$Q$-sets do not necessarily have strong measure zero
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Jaime Ihoda and Saharon Shelah PDF
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 102 (1988), 681-683 Request permission
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to give a negative answer to the following question (see Miller [4]): Do all $Q$-sets have strong measure zero?References
- James E. Baumgartner, Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 87, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 1–59. MR 823775, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511758867.002
- W. G. Fleissner, Current research on $Q$ sets, Topology, Vol. I (Proc. Fourth Colloq., Budapest, 1978) Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, vol. 23, North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1980, pp. 413–431. MR 588793
- William G. Fleissner and Arnold W. Miller, On $Q$ sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1980), no. 2, 280–284. MR 550513, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-1980-0550513-4
- Arnold W. Miller, Special subsets of the real line, Handbook of set-theoretic topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 201–233. MR 776624
- A. R. D. Mathias, Happy families, Ann. Math. Logic 12 (1977), no. 1, 59–111. MR 491197, DOI 10.1016/0003-4843(77)90006-7
- Fritz Rothberger, On some problems of Hausdorff and of Sierpiński, Fund. Math. 35 (1948), 29–46. MR 29958, DOI 10.4064/fm-35-1-29-46
Additional Information
- © Copyright 1988 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 102 (1988), 681-683
- MSC: Primary 03E35; Secondary 03E15
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1988-0929002-8
- MathSciNet review: 929002