Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Not every minimal Hausdorff space is $e$-compact
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by R. M. Stephenson PDF
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1975), 381-389 Request permission

Abstract:

A topological space $X$ is said to be $e$-compact with respect to a dense subset $D$ provided either of the following equivalent conditions is satisfied: (i) every open cover of $X$ has a finite subcollection which covers $D$; (ii) every ultrafilter on $D$ converges to a point of $X$. If there exists a dense subset with respect to which a space $X$ is $e$-compact, then $X$ is called $e$-compact.$^{1}$ Two problems recently raised by S. H. Hechler are the following. (a) Is every minimal Hausdorff space $e$-compact? (b) If there exists a Hausdorff space which is $e$-compact with respect to a space $D$, must $D$ be completely regular? The main purpose of this paper is to provide a negative answer to (a) and to present some results which the author hopes will be of use in the solution to (b). These results can also be used to obtain a construction of $\beta X$ for certain completely regular Hausdorff spaces $X$.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society with MSC: 54D25
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC: 54D25
Additional Information
  • © Copyright 1975 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1975), 381-389
  • MSC: Primary 54D25
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1975-0423296-4
  • MathSciNet review: 0423296