation of dynamic wetting, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 115 (2017), 886–896.
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Mathematics of Computation with MSC (2020): 65N30, 65N30
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2020): 65N30, 65N30
Additional Information
  • Ingeborg G. Gjerde
  • Affiliation: Simula Research Laboratory, Kristian Augusts gate 23, 0164 Oslo, Norway
  • MR Author ID: 1339212
  • Email: ingeborg@simula.no
  • L. Ridgway Scott
  • Affiliation: Departments of Computer Science and of Mathematics, University of Chicago, 122 Eckhart Hall, Chicago, Illinois
  • MR Author ID: 157720
  • ORCID: 0000-0002-7885-7106
  • Email: ridg@uchicago.edu
  • Received by editor(s): October 15, 2020
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: March 22, 2021, and July 13, 2021
  • Published electronically: November 5, 2021
  • © Copyright 2021 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Math. Comp. 91 (2022), 597-622
  • MSC (2020): Primary 65N30, 65N30
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3682
  • MathSciNet review: 4379970